The Effectiveness of the Combination of Superficial Cervical Block With Clavipectoral Block Compared to the Combination With Interscalene Block in Clavicle Fracture Surgery
The Effectiveness of the Combination of Superficial Cervical Block With Clavipectoral Block Compared to the Combination With Interscalene Block in Clavicle Fracture Surgery
This study aims to compare two local anesthesia techniques (nerve blocks) for patients undergoing collarbone (clavicle) fracture surgery.
Typically, this surgery uses the "Interscalene Block" (ISB) technique. However, this method carries risks of side effects such as shortness of breath because the nerves controlling the respiratory muscles may also be numbed. As an alternative, researchers want to test a newer combination: the "Clavipectoral Block" (CPB) combined with the "Superficial Cervical Block" (SCB).
The researchers want to determine if the new combination (SCB-CPB) provides pain relief as effective as the traditional technique (SCB-ISB), but with improved safety, particularly in maintaining the patient's respiratory stability and heart rate. During the study, patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
SCB-CPB Group: Receives a combination of nerve blocks in the collarbone area.
SCB-ISB Group: Receives a combination of nerve blocks in the neck area (interscalene).
The results of this study are expected to provide a more comfortable and safer anesthesia option for patients undergoing clavicle surgery.
This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of a regional anesthesia technique that avoids the phrenic nerve involvement commonly seen in shoulder-related surgeries.
Study Rationale:
Clavicle fracture surgeries often require reliable anesthesia of the cervical plexus and branches of the brachial plexus. While the Interscalene Block (ISB) is a common choice, its association with phrenic nerve palsy and subsequent hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis poses risks for patients with respiratory compromise. The Clavipectoral Block (CPB) is a newer approach that targets the sensory nerves of the clavicle locally between the clavipectoral fascia and the periosteum, theoretically sparing the phrenic nerve.
Methods and Procedure:
Thirty-four (34) patients scheduled for elective clavicle surgery at RS Ngoerah will be enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups (n=17 per group):
SCB-CPB Group (Experimental): Participants receive a combination of Ultrasound-Guided (USG) Superficial Cervical Block and Clavipectoral Block using a total volume of 15-20 mL of local anesthetic (0.5% Bupivacaine or according to clinical protocol).
SCB-ISB Group (Control): Participants receive a combination of USG Superficial Cervical Block and Interscalene Block with the same volume and concentration of local anesthetic.
Clinical Assessment:
Block Performance: The time taken to perform the blocks (from probe placement to needle withdrawal) and the onset of sensory blockade will be recorded.
Intraoperative Management: Hemodynamic parameters (Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Pressure) will be monitored at T0 (baseline), T1 (post-block), T2 (incision), T3 (30 mins), T4 (60 mins), and T5 (post-op).
Success Rate: The incidence of "partial block" (requiring additional intraoperative rescue analgesia/sedation) will be compared between the two groups.
Post-operative Monitoring: The total duration of analgesia (time to first request for rescue analgesia) will be monitored for up to 24 hours post-operatively.
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk), followed by Independent T-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for numerical data, and Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact tests for categorical data. Repeated measures ANOVA will be used for hemodynamic stability analysis.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: