Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Calgary | OTHER |
| Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | OTHER_GOV |
| McMaster Children's Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Moving from pediatric (children's) health care to adult health care can be challenging for youth and young adults with eating disorders. Many young people and families report feeling unprepared, unsure of what to expect, and worried about losing support during this time. Gaps in care during this transition can increase stress and make recovery more difficult.
This study is testing a structured transition support program called the TransitionED framework. The goal is to see whether this program can be successfully used in real hospital settings and whether youth, caregivers, and clinicians find it helpful.
The TransitionED framework is designed to help youth and families prepare for the move to adult care. It includes:
Youth who are 16 years or older and currently receiving care in a participating pediatric eating disorder program may be invited to join, along with one caregiver. Clinicians and program leaders will also take part to help deliver and evaluate the program.
Participants will complete surveys at the beginning of the study, about two months later, and six months after finishing the program. Some participants will also take part in interviews to share their experiences.
This study is focused on feasibility. That means the main goal is to learn whether this transition program is practical, acceptable, and workable in everyday clinical care. What we learn will help improve transition support for youth and young adults with eating disorders in the future.
Youth and young adults (YYA) with eating disorders (EDs) face well-documented challenges when transitioning from pediatric to adult-oriented health care systems. Poorly planned transitions are associated with disruptions in continuity of care, reduced engagement with services, and increased clinical risk. In ED populations, these risks may be heightened due to illness severity, developmental vulnerability, differences between pediatric and adult care models, and the high level of caregiver involvement in pediatric treatment.
Despite national and international recommendations supporting structured transition planning, many programs lack consistent, system-level approaches to guide the transition process. As a result, youth and families often report feeling unprepared, excluded from decision-making, and uncertain about what to expect when moving to adult services.
The TransitionED program of research was developed to address these gaps. In Phase 1, Canadian clinical practice guidelines for transitions in eating disorder care were developed. In Phase 2, youth with lived experience, caregivers, clinicians, and system partners participated in a national co-design process to translate these guidelines into a structured healthcare transition framework suitable for real-world implementation.
The current study represents Phase 3 of the TransitionED program and focuses on evaluating the feasibility of implementing the TransitionED framework in two Canadian pediatric eating disorder programs. This is an implementation-focused feasibility study rather than a clinical efficacy trial.
The primary objective is to assess feasibility across multiple domains, guided by Bowen et al.'s feasibility framework. These domains include:
The TransitionED framework is a multi-component, guideline-informed approach designed to support continuity of care. Core components include:
The framework is intentionally flexible to allow for site-specific adaptation while maintaining core components. Any adaptations made during implementation will be documented as part of the feasibility evaluation.
The study uses a convergent mixed methods design. Quantitative data will be collected at baseline, approximately eight weeks after enrollment, and six months later to assess transition readiness and clinical outcomes. Qualitative interviews and focus groups will explore participant experiences, perceived impact, and implementation processes. Findings from both data strands will be integrated to provide a comprehensive assessment of feasibility.
The results of this study will inform refinement of the TransitionED framework and provide essential data to support future larger-scale implementation and effectiveness studies. Ultimately, this work aims to improve continuity of care and transition experiences for youth and young adults with eating disorders.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TransitionED Framework | Experimental | Participants receive the TransitionED framework, a structured, guideline-informed healthcare transition approach for youth and young adults with eating disorders. The framework includes youth and caregiver transition planning packages, at least two clinician-led transition meetings (including coordination with adult providers), a youth-authored Personal Transition Profile to support information transfer, optional peer support sessions for youth and caregivers, and a communication guide to promote collaboration between paediatric and adult services. Framework delivery occurs approximately two months within routine clinical care. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TransitionED Healthcare Transition Framework | Behavioral | The TransitionED Healthcare Transition Framework is a structured, guideline-informed, multi-component intervention designed to support youth and young adults with eating disorders transitioning from pediatric to adult care. Unlike standard transition practices, this framework integrates youth and caregiver transition planning packages, clinician-led structured transition meetings, a youth-authored Personal Transition Profile to support information transfer, optional peer support sessions, and a program-level communication and collaboration guide. The framework is embedded within routine clinical care and focuses on system-level coordination, readiness building, and continuity across pediatric and adult services. