Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1U01CE003755-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Florida | OTHER |
| Georgia State University | OTHER |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to evaluate the active bystander training provided by Safe Bars, Inc. and their local chapter organizations to staff at alcohol-serving establishments (e.g., bars). The training aims to improve norms about violence, create safer environments by teaching staff to intervene in potentially harmful situations, and help prevent sexual violence in the venue community. The study will examine the implementation and effectiveness of the training. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare staff and patron experiences at venues that have received the training with venues that are offered a delayed training. Staff and patron participants will be asked to complete surveys over about 12 months, research staff will conduct observations of training and observations in the venues, and selected venue managers and staff will be asked to complete individual interviews.
The prevalence of sexual violence (SV) is still unacceptably high in the United States and alcohol-serving venues (e.g., bars, nightclubs) are the most common public setting where SV occurs. Extensive research confirms that the venue environment, coupled with alcohol consumption, is associated with increased rates of SV. Trainings for venue staff, which combine bystander intervention skill-building with discussion of organization-level changes to policies, norms, and environmental characteristics, are a promising approach to prevent SV because they address both individual and community (i.e., venue)-level risk and protective factors. To date, these trainings have not been rigorously evaluated in terms of SV outcomes. There is a critical need to test the effectiveness of prevention approaches that change both individual behavior in venues and characteristics of venue settings to reduce SV among staff and patrons.
The proposed study will assess the effectiveness of Safe Bars active bystander training, which involves training and support for alcohol-serving venues, for primary prevention of SV. Safe Bars, Inc. has implemented trainings for venue staff since 2013, with 135 venues in 15 states trained either directly by Safe Bars, Inc. or by one of their trained chapter organizations since 2022. Grounded in established theories of behavior change, Safe Bars promotes anti-violence norms and creates safer environments by increasing bystander intervention among venue staff and generating venue-level solutions to preventing SV (such as improving policies or increasing anti-violence messaging in the venue).
In a prior study, the research team established the feasibility of evaluating venue-based SV prevention by conducting an evaluability assessment, including formative research and pilot testing of procedures. Informed by the results, the proposed evaluation uses a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation design to assess the impact of Safe Bars training on SV among venue staff and patrons (Aim 1); examine venue environment characteristics, staff and patron psychosocial factors, and staff bystander intervention behaviors as mediators of Safe Bars training effects on SV outcomes (Aim 2); and examine potential moderating characteristics necessary for effective Safe Bars implementation and improved staff and patron outcomes (Aim 3). The study will use repeated surveys of patrons and staff at 15 intervention and 15 waitlist control venues, semi-structured interviews with managers and staff, training observations, venue observations, and Safe Bars implementation records to evaluate effectiveness and implementation and measure costs.
Safe Bars training is manualized for dissemination and has shown strong community acceptability. The outcomes of this study are expected to have an important positive impact by expanding the evidence base for community-level SV prevention and informing future implementation of venue-focused interventions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safe Bars Training | Experimental | Venues assigned to this arm will receive the Safe Bars active bystander training for their staff after baseline data collection for the study. |
|
| Wait-List Control | Other | Venues assigned to this arm will be offered the Safe Bars active bystander training for their staff after the 6-month follow-up data collection for the study. They will not receive an intervention during the first 6 months of the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safe Bars active bystander training | Behavioral | Safe Bars, Inc. (SBI)'s active bystander training is a primary prevention approach with three main components designed to (1) educate venue staff about the associations between alcohol and SV, (2) build bystander intervention skills and self-efficacy among venue staff, and (3) generate venue-level solutions to SV prevention. The 2.5-hour initial training combines didactic teaching with group brainstorming and practice-based role plays to teach staff actions they can take in response to risky scenarios observed in venue settings. Beyond increasing staff knowledge and skill, the training is also designed to spur venues' plans to support long-term culture change that reflects their local context and needs. After the initial training, SBI maintains a regular schedule of follow-up with trained venues to offer implementation support and access to SBI's other trainings in de-escalation and allyship. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual assault victimization among patrons | Endorsement (yes) to any of 5 items asking about experiences in the past month at the venue | Baseline to 12 months |
| Sexual harassment victimization among patrons | Endorsement (yes) of any of 8 items asking about experiences in the past month at the venue | Baseline to 12 months |
| Sexual assault victimization among staff | Endorsement (yes) to any of 5 items asking about experiences in the past month at the venue | Baseline to 12 months |
| Sexual harassment victimization among staff | Endorsement (yes) of any of 8 items asking about experiences in the past month at the venue | Baseline to 12 months |
| Staff bystander behavior | Proportion of opportunities (out of 17 possible) in which staff reported that they intervened in a risky situation | Baseline to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Staff acceptance of sexual violence | Average of 6 items on a 1-5 scale; higher scores indicate more acceptance | Baseline to 6 months |
| Staff self-efficacy to intervene | Average of 17 items on a 1-5 scale; higher scores indicate more self-efficacy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marni Kan | Contact | 919-485-2756 | mkan@rti.org | |
| Nichole Scaglione | Contact | (352) 294-0548 | nscaglione@ufl.edu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida | 32611 | United States |
Deidentified survey data from venue staff and patrons will be automatically archived after the study ends via the University of Florida's long-term electronic storage system, so it will be able to be made available to other researchers upon request with proper documentation of planned use and subsequent destruction. The data will be destroyed five years after the study ends. Participants' identifying information (names and contact information) will not be included in shared data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will use a matched-pair randomization approach in which venues will be recruited in pairs, matched by location, type (e.g., bar, nightclub, brewery), and size, and then randomized (1:1) to intervention or wait-list control. Intervention venues will be offered Safe Bars training after baseline data collection; wait-list control venues will be offered Safe Bars training after the 6-month follow-up data collection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline to 6 months |
| Staff perceived safety of the venue | Average of 5 items on a 1-5 scale; higher scores indicate less perceived safety | Baseline to 6 months |
| Patron perceived safety of the venue | Average of 5 items on a 1-5 scale; higher scores indicate less perceived safety | Baseline to 6 months |
| Patron witnessing venue staff intervention | Proportion of opportunities (out of 17 possible) in which patrons reported that they saw staff intervene in a risky situation | Baseline to 6 months |
| Georgia State University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30302 | United States |
|
| RTI International | Durham | North Carolina | 27713 | United States |
|