Analysis of Optimal Treatment Sequencing of Surufatinib and Somatostatin Analogs in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Analysis of Optimal Treatment Sequencing of Surufatinib and Somatostatin Analogs in Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study
This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study designed to compare the efficacy differences between two treatment sequence-"first-line surufatinib and second-line somatostatin analogs (SSA)" versus "first-line SSA and second-line surufatinib"-in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) from the initiation of first-line therapy to progression on second-line treatment. Secondary endpoints include PFS for each individual line of therapy, safety profiles, and exploration of influencing factors. This study aims to identify the optimal treatment sequence and to provide real-world evidence for optimizing individualized treatment strategies for patients with advanced NETs, thereby informing clinical decision-making in routine practice.
Inclusion Criteria:
Cohort A (Surufatinib → SSA): First-line surufatinib monotherapy followed by second-line long-acting somatostatin analog (SSA; lanreotide or octreotide long-acting release formulation) after disease progression.
Cohort B (SSA → Surufatinib): First-line long-acting SSA monotherapy followed by second-line surufatinib after disease progression.
Best supportive care (e.g., antidiarrheals, analgesics, hepatoprotective agents, symptomatic treatment for hormone secretion).
Local palliative interventions for focal lesions (e.g., transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, ablation for liver metastases) or cytoreductive surgery, provided they do not interrupt systemic study treatment or violate protocol.
For functional NETs, short-acting somatostatin analogs as rescue therapy for symptom control (frequency and dose to be recorded).
Exclusion Criteria: