Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Hospitals, Leicester | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Mental health disorders are common in older people and are often unrecognised. Those living with mental health disorders who are being considered for vascular surgery have worse post operative outcomes, including longer length of hospital stay, higher readmission rates and emergency admissions to hospital. These patients also have more medical conditions contributing to their post surgery complications and poor health outcomes.
Surgery for vascular patients can include life changing operations, such as amputation, which impacts mental health and quality of life.
Shared decision making is the process whereby patients and clinicians work together to make evidence based decisions centred on patient values and preferences and is part of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and optimisation (CGA) model of care. SDM has been shown to improve patient experience through provision of realistic choice, enhanced interaction with clinicians, greater empowerment and increased confidence and trust in healthcare provision. Implementing SDM in vascular patients can be particularly challenging. Evaluating and communicating benefits and risks of available treatments for CLTI in a complex older patient population requires additional consideration beyond the inherent surgical risks. To achieve truly informed SDM, the clinician requires knowledge of the impact of co-existing conditions on postoperative recovery, the natural history of the surgical pathology with and without surgery and an awareness of the benefits and risks of alternative treatments underpinned by skilful communication.
Despite several studies associating mental health with both advancing age and poorer postoperative outcome, few studies have qualitatively explored the lived experience of older people with CLTI. Exploring the patient perspective will allow us to better understand the relationship between CLTI and mental health, and how patients can be better supported through SDM with the potential to reduce decisional regret. This will allow the development of strategies to enhance SDM taking mental health into account.
Study type This is a two-centre qualitative study, using a purposive sample from two NHS tertiary referral centres for vascular surgery (Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Leicester). For this study, semi-structured interviews and a co-production workshop will be undertaken.
Public and patient involvement and engagement This study has been prompted by PPIE work informing the larger POPS-SUp study where patient and carer participants highlighted the need to explore mental health issues in a diverse surgical population with a focus on the impact this may have on SDM and recovery from surgery. The PPIE group told us that people with mental health issues can be especially stigmatised in some minority communities and approaching this topic in a sensitive manner will be key to this study. Following consultation, the investigators recognize the need to collaborate with organisations such as the Centre for Ethnic Health Research and consult a diverse PPI group (established from previous studies) to co-develop recruitment strategies and ensure interview questions are culturally sensitive and appropriate. The investigators have included a budget to translate study documents in two languages (Gujarati and Punjabi) and for a face-to-face interpreter for up to ten interviews to reduce language barriers to participation.
This study will draw on the diverse knowledge and expertise of existing PPIE groups in mental health and vascular surgery and from the existing POPS-SUp study. The investigators have costed for a PPIE representative to work with us specifically on this study who has experience of CLTI and mental health issues. JS will review study documents and be involved in the dissemination and coproduction workshop. The investigators will hold three PPIE meetings with five to six patient representatives, one to provide feedback on the protocol and other study documents, one during the study to discuss findings and dissemination plan (community talks, social media, lay summaries, infographics) and one toward the end of the study for feedback and guidance on next steps.
An appropriate budget has been included in this bid to support all stakeholder and public involvement and engagement activities, including dissemination.
Data collection Purposive sampling of patients/carers will ensure representation from different ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and surgical management (type of surgery or conservative management). Patients/carers will be identified and approached in the first instance by the clinical care team.
A purposive sample of 10-15 healthcare professionals (vascular surgeons, therapists, clinical nurse specialists, geriatricians, anaesthetists, pharmacists) providing care for older people (aged ≥65 years) on an inpatient vascular surgical ward will be invited to participate by the clinical or research team.
Risks, burdens and benefits The team acknowledge that such a discussion can be upsetting but have developed expertise to signpost patients, carers or family members to appropriate support if distress results from involvement in this study. Whilst acknowledging this potential distress the research team and PPIE partners are clear that the research aims could not be addressed without this component of the study. Some patient partners have also told us that they found the discussion of their decisional regret therapeutic in moving forward.
