Efficacy of Oral Urea Supplementation in Patients With SIAD Not Adequately Controlled With Fluid Restriction
Efficacy of Oral Urea Supplementation in Patients With SIAD Not Adequately Controlled With Fluid Restriction
Hyponatremia due to SIAD is frequently insufficiently corrected by fluid restriction alone, which remains the first-line therapy but is often poorly tolerated. Urea supplementation is recommended as second-line therapy.
This prospective study evaluates the effectiveness of oral urea supplementation in patients with chronic SIAD and persistent hyponatremia despite fluid restriction.
Hyponatremia (serum sodium, s-Na <135 mmol/L) is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients, with prevalence increasing with length of hospital stay. Among hypotonic euvolemic hyponatremias, the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the most frequent cause and is characterized by impaired free water excretion. SIAD may result from central nervous system disorders, pulmonary diseases, malignancies, or medications, and remains a diagnosis of exclusion.
When possible, treating the underlying cause can resolve the syndrome; however, in many cases the cause remains unknown and therapeutic options are limited. First-line treatment is fluid restriction, which is often insufficient and difficult to maintain in the long term. AVP receptor antagonists, such as tolvaptan, are effective but expensive and may carry a risk of overly rapid correction of serum sodium.
Second-line therapy recommended by current guidelines is urea supplementation, which has shown safety and efficacy in normalizing serum sodium. However, most available evidence derives from retrospective studies, and prospective data are limited.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of urea supplementation in patients with chronic, mildly symptomatic SIAD-related hyponatremia not adequately controlled by fluid restriction (≤1500 mL/day), and to explore its effects on neuroendocrine adaptation, body fluid composition, and bone metabolism.
Inclusion Criteria:
Fulfillment of all diagnostic criteria at baseline (day 0) was not mandatory, as the diagnosis of SIAD had already been established prior to study inclusion based on overall clinical assessment.
- Written informed consent obtained
Exclusion Criteria: