Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective, open-label clinical trial aims to compare a novel "Venous Tourniquet with Regional Low-Dose Sugammadex" method against the gold standard "Arterial Tourniquet" (Isolated Forearm Technique - IFT) for monitoring motor seizure activity during Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). Using a within-subject (intra-individual) design, each of the 40 enrolled patients will receive an arterial tourniquet on one arm and a venous tourniquet on the other arm simultaneously. The study will evaluate clinical efficacy in observing motor seizures, comparing the duration and visibility between the two limbs of the same patient, as well as assessing overall patient comfort and hemodynamics.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) requires general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade to prevent musculoskeletal injuries during induced seizures. However, systemic paralysis masks the motor seizure activity, which is the primary indicator of an adequate seizure. The gold standard for seizure monitoring is the Isolated Forearm Technique (IFT), which involves applying a high-pressure arterial tourniquet (>250 mmHg) before muscle relaxant administration. While effective, IFT can cause ischemic pain, sympathetic activation (hypertension, tachycardia), and requires specialized equipment.
This study investigates an alternative approach using a within-subject design. After systemic neuromuscular blockade (rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg) is established, an arterial tourniquet is applied to one arm (control limb), while a standard venous tourniquet (70 mmHg) is applied to the contralateral arm (experimental limb) followed by a regional IV injection of low-dose (0.3 mg/kg) sugammadex. This localized reversal aims to restore muscle function solely in the isolated limb. By evaluating both methods simultaneously on the same patient, the study eliminates inter-individual biological variability, allowing for a highly reliable comparison of motor seizure visibility, duration, and local complication rates between the arterial and venous tourniquet methods.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All ECT Patients | Experimental | All enrolled patients will receive both interventions simultaneously. An arterial tourniquet will be applied to one limb (control), and a venous tourniquet followed by regional sugammadex will be applied to the contralateral limb (experimental) during the same ECT session. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device: Arterial Tourniquet | Device | Within the same patient, the arm without intravenous access is fitted with an arterial tourniquet (>250 mmHg or 100 mmHg above systolic BP) before the systemic administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Seizure Duration | The duration of visible tonic-clonic motor seizure activity observed in both the arterial tourniquet limb and the venous tourniquet limb. It will be recorded in seconds. | From the initiation of the ECT electrical stimulus until the complete cessation of visible motor seizure activity in the limbs, assessed up to a maximum of 5 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS) | Assessment of tourniquet-induced pain in both procedural arms. Pain will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "the worst pain imaginable". A higher score indicates a worse outcome (more severe pain). | At exactly 30 minutes after the completion of the ECT procedure in the recovery room. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istanbul Medipol University | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077122 | Sugammadex |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D047408 | gamma-Cyclodextrins |
| D003505 | Cyclodextrins |
| D047028 | Macrocyclic Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device: Venous Tourniquet | Device | Within the same patient, the arm with intravenous access receives a venous tourniquet (elastic or 70 mmHg) after systemic rocuronium administration, followed by a regional IV injection of 0.3 mg/kg sugammadex (diluted in 20 ml saline) into that specific limb. |
|
| Sugammadex | Drug | Regional IV injection of 0.3 mg/kg sugammadex into the experimental limb. |
|
| Hemodynamic Changes: Heart Rate | Measurement of Heart Rate (beats per minute) to assess the systemic sympathetic response to tourniquet inflation and potential ischemic pain. | Evaluated at 3 specific time points: Baseline (1 minute prior to anesthesia induction), exactly 2 minutes after tourniquet inflation, and 1 minute after the cessation of the ECT motor seizure. |
| Hemodynamic Changes: Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) | Measurement of Mean Arterial Pressure (mmHg) to assess the systemic sympathetic response to tourniquet inflation and potential ischemic pain. | Evaluated at 3 specific time points: Baseline (1 minute prior to anesthesia induction), exactly 2 minutes after tourniquet inflation, and 1 minute after the cessation of the ECT motor seizure. |
| Incidence of Local Tourniquet Complications | The number of participants experiencing any visible local skin complications (such as petechiae, ecchymosis) or reporting signs of nerve compression/neuropraxia (numbness, tingling) at either of the tourniquet application sites. | At 1 hour after the completion of the ECT procedure, before discharge from the recovery area. |
| D019967 |
| Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D003912 |
| Dextrins |
| D013213 | Starch |
| D005936 | Glucans |
| D011134 | Polysaccharides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |