Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Outcome of Primary vs Delayed Primary Closure of Laparotomy in Dirty Abdominal Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate and compare two different wound management strategies-primary closure (PC) and delayed primary closure (DPC)-in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis
The study includes 78 patients aged 15 to 80 years with free intraperitoneal contamination
Inclusion Criteria
To be included in the study, patients had to meet all of the following requirements:
Free intraperitoneal contamination resulting from the perforation of any hollow viscus, abdominal trauma, or firearm injuries
. Both genders were eligible for participation
. Participants had to fall within the age group of 15 to 80 years
. Exclusion Criteria
Patients meeting any of the following conditions were excluded from the trial to ensure the integrity of the results and control for confounding variables:
Age: Anyone younger than 15 years of age
. Pregnancy: All pregnant women were excluded
. Type of Surgery: Patients undergoing elective (scheduled) laparotomy rather than emergency procedures
. Medication: Any patient currently using steroids for any medical issue
.
Specific Medical Conditions:
Peritonitis caused specifically by pancreatitis . Diabetes mellitus, which was excluded to regulate factors that interfere with wound healing . Individuals with compromised immune systems
. These criteria were established to limit the progression of infection and specifically evaluate the impact of the wound closure technique-primary closure versus delayed primary closure-without the interference of significant comorbidities or external factors like malnutrition and immune suppression
.