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability | Acceptability refers to the extent to which youth and young adults (YYA), caregivers, clinicians, and implementation team members perceive the TransitionED Healthcare Transition Framework as appropriate, satisfactory, and useful. Acceptability will be assessed using qualitative interviews and focus groups conducted with participants following implementation of the framework. Interviews will explore participants' experiences with the framework, perceived usefulness, ease of use, perceived burden, and overall satisfaction with the transition support process. | Post-intervention (approximately 8 weeks after enrollment) and at 6-month follow-up. |
| Implementation Fidelity of the TransitionED Healthcare Transition Framework | Implementation fidelity refers to the extent to which the TransitionED framework is delivered as intended. Fidelity will be measured as the proportion of core intervention components delivered as planned, including completion of the Transition Planning Package, completion of the Personal Transition Profile, and delivery of clinician-facilitated transition meetings. Fidelity data will be collected using structured implementation tracking logs completed by clinicians and research staff. | From enrollment through framework completion (approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment) and throughout the implementation period at each site. |
| Practicality and Integration of the TransitionED Healthcare Transition Framework | Practicality and integration refer to the extent to which the TransitionED framework can be implemented within routine clinical workflows using existing clinical resources. This outcome will be assessed through clinician surveys and qualitative interviews examining feasibility of delivering the framework, perceived fit within existing clinical workflows, time required to deliver framework components, and barriers or facilitators to implementation. | From enrollment through framework completion (approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment) and during the active implementation period at each site. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Transition Readiness (TRAQ) | Transition readiness will be measured using the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ), a validated self-report instrument assessing youths' skills and confidence in managing their health care and navigating adult-oriented services. TRAQ items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater transition readiness. The instrument generates both domain scores and a total score. Change in TRAQ scores over time will be examined. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Youth and Young Adults (YYA):
Caregivers:
Clinicians (intervention deliverers):
Implementation Team Members:
Exclusion Criteria:
YYA:
Caregivers:
Clinicians and Implementation Team Members:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Couturier, MD, MSc | Contact | 905-521-2100 | 76035 | coutur@mcmaster.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Couturier, MD, MSc | McMaster University | Principal Investigator |
| Georgina Dimitropoulos, MSW, PhD, RSW | University of Calgary | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Calgary | Calgary | Alberta | T2N 1N4 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Guetterman TC, FÃ bregues S, Sakakibara R. Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods in Psychology. 2021;5:100080. | ||
| Background | Fetters MD, Tajima C. Joint displays of integrated data collection in mixed methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2022;21:16094069221104564. | ||
| 24279835 | Background | Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23. | |
| 16204405 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data (IPD) collected in this study include questionnaire responses, implementation tracking data, and qualitative interview data from youth and young adults with eating disorders, caregivers, clinicians, and implementation team members. Due to the sensitive nature of the population and the inclusion of qualitative interview data, there is a potential risk of participant re-identification even after de-identification, particularly given the small sample size and site-specific implementation context. For this reason, qualitative interview data and identifiable information will not be shared outside the research team. De-identified quantitative data derived from standardized questionnaires may be considered for sharing in the future, subject to investigator review and in accordance with institutional policies, research ethics board requirements, and participant consent provisions, with appropriate safeguards to protect participant confidentiality.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001068 | Feeding and Eating Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-arm feasibility study in which all enrolled youth and young adult (YYA) + caregiver dyads receive the TransitionED framework. There is no randomization and no comparison group. The study uses a repeated measures design, with quantitative data collected at baseline, approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment, and 6 months later. Qualitative interviews and focus groups are conducted following framework delivery to assess acceptability, implementation, practicality, and integration. The primary aim is to evaluate feasibility of implementation within routine clinical care settings.
Not provided
Not provided
No parties are masked in this study. This is an open-label feasibility study. Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors are aware of framework delivery.
