Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-A02711-46 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
"Pancreatic cancer, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, is one of the most serious and deadly cancers. Its outlook is very poor, with fewer than 10% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. This is largely because the disease is often discovered at a late stage and because it frequently comes back even after surgery.
When the tumor is located in the head of the pancreas, the only treatment that can potentially cure the disease is a major operation called a pancreaticoduodenectomy, also known as the Whipple procedure. This surgery is now safely performed in specialized hospitals, but it remains complex and carries a high risk of complications. Importantly, even after surgery, cancer cells often remain, leading to a high rate of local recurrence.
A newer surgical technique, known as the "artery-first" approach, changes the order of the operation. By carefully exposing a major blood vessel near the pancreas at the beginning of the surgery, surgeons can better assess whether the tumor can be completely removed and can improve the precision of the operation.
This research protocol aims to compare this artery-first technique with the standard surgical approach. The goal is to determine whether starting the operation by addressing the artery allows for more complete tumor removal and reduces the risk of cancer coming back in patients with pancreatic cancer of the head of the pancreas."
"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe by 2030. It remains the worst prognostic gastrointestinal cancer, with a 7-9% five-year overall survival (OS) rate. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, i.e., locally advanced (30%) or metastatic (50%), and more than 60% of the operated patients relapse within 3 years after surgery.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: standard approach Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only potentially curative technique for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The procedure, commonly named the Whipple procedure, was described in 1935 when O.Whipple reported the previously modified technique by A.Codinivillan and W.Keusch. In its current form, the Whipple procedure owes its evolution to many physicians and surgeons' groundbreaking and innovative work. The procedure is now performed with an acceptable mortality rate of < 4% in expert centers and and nevertheless 30% morbidity.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: SMA first approach, peri-adventitial dissection Whipple procedure with mesenteric first approach is a technique described and validated in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This technique, which involves dissecting the peri-adventitial tissues of the superior mesenteric artery, has been reported mainly in borderline or locally advanced tumors of the head of the pancreas, to control the artery and improve the quality of the resection. This technique allows exposure of the right hemicircumference of the artery and clearance of the origin of the celiac trunk before sectioning the key elements of the duodenopancreatectomy cephalic.
Six surgical approaches that can be considered as "artery first" have been reported by Sanjay et al. Two approaches to avoid technical biases in SMA dissection and arterial margins will be considered: the right posterior approach and the anterior approach.
Although PD is mature, the low R0 resection rate remains a major issue, and most patients will develop a local recurrence, as demonstrated by autopsy studies.
The investigators hypothesise that the SMA first approach (SMA-PD) improves R0 resection margins compared to the standard procedure (ST-PD) during PD in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma."
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard arm (ST-PD) | Active Comparator | Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. |
|
| Experimental arm (SMA-PD) | Experimental | SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. | Procedure | Before any irreversible gesture, the surgeon identifies and isolates the superior mesenteric artery and dissects nerve plexus and nodes on the right side up to the SMA origin (right posterior or anterior approach). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| R0 resection rate (clear margin > 1 mm) | Proportion of randomized patients with R0 margins. R0 defined as clear margin > 1 mm; R1 as ≤ 1 mm using standardized pathology protocol with central review. | day of surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-free survival (DFS) | Disease-free survival will be evaluated using CT scans performed during follow-up | Up to 48 months after randomization |
| Overall survival (OS) | Death from any cause or last follow-up, whichever occurs first. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma defined as "borderline" with arterial contact, locally advanced, non-resectable, or metastatic.
Surgical or anesthesiologic contra-indications:
Non-controlled congestive heart failure - non-treated angina - recent myocardial infarction (in the previous year) - non-controlled AHT (SBP >160 mm or DBP > 100 mm, despite optimal drug treatment), long QT
Major non-controlled infection
Major comorbidity that may preclude the surgery
Severe liver failure
Any medical, psychological, or social situation that (in the investigator's opinion) could limit (i) the patient's compliance with the protocol or (ii) the ability to obtain or interpret data
Pregnant or breastfeeding women and women of childbearing age not using effective means of contraception
Curatorship or guardianship or patient placed under judicial protection
Participation in other interventional research type 1, clinical investigation or clinical trial during the study
Secondary exclusion criterion (during surgery):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Pietrasz, Medical Doctor | Contact | +33 45 49 66 92 | daniel.pietrasz@aphp.fr | |
| Antonhio Sa Cunha, MD PHD | Contact | +33 1 45 59 39 13 | antonio.sacunha@aphp.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Amiens | Amiens | France |
|
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15273542 | Background | Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. | |
| 23728278 | Background | Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Carcinoma of the Pancreas | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. | Procedure | Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. |
|
|
| Up to 48 months after randomization |
| Operative Blood Loss | Intraoperative blood loss measured in milliliters and perioperative transfusion requirements. | During surgery |
| Operative Time | Duration of surgical procedure measured in minutes from incision to skin closure. | During surgery |
| Postoperative Complications | Postoperative complications assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). | Up to 3 months after surgery |
| Postoperative Morbidity | Morbidity will be assessed by comparing the percentage distribution of postoperative complications between the two groups | Up to 3 months after surgery |
| Health related quality of Life | Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Pancreatic Cancer Module 26 (QLQ-PAN26) | At inclusion and 6 months after surgery |
| CHU Angers | Angers | France |
|
| CHU Besançon | Besançon | France |
|
| Hôpital Haut Lévêque | Bordeaux | France |
