Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Carlos III Health Institute | OTHER_GOV |
| European Regional Development Fund | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of both ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) has shown to be an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET). Characterizing the differences between both targets is necessary. The aim of the study is comparison of efficacy, safety, energy efficiency, neuropsychological status and quality of life of bilateral PSA-DBS vs bilateral VIM-DBS in the treatment of ET. The study hypothesis is that PSA-DBS is not inferior to VIM-DBS in terms of efficacy in controlling tremor, but has superior energy efficiency and safety.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus is an effective treatment for disabling essential tremor (ET). In recent years, the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) has emerged as a potentially more effective target. There is a need for specific research into the clinical efficacy, efficiency, as well as the mid-term cognitive and quality-of-life outcomes of VIM-DBS and PSA-DBS. The aim of this study is: 1) to compare the efficacy and safety of bilateral PSA-DBS versus bilateral VIM-DBS in the treatment of ET. 2) to determine the impact of bilateral PSA-DBS versus bilateral VIM-DBS on quality of life, neuropsychological status, energy efficiency of the DBS system, and durability of the tremor-suppressing effect. The hypothesis is that PSA-DBS is not inferior to VIM-DBS in terms of efficacy in controlling tremor, but has superior energy efficiency and safety. To this end, a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial will be conducted, in which bilateral octopolar DBS leads will be implanted in a single-trajectory covering the VIM and PSA in patients with disabling and refractory ET. They will be randomly assigned to group 1 (PSA-VIM) or group 2 (VIM-PSA), undergoing stimulation on each target for 3 months. A blinded assessment will be carried out at the end of each period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| VIM-DBS | Active Comparator | Stimulation delivered to VIM |
|
| PSA-DBS | Experimental | Stimulation delivered to PSA |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) | Device | Bilateral implantation of octopolar DBS leads covering VIM and PSA |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in tremor assessed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) total score | Improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period, assessed as the FTM-TRS total score (0-144 points; higher scores indicate greater tremor severity). | - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulation efficiency assessed by stimulation amplitudes (mA) | Stimulation efficiency measured by stimulation amplitudes (mA). The greater the amplitude, the higher the energy consumption (lower theoretical energy efficiency) | 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Majed Jouma Katati, PhD | Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Granada University (Granada, Spain). Department of Neurosurgery, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain) | Principal Investigator |
| Francisco Escamilla Sevilla | Department of Neurology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Neurotraumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital) | Granada | Granada | 18013 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29970404 | Background | Barbe MT, Reker P, Hamacher S, Franklin J, Kraus D, Dembek TA, Becker J, Steffen JK, Allert N, Wirths J, Dafsari HS, Voges J, Fink GR, Visser-Vandewalle V, Timmermann L. DBS of the PSA and the VIM in essential tremor: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Neurology. 2018 Aug 7;91(6):e543-e550. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005956. Epub 2018 Jul 3. |
Not provided
Not provided
The data are not publicly available due to the risk of breached patient confidentiality
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 19, 2019 | Mar 29, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 7, 2019 | Apr 7, 2026 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020329 | Essential Tremor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046690 | Deep Brain Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Stimulation efficiency measured by total electrical energy delivered (TEED) | TEED (μJ) = [(I² · R · PW · f) 1e-6], where DBS parameters are frequency (f, Hz), pulse width (PW, μsec), impedance (R, Ω) and current intensity (I, mA). The higher the TEED, the lower the energy efficiency. | 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |
| Quality of life (QoL) assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Change from baseline to the end of the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period assessed using VAS-QoL (1-10; higher scores indicate better QoL) | - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |
| Quality of life (QoL) assessed using the Quality of life in essential tremor questionnaire (QUEST) | Change from baseline to the end of the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period assessed using the QUEST (1-120; higher scores indicate poor QoL) | - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |
| Number and type of stimulation-induced side effects | Type and frequency (absolute and relative) of stimulation-induced side effects in the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period | - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |
| Overall cognitive assessment evaluated using the Dementia Rating Scale 2 (DRS-2) | Change in cognition from baseline to the end of the VIM-DBS vs PSA-DBS period assessed using the DRS-2 (1-144; higher scores indicate better cognitive performance) | - Preoperative baseline, - 4 postoperative months (after the first 3-month stimulation period) and - 7 postoperative months (after the second 3-month stimulation period) |