Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to develop a machine learning model that can predict delirium in trauma patients before it clinically appears. The study focuses on analyzing brainwave (EEG) patterns collected over several days in the trauma ICU. By comparing different recording conditions-such as having eyes open versus closed-researchers aim to identify the most effective way to monitor brain health and detect early signs of delirium in critically ill patients.
Background and Rationale:
Delirium is a critical manifestation of acute brain dysfunction, affecting 10-15% of all hospitalized patients and over 25% of those in intensive care units (ICU). In the trauma ICU, patients are particularly vulnerable due to an inflammatory cascade from repeated surgeries, blood-brain barrier disruption, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and mandatory opioid administration. Despite its clinical significance-including increased mortality and long-term cognitive impairment-early detection remains challenging. Current bedside tools like the CAM-ICU are limited by their periodic nature and dependence on clinician expertise, often missing the rapid neurophysiologic fluctuations that define delirium.
Study Objectives and Methodology:
While previous studies have used electroencephalography (EEG) as a "snapshot" to identify delirium, such cross-sectional approaches often reflect transient sedative depth rather than true neurocognitive vulnerability. This study proposes a longitudinal approach, focusing on the trajectory of change in cortical dynamics over time.
We acquired brief, serial resting-state EEG three times daily for at least three consecutive days from critically ill trauma patients. Using a feasible frontal montage, we quantified a comprehensive set of features, including spectral power (slowing), nonlinear complexity, and phase-based functional connectivity.
Research Hypothesis:
The framework utilizes machine learning (ML) to harness these longitudinal trajectories, aiming to predict delirium vulnerability before formal clinical diagnosis. Furthermore, we hypothesize that eyes-open recordings-by imposing a minimal arousal constraint-will better capture wakeful network integrity and provide superior predictive power compared to traditional eyes-closed recordings, which are often confounded by sedation and drowsiness in the trauma ICU environment.
Clinical Impact:
By identifying the optimal recording condition and establishing an ML-based prediction framework, this study seeks to define a standardized neurophysiologic monitoring strategy. This will ultimately facilitate early intervention and improve the long-term neurological prognosis of severe trauma survivors.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delirum group | Patients who developed delirium during their ICU stay (confirmed by CAM-ICU) | ||
| Non-Delirium Group | Patients who did not develop delirium during their ICU stay. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive Performance for Delirium (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, AUROC | The predictive accuracy of the machine learning model based on longitudinal EEG trajectories will be evaluated to identify patients at risk of delirium. Model performance will be assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. | 3 to 4 days (during the longitudinal EEG data collection period) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Model Performance: Eyes-Open vs. Eyes-Closed States | Comparison of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between EEG data recorded during eyes-open and eyes-closed resting states to determine which condition provides superior predictive power. | 3 to 4 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Trauma patients admitted to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit (TICU) who meet the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 2 Patients with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score ≤ -2 History of neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, dementia, cerebrovascular disease) History of major psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder) History of illicit drug use disorder or positive results on a urine drug screen for substances other than Benzodiazepines or Tricyclic antidepressants.
Clinical evidence of acute alcohol withdrawal (CIWA-Ar score > 10) History of liver failure or hepatic encephalopathy (Child-Pugh Class B or C) Renal impairment requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) Inability to perform the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) due to the following Inability to communicate in Korean Failure to obey commands (unable to follow test instructions) Severe visual or hearing impairment Refusal to undergo CAM-ICU assessment Requirement for isolation due to infectious diseases (e.g., COVID-19, active tuberculosis).
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of adult trauma patients (aged 18-65) admitted to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit (TICU) at a level 1 trauma center in Korea. The cohort includes critically ill patients with a record of severe injury (ISS≥ 9) who are able to undergo serial EEG monitoring and clinical delirium assessments. Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disorders, or those with severe traumatic brain injury (AIS ≥ 2), are excluded to ensure the specificity of the neurophysiologic data.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajou University Hospital | Suwon | Kyonggi-do | 16499 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31508499 | Background | Sun H, Kimchi E, Akeju O, Nagaraj SB, McClain LM, Zhou DW, Boyle E, Zheng WL, Ge W, Westover MB. Automated tracking of level of consciousness and delirium in critical illness using deep learning. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Sep 9;2:89. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0167-0. eCollection 2019. | |
| 30579407 | Background | Numan T, van den Boogaard M, Kamper AM, Rood PJT, Peelen LM, Slooter AJC; Dutch Delirium Detection Study Group. Delirium detection using relative delta power based on 1-minute single-channel EEG: a multicentre study. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Oct 2. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional policies regarding data privacy and the protection of sensitive patient information.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003693 | Delirium |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003221 | Confusion |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 34987367 | Background | Kim H, McKinney A, Brooks J, Mashour GA, Lee U, Vlisides PE. Delirium, Caffeine, and Perioperative Cortical Dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 20;15:744054. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.744054. eCollection 2021. |
| 27501176 | Background | Hshieh TT, Saczynski J, Gou RY, Marcantonio E, Jones RN, Schmitt E, Cooper Z, Ayres D, Wright J, Travison TG, Inouye SK; SAGES Study Group. Trajectory of Functional Recovery After Postoperative Delirium in Elective Surgery. Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):647-653. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001952. |
| 25248058 | Background | Bryczkowski SB, Lopreiato MC, Yonclas PP, Sacca JJ, Mosenthal AC. Risk factors for delirium in older trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Dec;77(6):944-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000427. |
| 16953422 | Background | Walder B, Haase U, Rundshagen I. [Sleep disturbances in critically ill patients]. Anaesthesist. 2007 Jan;56(1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1086-4. German. |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |