Comparative Study Between Topical Crisaborole 2% and Topical Fluticasone Propionate 0.05% in Treatment of Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
Comparative Study Between Topical Crisaborole 2% and Topical Fluticasone Propionate 0.05% in Treatment of Patients With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
This randomized, double-blind trial compared topical crisaborole 2% with topical fluticasone propionate 0.05% in children aged 1-12 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Forty patients were assigned to receive either crisaborole or fluticasone twice daily on affected areas for 6 weeks, with responders (>75% improvement in SCORAD) continuing the same treatment twice weekly for 12 weeks as maintenance. The study evaluated improvement in disease severity using SCORAD and ISGA, pruritus scores, disease-free survival, and local tolerability. Both treatments were effective and well tolerated; fluticasone produced faster short-term improvement, while crisaborole showed a trend toward fewer relapses and similar overall safety in this pediatric population.
This single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled study enrolled 40 children with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, defined by Hanifin and Rajka criteria, ISGA 2-3, and objective SCORAD up to 40. Participants were randomized to topical crisaborole 2% or fluticasone propionate 0.05%, applied twice daily for 6 weeks, with eligible responders continuing twice-weekly maintenance for 12 weeks. Outcomes included percentage improvement in SCORAD at Week 6, changes in ISGA and pruritus, disease-free survival, and local adverse events such as burning or redness. Both regimens improved disease severity with acceptable safety; fluticasone had greater early SCORAD improvement, while crisaborole showed numerically higher disease-free survival and lower relapse rates during follow-up.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: