Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if imageless navigation is not inferior to image-based navigation in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) for treating patients with knee osteoarthritis.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
Participants will:
The trial will include patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, qualified for Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (RA-TKA). For each patient, a full-length standing radiograph will be taken with designated sensors. Based on these, a three-dimensional model of the knee joint will be generated, enabling preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation in the image-based mode. Patients who meet the criteria and provide informed consent will be included in the study. Immediately before surgery, patients will be randomly assigned by a computer programme to either the experimental or control group in a 1:1 ratio, remaining blinded to the chosen method. In the experimental group, RA-TKA will be performed using imageless navigation, whereas in the control group, it will be performed using image-based navigation. In both groups, the procedure will be performed by experienced specialists with several years of experience, according to a standardized protocol: a medial parapatellar approach with restricted kinematic alignment, using a medial congruent knee implant.
The total number of patients included in the study is planned to be 146, with 73 in the experimental group and 73 in the control group. The group size was calculated based on a power analysis; power level: 80%, significance level: α=0.05, minimal clinically important difference: 5 points on the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), standard deviation: 10 points on the OKS. The study's dropout rate is estimated at 15%.
Radiologic imaging, survey responses, and intraoperative records will be stored on physical disks and paper, as well as in a secure cloud-based database. All other records will be stored digitally only. Registry data will be compared with external data sources (medical records) every 6 months to assess their accuracy and completeness. A Linear Mixed-Effects Model will be used to account for correlation between OKS measurements in the same patient. Both Per-Protocol and Intention-to-Treat analyses will be reported. For comparing continuous variables, a t-test (if normally distributed) or a Mann-Whitney U test (if skewed) will be used. Categorical variables will be compared with Fisher's Exact Test or the Chi-squared test. A cost-minimization analysis will be conducted using economic data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imageless Robotic Navigation | Active Comparator |
| |
| Image-based Robotic Navigation | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imageless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty | Procedure | Patients undergoing Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Imageless Navigation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-Reported Outcome Measures assessed with the Oxford Knee Score | Zero is equivalent to the worst possible function of the joint and 48 indicates the best achievable function. | Survey taken right before surgery, at 6 months, and at 12 months after surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Range of motion | Measured according to the neutral-zero method with a 360-degree goniometer. | On admission to the hospital, the day after surgery, at 6 months, and at 12 months postoperatively. |
| Number of Participants achieving a planned postoperative limb alignment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paweł Kasprzak, MD | Contact | 22 50 21 514 | +48 | pawel.kasprzak@wum.edu.pl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paweł Łęgosz, MD, Professor | Medical University of Warsaw | Principal Investigator |
| Łukasz Pulik, MD, PhD | Medical University of Warsaw | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Orthopedics and Locomotor Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw | Warsaw | Mazovian | 02-005 | Poland |
De-identified study results will be disseminated in conference abstracts and peer-reviewed journal articles.
Within 12 months of the trial completion.
Data and supporting information will be shared upon reasonable request to the Principal Investigator. After the Principal Investigator reviews and approves the applicant's request, de-identified information will be provided.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Image-based Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty | Procedure | Patients undergoing Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with Image-based Navigation |
|
The percentage of patients within ±3 degrees of the preoperative target. |
| From enrollment to 12 months after surgery. |
| Postoperative radiographic results | Hip-Knee-Ankle angle, mechanical axis deviation, coronal femoral component angle (mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle), sagittal femoral tilt/flexion, coronal tibial component angle (mechanical/anatomical lateral distal tibial angle, mechanical/anatomical medial proximal tibial angle) posterior tibial slope, joint line convergence angle, all measured in degrees | From enrollment to 12 months after surgery. |
| Postoperative pain assessed with a VAS scale | Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. | Survey taken right before surgery, at 6 months, and at 12 months after surgery. |
| Time of the surgical procedure | Duration of the surgical procedure in total and for each stage measured in minutes. | From the beginning to the end of the surgical procedure. |
| Estimation of perioperative blood loss | Intra-operative blood loss estimation by measuring the blood volume accumulated in suction bottles in milliliters, taking into account the volume of saline solution used during the surgery. | Immediately after the end of the surgery. |
| Difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels | Hemoglobin levels will be obtained from samples taken at different times before and after surgery. | Hemoglobin levels will be measured within 2 weeks before surgery, as well as 24, 48 and 72 hours after surgery. |
| Postoperative complications | The percentage of cases with reported postoperative complications, such as: bleeding, wound complication, thromboembolic disease, neural deficit, vascular injury, ligament injury, instability, malalignment, stiffness, periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, extensor mechanism disruption, dislocation, bearing surface wear, osteolysis, implant loosening, revision, death. | From enrollment to 12 months after surgery. |
| Costs required for preoperative planning | Costs of all preoperative imaging and procedures necessary to plan imageless and image-based robotic navigation. | From one month before enrollment to 12 months after surgery. |
| Time required for preoperative planning | Time required to prepare all preoperative imaging and procedures necessary to plan imageless and image-based robotic navigation. | From one month before enrollment to 12 months after surgery. |
| Paweł Kasprzak, MD |
| Medical University of Warsaw |
| Principal Investigator |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided