Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This observational study aims to identify baseline factors that predict clinical response at six months in patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with radial pressure wave therapy (rESWT). The study is a secondary analysis of data obtained from a randomized double-blind clinical trial conducted in 2024 at a tertiary care hospital in Mexico.
Knee osteoarthritis is a common condition that causes pain, stiffness, and reduced physical function. Radial pressure wave therapy is a non-invasive treatment that has shown benefits in improving symptoms; however, not all patients respond equally.
This study will analyze patient characteristics at baseline, such as age, body mass index, pain severity, and functional status, to determine which factors are associated with meaningful improvement in pain and function after treatment. The results may help clinicians better identify which patients are more likely to benefit from this therapy and improve personalized treatment decisions.
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide. It is characterized by progressive joint degeneration, resulting in pain, stiffness, and functional limitations. Radial pressure wave therapy (rESWT) is a non-invasive treatment that has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee OA. However, there is significant variability in patient response, and the factors that predict treatment success are not well established.
Objective: The aim of this study is to identify baseline predictors of clinical response at six months in patients with knee OA treated with rESWT.
Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized double-blind clinical trial conducted in 2024 at the Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde". The original trial evaluated the effectiveness of three standardized rESWT protocols in patients with knee OA. The present study is designed as an observational cohort analysis including patients with complete baseline and follow-up data.
Baseline variables include demographic characteristics (age, sex), clinical factors (body mass index, baseline pain intensity, functional status), and radiographic severity. The primary outcome is the achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the WOMAC score at six months. Secondary outcomes include MCID in pain intensity measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and changes in WOMAC and NPRS scores over time.
Statistical analyses will be conducted to identify independent predictors of clinical response and to explore the interaction between baseline characteristics and treatment protocols.
Significance: Identifying predictors of response to rESWT may improve patient selection, optimize treatment strategies, and contribute to more personalized and cost-effective care in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with radial pressure wave therapy | Adult patients with clinically and radiographically diagnosed knee osteoarthritis who participated in a randomized double-blind clinical trial evaluating radial pressure wave therapy (rESWT) in 2024. This cohort includes participants with complete baseline and follow-up data up to six months and is used to identify baseline predictors of clinical response. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radial Pressure Wave Therapy | Procedure | Radial pressure wave therapy (rESWT) administered according to standardized protocols in the original randomized clinical trial. The therapy involves the application of acoustic waves to the knee joint to reduce pain and improve function. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain intensity measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | The proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain intensity measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a validated 0 to 10 scale where higher scores indicate greater pain. | 6 months after baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain intensity measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | The proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain intensity measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a validated 0 to 10 scale where higher scores indicate greater pain. | 6 months after baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients with clinically and radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis who participated in a randomized double-blind clinical trial evaluating radial pressure wave therapy (rESWT) at a tertiary care hospital in Mexico in 2024. Only participants with complete baseline and six-month follow-up data are included in this secondary analysis.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Armando Tonatiuh Avila Garcia, MD | Hospital Civil de Guadalajara | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde | Guadalajara | Jalisco | 44280 | Mexico |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34038642 | Result | Melese H, Alamer A, Getie K, Nigussie F, Ayhualem S. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and foot functions in subjects with chronic plantar fasciitis: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5007-5014. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1928775. Epub 2021 May 26. | |
| 37662911 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Change in WOMAC score over time | Change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score from baseline across follow-up assessments, reflecting changes in pain, stiffness, and physical function. | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months |
| Change in pain intensity measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) over time | Change in pain intensity from baseline measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at different follow-up time points. | Baseline, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months |
| Charles R, Fang L, Zhu R, Wang J. The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1193835. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1193835. eCollection 2023. |
| 31435724 | Result | Li H, Xiong Y, Zhou W, Liu Y, Liu J, Xue H, Hu L, Panayi AC, Mi B, Liu G. Shock-wave therapy improved outcome with plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Dec;139(12):1763-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03262-z. Epub 2019 Aug 21. |
| 23826009 | Result | Vahdatpour B, Sajadieh S, Bateni V, Karami M, Sajjadieh H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with ultrasonographic and subjective outcome assessments. J Res Med Sci. 2012 Sep;17(9):834-8. |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |