Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the acute effects of bench press (BP) and machine chest press (MCP) exercises on the mechanical properties of the pectoralis major muscle in resistance-trained bodybuilders. Sixteen male athletes are randomly assigned to BP or MCP groups. Both groups perform four sets of ten repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum with equalized volume load. Muscle mechanical properties, including oscillation frequency, stiffness, decrement, relaxation time, and creep, are measured using MyotonPRO before and immediately after exercise. The study hypothesizes that BP will induce greater stiffness due to higher stabilization demands, whereas MCP will produce greater increases in oscillation frequency due to more isolated loading.
Exercise selection is a key determinant of acute neuromuscular responses during resistance training. Bench press (BP) and machine chest press (MCP) are widely used exercises targeting the pectoralis major, but they differ biomechanically in stabilization demands and load distribution. While BP requires multi-joint stabilization and increased neuromuscular coordination, MCP provides a guided movement pattern that isolates the pectoralis major.
Despite similar muscle activation reported in previous electromyographic studies, the acute mechanical responses of muscle tissue to these exercises have not been directly compared. Muscle mechanical properties, including oscillation frequency, stiffness, decrement, relaxation time, and creep, provide objective insights into neuromuscular function and fatigue.
In this randomized controlled trial, sixteen male bodybuilders with at least five years of resistance training experience are assigned to BP or MCP groups. Both groups perform four sets of ten repetitions at 80% 1RM. MyotonPRO is used to assess mechanical properties of the pectoralis major before and immediately after exercise.
The primary aim is to determine whether biomechanical differences between BP and MCP produce distinct acute mechanical responses in muscle tissue.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bench Press Group | Experimental | Participants performed a single-session resistance training protocol consisting of four sets of ten repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum using barbell bench press with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. |
|
| Machine Chest Press Group | Experimental | Participants performed a single-session resistance training protocol consisting of four sets of ten repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum using a machine chest press with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bench Press Exercise | Behavioral | Participants performed a resistance training protocol consisting of four sets of ten repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum using barbell bench press, with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in pectoralis major muscle stiffness measured by MyotonPRO | Muscle stiffness (N/m) of the pectoralis major was measured using MyotonPRO before and immediately after the exercise protocol. | Baseline and immediately post-exercise (within 90 seconds) |
| Change in oscillation frequency (muscle tone) of the pectoralis major measured by MyotonPRO | Muscle stiffness (N/m) and oscillation frequency (Hz), representing muscle tone, were measured using MyotonPRO before and immediately after the exercise protocol. | Baseline and immediately post-exercise (within 90 seconds) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giresun University - Sports Science Faculty | Giresun | Centre | 28100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to the small sample size and to ensure participant confidentiality and data protection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 14, 2026 | Apr 13, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
Participants are randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: bench press or machine chest press. Each group performs a single-session resistance training protocol consisting of four sets of ten repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum. Muscle mechanical properties are assessed before and immediately after the intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
The outcome assessor and data analyst were blinded to group allocation. Participants and care providers were not blinded due to the nature of the exercise interventions.
| Machine Chest Press Exercise | Behavioral | Participants performed a resistance training protocol consisting of four sets of ten repetitions at 80% of one-repetition maximum using a machine chest press, with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. |
|