Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of the performance and safety of a single-dose hyaluronic acid (Promovia hydro balance) in the treatment of non-traumatic degenerative meniscus tears
The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of a single-dose intra-articular hyaluronic acid treatment (Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg/4 mL; Innate S.r.l, Novi Ligure (AL), Italy) in restoring joint function and reducing associated pain. The safety of the treatment will also be assessed.
Primary objective: To evaluate, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the performance of intra-articular treatment with Promovia Hydro Balance at a 6-month follow-up (T6) in restoring joint function and improving associated pain in patients with non-traumatic degenerative meniscal tears.
Secondary objectives: To evaluate the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness, and patient quality of life at 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6) following the injection. The safety of the treatment and the consumption of analgesics/NSAIDs will also be evaluated in the various phases of the study at the various follow-up times.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with non-traumatic degenerative meniscus lesions | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg, Hyaluronic acid sodium salt and trehalose | Device | Promovia Hydro Balance 100 mg |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evalution T6 with Koos (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score): efficacy | To evaluate, through the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) functional score, the performance of intra-articular treatment with Promovia Hydro Balance at 6 months follow-up (T6) in the recovery of joint function and improvement of associated pain in patients affected by non-traumatic degenerative meniscus lesions | Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 6 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance evaluation T3 with Koos Questionnaire | Evaluate the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement of general pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life 3 (T3) after infiltration treatment. T3 evaluation with Koos questionnaire | Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AE and SAE | Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0 | Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 3 months from T0 |
| AE and SAE | Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giulia Avio | Contact | +393925481157 | giulia.avio@innate.it | |
| Chiara Fossati, medical doctor | Contact | i | chiara.fossati@asst-pini-cto.it |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO | Recruiting | Milan | MI | Italy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Evaluation of performance T3 with Womac (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) |
Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life at 3 months. Evaluation with Womac scale (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) |
| Change from Baseline in the evaluation at 3 Months |
| Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T3 compared to baseline | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at T3 compared to baseline (T0). econdary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life | Change from Baseline in NRS at 3 month from T0 |
| Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life | Change from Baseline in NRS at 6 months from T0 |
| Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months | Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months compared to baseline (T0). Secondary endpoints will consist of evaluating the performance of Promovia Hydro Balance in terms of improvement in overall pain, joint stiffness and patient quality of life | Change from Baseline at time of 6 months. |
| Presence of adverse events and serious adverse events at 6 months from T0 |
| consumption of analgesic/fans | consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0 | consumption of analgesic/fans at 3 months from T0 |
| consumption of analgesic/fans | consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0 | consumption of analgesic/fans at 6 months from T0 |