Staff interviewees may be hesitant to raise criticism or suggest failings of the clinical service. To address this, the participant information sheets will highlight that researchers are independent of those delivering care and that there are no right or wrong answers. The PIS highlights that information will be fully anonymised (including names and places) and will emphasise that the researchers want to learn about things that do not work well so that they can be improved in future.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 patients/carers with CLTI >=65 with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression | 15 staff members caring for patients with CLTI >=65 with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety and/or depression during the SDM process via semi structured interview | Semi structured interviews will be qualitatively analysed via thematic analysis. | 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients
Carers
o In a non-paid caring role for a patient aged ≥65 years with CLTI and active symptoms of anxiety or depression
Staff o Healthcare professional (vascular surgeons, therapists, clinical nurse specialists, geriatricians, anaesthetists, pharmacists) providing care for people aged ≥65 years with CLTI
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
Carers
o Clinical and research team identify as lacking capacity to participate
Staff o Not providing care for older people with CLTI
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression living with critical limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) being considered for surgical intervention
Carers and staff looking after these patients
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridget C Strasser, MBBS (Hons) MPHTM BSc | Contact | +44 20 7188 7188 | b.strasser@nhs.net |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | London | SE19RT | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26369893 | Background | Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14. | |
| 17872937 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14. |
| 24979285 | Background | O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388. |
| 23303884 | Background | Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586. |
| 37786626 | Background | Paveley AM, Hall H, Mudford L, Partridge J, Dhesi J. Including the voice of older people in the co-design of perioperative pathways of care. Future Healthc J. 2023 Jul;10(2):143-146. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2023-0010. |
| 34220572 | Background | Xu RH, Zhou LM, Wang D. The Relationship Between Decisional Regret and Well-Being in Patients With and Without Depressive Disorders: Mediating Role of Shared Decision-Making. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 16;12:657224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.657224. eCollection 2021. |
| 31188201 | Background | Parmar KL, Law J, Carter B, Hewitt J, Boyle JM, Casey P, Maitra I, Farrell IS, Pearce L, Moug SJ; ELF Study Group. Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study. Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402. |
| 28817962 | Background | Wukich DK, Raspovic KM, Suder NC. Patients With Diabetic Foot Disease Fear Major Lower-Extremity Amputation More Than Death. Foot Ankle Spec. 2018 Feb;11(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/1938640017694722. Epub 2017 Feb 1. |
| 17280672 | Background | Wann-Hansson C, Rahm Hallberg I, Klevsgard R, Andersson E. The long-term experience of living with peripheral arterial disease and the recovery following revascularisation: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):552-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.11.006. Epub 2007 Feb 5. |
| 24024542 | Background | Ostler C, Ellis-Hill C, Donovan-Hall M. Expectations of rehabilitation following lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1169-75. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.833311. Epub 2013 Sep 11. |
| 34983652 | Background | Essien SK, Kopriva D, Linassi AG, Zucker-Levin A. Trends of limb amputation considering type, level, sex and age in Saskatchewan, Canada 2006-2019: an in-depth assessment. Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;80(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00759-1. |
| 34913364 | Background | Butala NM, Raja A, Xu J, Strom JB, Schermerhorn M, Beckman JA, Shishehbor MH, Shen C, Yeh RW, Secemsky EA. Association of Frailty With Treatment Selection and Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e023138. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023138. Epub 2021 Dec 16. |
| 33951523 | Background | Houghton JS, Nickinson AT, Helm JR, Dimitrova J, Dubkova S, Rayt HS, Gray LJ, Haunton VJ, Davies RS, Sayers RD. Associations of Clinical Frailty with Severity of Limb Threat and Outcomes in Chronic Limb-threatening Ischaemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:406-416. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 May 2. |
| 26461854 | Background | King AP, Abelson JL, Gholami B, Upchurch GR Jr, Henke P, Graham L, Liberzon I. Presurgical Psychological and Neuroendocrine Predictors of Psychiatric Morbidity After Major Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Psychosom Med. 2015 Nov-Dec;77(9):993-1005. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000235. |
| 15827913 | Background | Darnall BD, Ephraim P, Wegener ST, Dillingham T, Pezzin L, Rossbach P, MacKenzie EJ. Depressive symptoms and mental health service utilization among persons with limb loss: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):650-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.028. |
| 33971697 | Background | Jo SH, Kang SH, Seo WS, Koo BH, Kim HG, Yun SH. Psychiatric understanding and treatment of patients with amputations. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021 Jul;38(3):194-201. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2021.00990. Epub 2021 May 11. |
| 33455615 | Background | Kuruppu S, Ghani M, Pritchard M, Harris M, Weerakkody R, Stewart R, Perera G. A prospective investigation of depression and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing vascular surgical interventions: A retrospective cohort study using a large mental health database in South London. Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 18;64(1):e13. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2. |
| 34051514 | Background | Ghani M, Kuruppu S, Pritchard M, Harris M, Weerakkody R, Stewart R, Perera G. Vascular surgery receipt and outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses: Retrospective cohort study using a large mental healthcare database in South London. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110511. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110511. Epub 2021 May 20. |