|
| Hôpital Estaing | Clermont-Ferrand | France |
|
| Hôpital François Mitterrand | Dijon | France |
|
| CHU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez | Lille | France |
|
| Hôpital Claude Huriez | Lille | France |
|
| CHU Dupuytren 1 | Limoges | France |
|
| Centre Léon Bérard | Lyon | France |
|
| Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse | Lyon | France |
|
| Hôpital Saint Eloi | Montpellier | France |
|
| Hôpitaux de Brabois | Nancy | France |
|
| Chu Nantes | Nantes | France |
|
| Hôpital Ambroise Paré | Paris | France |
|
| Hôpital Beaujon | Paris | France |
|
| Hôpital Cochin | Paris | France |
|
| Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière | Paris | France |
|
| Hôpital Charles-Nicolle | Rouen | France |
|
| CHU Strasbourg | Strasbourg | France |
|
| Hôpital Rangueil | Toulouse | France |
|
| Hôpital Paul Brousse | Villejuif | France |
|
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | France |
|
| 33845462 | Background | Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, Chiorean EG, Chung V, Czito B, Del Chiaro M, Dillhoff M, Donahue TR, Dotan E, Ferrone CR, Fountzilas C, Hardacre J, Hawkins WG, Klute K, Ko AH, Kunstman JW, LoConte N, Lowy AM, Moravek C, Nakakura EK, Narang AK, Obando J, Polanco PM, Reddy S, Reyngold M, Scaife C, Shen J, Vollmer C, Wolff RA, Wolpin BM, Lynn B, George GV. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Apr 1;19(4):439-457. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017. |
| 31751791 | Background | Jiang X, Yu Z, Ma Z, Deng H, Ren W, Shi W, Jiao Z. Superior mesenteric artery first approach can improve the clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 18. |
| 32143434 | Background | Kim SY, Choi M, Hwang HK, Rho SY, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Intraoperative Transfusion is Independently Associated with a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Cancer-a Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 4;9(3):689. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030689. |
| 21369744 | Background | Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Delman KA, Staley CA 3rd, Kooby DA. Effects of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on disease recurrence and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1327-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1476-3. Epub 2011 Jan 8. |
| 25707813 | Background | Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Margonis GA, Gupta R, Amini N, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Impact of blood transfusions and transfusion practices on long-term outcome following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):887-96. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2776-5. Epub 2015 Feb 24. |
| 26293837 | Background | Mavros MN, Xu L, Maqsood H, Gani F, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Al-Refaie WB, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4382-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4823-6. Epub 2015 Aug 21. |
| 25724606 | Background | Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 6. |
| 33630454 | Background | Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Giuliani T, Di Gioia A, Andrianello S, Zingaretti CC, Brentegani G, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Pea A, Paiella S, Malleo G, Tuveri M, Landoni L, Esposito A, Casetti L, Butturini G, Falconi M, Salvia R. Pancreatoduodenectomy at the Verona Pancreas Institute: the Evolution of Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 3000 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1029-1038. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004753. Epub 2021 Jan 15. |
| 25794484 | Background | Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep;19(9):1581-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9. Epub 2015 Mar 21. |
| 23464850 | Background | Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, Le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N, Sauvanet A, Autret A, Turrini O, Monges-Ranchin G, Boher JM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jan;16(1):20-33. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12061. Epub 2013 Mar 7. |
| 31912902 | Background | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8. |
| 19723142 | Background | Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology. 2009 Sep;55(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03376.x. |
| 18351300 | Background | Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, Reiser C, Herpel E, Friess H, Schirmacher P, Buchler MW. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1651-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9839-8. Epub 2008 Mar 20. |
| 16804874 | Background | Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006 Oct;93(10):1232-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5397. |
| 18081813 | Background | Verbeke CS. Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer--are we there yet? Histopathology. 2008 Jun;52(7):787-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02935.x. Epub 2007 Dec 13. |
| 16627216 | Background | Hishinuma S, Ogata Y, Tomikawa M, Ozawa I, Hirabayashi K, Igarashi S. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.09.016. |
| 16627229 | Background | Pessaux P, Varma D, Arnaud JP. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: superior mesenteric artery first approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):607-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.001. No abstract available. |
| 17858621 | Background | Whipple AO. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Islet Carcinoma : A Five-Year Follow-Up. Ann Surg. 1945 Jun;121(6):847-52. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194506000-00008. No abstract available. |
| 28338509 | Background | Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, Cameron JL, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL, He J. Patterns, Timing, and Predictors of Recurrence Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):936-945. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002234. |
| 26299994 | Background | Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Bourget P, Cros J, Couvelard A, Sauvanet A, Vullierme MP, Tournigand C, Hammel P. State of the art and future directions of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Nov;155:80-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 20. |
| 24840647 | Background | Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. |
| 27551890 | Background | Ferlay J, Partensky C, Bray F. More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017. Acta Oncol. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(9-10):1158-1160. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1197419. Epub 2016 Aug 23. |
| 31180816 | Background | Khorana AA, McKernin SE, Berlin J, Hong TS, Maitra A, Moravek C, Mumber M, Schulick R, Zeh HJ, Katz MHG. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 10;37(23):2082-2088. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00946. Epub 2019 Jun 10. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016577 | Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
| D059039 | Standard of Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013505 | Digestive System Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019984 | Quality Indicators, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Not provided
Not provided