Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A comparative clinical study on 16 patients with Type IV bone, divided into two groups (n=8): implants placed using Densah burs only versus Densah burs combined with laser bio stimulation, to evaluate implant stability and healing.
This study was designed as a comparative clinical trial involving two groups of patients receiving dental implants. A total of 16 patients are included, divided equally into two groups (n=8 each).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implant placement using Densah burs only | Active Comparator | all patient's surgeries to receive dental implants were placed using only Densah burs, all patients were selected with type IV Bone. Device used was Densah kit system |
|
| Implant placement using Densah burs combined with Laser biostimulation | Experimental | Surgeries for Implant placement using Densah burs combined with Laser biostimulation Using Densah Kit system as a devices and Low level laser biostimulation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| implant placement using Densah burs | Procedure | Using only Densah burs |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| immediate primary implant stability | Immediate primary implant stability was assessed through the measurement of insertion torque. The unit of measurement is (N.cm) | immediately |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability and ossification | After 6 months following up it was measured clinically using osstell | 6 months follow up |
| Modified Plaque Index | Recorded at 4 surfaces per implant (Mesial, distal, buccal & lingual) and expressed as Mean value With scoring (0-3) 0= No Plaque, 1= plaque detected by probe, 2= visible plaque, 3= abundant plaque. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Etimad Ah shoreibah, professor | prof. of oral medicine, periodontology, Diagnosis and radiology | Study Chair |
| lobna mo abdelaziz, lecturer | lacturer of oral medicine, perio, diagnosis and radiology | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of dental medicine for Girls AlAzhar university | Cairo | 12345 | Egypt |
results telling which group has better healing and stability
6 months
using email for contacting
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D028022 | Low-Level Light Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053685 | Laser Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D010789 | Phototherapy |
Not provided
Not provided
This study was designed as a comparative clinical trial involving two groups of patients receiving dental implants. A total of 16 patients are included, divided equally into two groups (n=8 each).
Not provided
Not provided
outcome assessor and statistical analysis helper
| implantation using Densah burs with Laser biostimulation | Procedure | laser was used combined with Densah burs during implantation |
|
| after 12 months following up. |
| Probing depth | PD measured at 6 sites per implant using a calibrated periodontal probe and expressed in mm (mean value). | after 12 months following up. |
| Modified gingival index | MGI assessed at four sites per implant and averaged. Scoring (0-3); 0= normal, 1= mild inflammation, 2= moderate inflammation, 3= severe bleeding tendency. | after 12 months following up. |