Not provided
|
|
| Baseline (at enrollment), approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment, and 6 months post-enrollment. |
| Eating Disorder Symptoms | Eating disorder symptom severity will be measured using the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0), a validated self-report instrument widely used in eating disorder research and clinical care. The EDE-Q generates a global score and four subscale scores (restraint, eating concern, weight concern, and shape concern). Items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater eating disorder symptom severity. Change in EDE-Q scores over time will be examined. | Baseline (at enrollment), approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment, and 6 months post-enrollment. |
| Anxiety | Anxiety symptom severity will be measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 produces a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity. Change in GAD-7 scores over time will be examined. | Baseline (at enrollment), approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment, and 6 months post-enrollment. |
| Depression | Depressive symptom severity will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 produces a total score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom burden. Change in PHQ-9 scores over time will be examined. | Baseline (at enrollment), approximately 8 weeks post-enrollment, and 6 months post-enrollment. |
| Transition Outcomes | Early transition outcomes will be assessed using participant report and clinical documentation to examine continuity of care following transfer from pediatric to adult services. Outcomes may include attendance at the first scheduled adult care appointment, time from pediatric discharge to adult intake, engagement in adult services within 3 months of transfer, and participant-reported satisfaction with the transition process. | Assessed at 6 months post-enrollment and following transfer to adult-oriented care (where applicable). |
| McMaster University | Hamilton | Ontario | L8N3Z5 | Canada |
|
| Background |
| Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. |
| 29204457 | Background | Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Nov 24;4:2333393617742282. doi: 10.1177/2333393617742282. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec. |
| 20014004 | Background | Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1002/nur.20362. |
| 10940958 | Background | Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:43.0.co;2-g. |
| Background | Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications; 2017. |
| 19362699 | Background | Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002. |
| 40722124 | Background | Dimitropoulos G, Nicula M, Krishnapillai A, Austin A, Singh M, Lee J, Webb C, Scott S, de Almeida ACV, Bergmann C, Vander Steen H, Kimber M, Mushquash C, Norman L, Sauerwein J, Keshen A, Boachie A, Toulany A, Levinson A, Federici A, Allemang B, Ford C, Katzman DK, Tam E, McVey G, Steiger H, Scarborough J, Coelho JS, Thannhauser J, Geller J, Darnay K, Henderson J, Bright K, Soper K, Isserlin L, Booij L, Brouwers M, Laliberte M, Jericho M, Obeid N, Smith S, Grewal S, MacEachern S, Findlay S, Preskow W, Spettigue W, Maharaj A, Wozney L, Iyer S, Norris M, Vallianatos H, Jones S, Lacroix E, Ferrari M, Steinegger C, Loewen T, Gusella J, LeClerc A, Johnson N, Phillips S, Patton M, Punjwani Z, Greer K, Bhatnagar N, Couturier J. Transitions for youth and young adults with eating disorders and/or other mental health conditions: a Canadian guideline. J Eat Disord. 2025 Jul 28;13(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01343-6. |
| 37690096 | Background | Dimitropoulos G, Singh M, Mushquash C, Kimber M, Hutt-MacLeod D, Moore EK, Perri A, Webb C, Norman L, Sauerwein J, Nicula M, Couturier J. TransitionED: A protocol for Co-designing and implementing Canadian practice guidelines for transitions for youth with eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2025 Nov;33(6):1175-1189. doi: 10.1002/erv.3026. Epub 2023 Sep 10. |
| 34122164 | Background | Nadarajah A, Dimitropoulos G, Grant C, Webb C, Couturier J. Impending Transition From Pediatric to Adult Health Services: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Adolescents With Eating Disorders and Their Caregivers. Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 26;12:624942. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.624942. eCollection 2021. |
| 25402167 | Background | Dimitropoulos G, Toulany A, Herschman J, Kovacs A, Steinegger C, Bardsley J, Sandhu S, Gregory C, Colton P, Anderson J, Kaufman M. A qualitative study on the experiences of young adults with eating disorders transferring from pediatric to adult care. Eat Disord. 2015;23(2):144-62. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2014.976106. Epub 2014 Nov 17. |
| 22431280 | Background | Dimitropoulos G, Tran AF, Agarwal P, Sheffield B, Woodside B. Navigating the transition from pediatric to adult eating disorder programs: perspectives of service providers. Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Sep;45(6):759-67. doi: 10.1002/eat.22017. Epub 2012 Mar 19. |
| 16260812 | Background | Treasure J, Schmidt U, Hugo P. Mind the gap: service transition and interface problems for patients with eating disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;187:398-400. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.5.398. |
| 20884954 | Background | Singh SP, Paul M, Ford T, Kramer T, Weaver T, McLaren S, Hovish K, Islam Z, Belling R, White S. Process, outcome and experience of transition from child to adult mental healthcare: multiperspective study. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;197(4):305-12. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.075135. |
| 30294756 | Background | Cleverley K, Rowland E, Bennett K, Jeffs L, Gore D. Identifying core components and indicators of successful transitions from child to adult mental health services: a scoping review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;29(2):107-121. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1213-1. Epub 2018 Oct 8. |