Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study tests whether patients with blood cancer or other cancers better understand their medical information when it is rewritten in plain language by an artificial intelligence (AI) system.
When patients are discharged from the hospital, they receive a medical letter summarizing their diagnosis, treatment, and next steps. These letters are often written in technical language that is difficult for patients to understand. In this study, an AI language model running on the hospital's own secure servers rewrites parts of this letter into simpler language. A physician checks the simplified version before the patient receives it.
Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group receives both the standard medical letter and the AI-simplified version. The other group receives the standard letter only. A separate group of patients who do not speak German well will receive a simplified and translated version.
After reading their letter, all participants fill out a short questionnaire about how well they understood the information. The study takes place at TUM University Hospital (Klinikum rechts der Isar) in Munich, Germany.
Background:
Studies show that up to 40-80% of medical information conveyed during physician consultations is not correctly recalled or understood by patients. This problem is particularly relevant in hematology and oncology, where treatment regimens, prognoses, and side-effect profiles are complex. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to convert medical texts into plain language with high accuracy. However, prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical benefit of LLM-simplified patient synopses in routine care are lacking.
Study Design:
Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial with parallel group design. Randomization is 2:1 (intervention : control) using permuted blocks of variable size (4-6). An additional non-randomized translation arm enrolls patients with insufficient German language proficiency.
Intervention:
The locally implemented LLM system (on-premise, no external data transmission) automatically simplifies the following sections of the discharge letter: Current Status, Medical History, Epicrisis, and Further Management. A study physician reviews and approves the simplified version before it is given to the patient. The system is not classified as a medical device and is not used for diagnosis or treatment decisions.
Endpoints:
The primary endpoint is a comprehension score measured by a 5-item scale (10-point Likert, based on PEMAT), assessing overall comprehension and comprehension of diagnosis, treatment, next steps, and medical terminology. Secondary endpoints include patient satisfaction (EORTC QLQ-INFO25 subscales), subjective uncertainty reduction, format preference, physician review time, correction rate, and translation quality.
Statistical Analysis:
The primary endpoint will be analyzed using a t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. A clinically relevant difference of 1.5 points on the 10-point scale is assumed. With a standard deviation of 2.5, power of 80%, and alpha of 0.05 (two-sided), 136 randomized patients are required (91 intervention, 45 control). Accounting for a 10% dropout rate, 150 patients will be recruited for the randomized arms, plus 30 for the translation arm (total n=180).
Data Protection:
All data are pseudonymized and stored on secure hospital servers. No patient data are transmitted to external servers or cloud services. The study complies with GDPR.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention: LLM-Simplified Synopsis | Experimental | Participants receive the standard discharge letter synopsis plus an LLM-generated plain-language version of the following sections: Current Status, Medical History, Epicrisis, and Further Management. The simplified version is reviewed and approved by a study physician before being given to the patient. |
|
| Control: Standard Synopsis | No Intervention | Participants receive the standard discharge letter synopsis only, as provided in routine clinical care. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM-Generated Plain-Language Patient Synopsis | Other | A locally implemented large language model (GPT-OSS, on-premise) automatically rewrites selected sections of the hospital discharge letter (Current Status, Medical History, Epicrisis, and Further Management) into plain language. A study physician reviews the output for accuracy before it is provided to the patient. The system is not classified as a medical device and is not used for diagnosis or treatment decisions. No patient data are transmitted to external servers. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Comprehension Score | Comprehension of the patient synopsis measured using a 5-item scale based on the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT; scores range from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better comprehension), assessing overall comprehension and comprehension of diagnosis, treatment, next steps, and medical terminology. The score is calculated as the mean of all five items (range 0-10; higher scores indicate better comprehension). | At the time of hospital discharge (Day 0), assessed immediately after reading the synopsis (approximately 15-30 minutes after receipt) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Satisfaction with Information Received | Patient satisfaction (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Information Module 25 [EORTC QLQ-INFO25] subscales; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better-perceived information) | Day 0, assessed immediately after reading the synopsis |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krischan Braitsch, MD | Contact | +49 089 4140 1268 | krischan.braitsch@tum.de | |
| Lisa C. Adams, MD | Contact | +49 089 4140 1084 | lisa.adams@tum.de |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical University Munich | Recruiting | Munich | Bavaria | 81675 | Germany |
Individual participant data will not be shared. All study data are pseudonymized and stored on secure hospital servers at TUM University Hospital (Klinikum rechts der Isar) in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The study protocol does not provide for disclosure of participant-level data to third parties. Aggregate, anonymized data will be made available through publication of results.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 18, 2026 | Apr 4, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019337 | Hematologic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
2:1 block randomization (intervention : control) with permuted blocks of variable size (4-6). A separate exploratory translation component may be conducted for patients with insufficient German language proficiency, subject to operational feasibility. This component is non-randomized and descriptive only.
Not provided
Not provided
Blinding of participants and care providers is not possible, as the intervention group receives a visibly additional simplified synopsis. Questionnaire data are analyzed blinded to group assignment.
|
| Subjective Uncertainty Reduction | Single-item measure on a 0-10 scale, administered before and after reading the synopsis | Day 0, before and after reading the synopsis |
| Patient Preference for Synopsis Format | Categorical variable assessing which synopsis format the patient preferred | Day 0, assessed immediately after reading the synopsis |
| Physician Review Time | Time in minutes required for the study physician to review and approve the LLM-generated synopsis | Day 0, recorded at time of physician review |
| Physician Correction Rate | Rate of necessary corrections made by the study physician to the LLM-generated synopsis prior to patient handout | Day 0, recorded at time of physician review |