Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
compare the accuracy and sensitivity of 18F FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT in detecting distant metastases in breast cancer
Breast cancer is the most common cancer type and the most common cause of death in women worldwide.
Breast cancer patients with large tumours (T3) have a 8.3%-15.1% risk for distant metastasis. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is considered an incurable disease with a 5-year overall survival of only 25%.
Effective management of breast cancer requires accurate diagnosis and determination of the extent of the disease to select the most effective treatment approach. Breast cancer is very heterogenous and is characterized by different pathological features, with distinct responses to treatment and differences in long-term patient survival.
Various imaging modalities have been suggested for diagnosing MBC; however, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and bone scintigraphy are often used in clinical practice. However, CE-CT has low sensitivity for bone metastases and low specificity for liver metastases.
CE-CT and the corresponding response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) are methods that assess changes in structural lesions, making it challenging to differentiate between active tumour tissue and scar lesions [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F] FDG-PET/CT) is a glucose analog transported via glucose transporters into the cells and phosphorylated by hexokinase .FDG follows the same pathway as glucose during the first enzymatic reactions in the cells, but because FDG lacks a hydroxyl group at the C-2 position, it is not metabolized further and is physically trapped in tumor cells at a rate proportional to glucose utilization.
Malignant cells show higher glucose metabolism and increased glycolytic activity compared to non-malignant cells (10). This high glycolytic activity eases the detection of malignant cells using [18F] FDG-PET/CT) imaging. so, [18F] FDG-PET/CT can detect changes in metabolic activity before morphologic changes can be seen.
However, the exact clinical stage at which PET/CT can be performed with well-balanced cost-effectiveness is uncertain till now .
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast cancer Patients | 18 FDG PET CT scan for metastatic breast cancer |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting distant metastases. | Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting distant metastases. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Early staging and clinical management of breast cancer in attempt to improve survival and quality of life | Early staging and clinical management of breast cancer in attempt to improve survival and quality of life | 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
patients with metastatic breast cancer
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seham Sharef Eid, Master's degree | Contact | 00201097515105 | Seham.14224009@med.aun.edu.eg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hebatallah Ahmed Abdelraof, Professor | nuclear medicine unit Assiut university | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21765193 | Background | Niikura N, Costelloe CM, Madewell JE, Hayashi N, Yu TK, Liu J, Palla SL, Tokuda Y, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. FDG-PET/CT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1111-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0089. Epub 2011 Jul 17. | |
| 29516387 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, Werner TJ, Alavi A. The Evolving Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Feb;21(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3. |
| 26854143 | Background | Vercher-Conejero JL, Pelegri-Martinez L, Lopez-Aznar D, Cozar-Santiago Mdel P. Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2015 Mar 16;5(1):61-83. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics5010061. |
| 15133636 | Background | Zangheri B, Messa C, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Landoni C, Fazio F. PET/CT and breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Jun;31 Suppl 1:S135-42. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1536-7. Epub 2004 May 5. |
| 36207136 | Background | Vogsen M, Harbo F, Jakobsen NM, Nissen HJ, Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE, Gerke O, Jensen JD, Asmussen JT, Jylling AMB, Braad PE, Vach W, Ewertz M, Hildebrandt MG. Response Monitoring in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study Comparing 18F-FDG PET/CT with Conventional CT. J Nucl Med. 2023 Mar;64(3):355-361. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263358. Epub 2022 Oct 7. |
| 33812473 | Background | Loibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, Denkert C, Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32381-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1. |
| 36832085 | Background | Hadebe B, Harry L, Ebrahim T, Pillay V, Vorster M. The Role of PET/CT in Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;13(4):597. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040597. |
| 32979513 | Background | Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, Curigliano G, Aapro MS, Andre F, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bhattacharyya GS, Biganzoli L, Boyle F, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, El Saghir NS, Elzayat M, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Gelmon K, Gligorov J, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaufman B, Kaur R, Kiely BE, Kim SB, Lin NU, Mertz SA, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Prat A, Penault-Llorca F, Rugo HS, Sledge GW, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Wiseman T, Xu B, Norton L, Costa A, Winer EP. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1623-1649. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 23. No abstract available. |
| 21351269 | Background | Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |