A Comparison Between Safety and Efficacy of Theophylline, Versus Sumatriptan and Gabapentin in The Treatment of Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Study
A Comparison Between Safety and Efficacy of Theophylline, Versus Sumatriptan and Gabapentin in The Treatment of Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Study
The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of theophylline, sumatriptan, and gabapentin in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache.
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a frequent complication of spinal anaesthesia or dural puncture and is an uncomfortable situation for both the patient and the anesthetist.
Theophylline as a form of methyl xanthine, is an adenosine receptor antagonist and can decrease intracranial blood flow and venous enlargement. Evidence shows that intravenous theophylline infusion is a rapid, effective, non-invasive, practical, and low-cost method to treat post-spinal headache.
Sumatriptan is a selective agonist of 5-hydroxytrytamine-like receptors and is used in the treatment of migraine. It has been used in the treatment of PDPH where it may prevent cerebral vasodilation associated with the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.
Gabapentin is a structural analogue of gamma amino butyric acid; it was used as an anticonvulsant drug for the first time. This drug is now applied in diabetic neuropathy, neuropathic cancer pain and inflammatory injury.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
asmaaragabeid@gmail.com00201026382543