Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study investigates whether Kinesio Taping has immediate effects on upper extremity performance in healthy adults and whether these effects may be influenced by placebo mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping, sham Kinesio Taping, or no intervention.
All participants complete tests of hand function, including grip strength, typing performance, reaction time, and manual dexterity, before and after a short standardized waiting period. Participants also rate their perceived performance, comfort, and overall change.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether improvements in performance are due to the mechanical effects of the tape or related to sensory and expectation-based (placebo) factors.
This study is a single-blind, three-arm randomized controlled trial designed to investigate the immediate effects of Kinesio Taping on upper extremity motor performance and perceived function in healthy adults, and to explore the potential contribution of placebo-related mechanisms. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping applied with tension, sham Kinesio Taping applied without tension, or a no-intervention control condition.
The intervention targets the wrist extensor musculature of the dominant upper extremity. Both taping conditions follow the same application procedure and positioning, differing only in the level of tension to isolate the mechanical versus perceptual effects of the tape. The control group follows the same testing timeline without receiving any intervention.
Outcome measures are collected at baseline and immediately after a standardized 20-minute waiting period. Objective measures include maximal grip strength, typing performance, choice reaction time, and manual dexterity. Subjective measures include perceived performance, task ease, comfort, and global rating of change.
The study is conducted in a controlled and standardized testing environment with consistent equipment, procedures, and instructions across participants. This design allows for the comparison of objective performance outcomes with subjective perceptions, providing insight into the relationship between mechanical and placebo effects in Kinesio Taping applications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic Kinesio Taping | Experimental | Participants receive Kinesio Taping applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity using approximately 25% therapeutic tension, following a standardized application protocol. |
|
| Sham Kinesio Taping | Sham Comparator | Participants receive Kinesio Taping applied to the same anatomical region using an identical procedure but without tension, to simulate the intervention without therapeutic effect. |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Participants do not receive any taping intervention and remain seated in a standardized position for 20 minutes before post-intervention assessments. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinesio Taping | Device | Elastic therapeutic tape applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity using approximately 25% tension according to a standardized application protocol. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal Grip Strength | Maximal grip strength of the dominant hand measured in kilograms using a digital hand dynamometer. The highest value from three trials is recorded. | Baseline and immediately post-intervention (within 2-3 minutes after a 20-minute waiting period) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Typing Performance (Corrected Words Per Minute) and Accuracy | Typing speed measured using a standardized computer-based typing task; corrected words per minute calculated by accounting for errors And Typing accuracy measured as the percentage of correct entries during a standardized typing task. | Baseline and immediately post-intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abeer Mohamed Abdulla Sayed, BSc (Physiotherapy and Rehabil | Contact | +90 552 872 2754 | +974 33686496 | 2433095052@stu.istinye.edu.tr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Begüm kara Kaya, PhD | Biruni University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istinye University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Application and Research Center (ISUFIZYOTEM) | Istanbul | Istanbul | 34010 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups: therapeutic Kinesio Taping, sham Kinesio Taping, or no-intervention control. Each participant remains in their assigned group for the duration of the study. Outcome measures are assessed at baseline and immediately after a standardized 20-minute period, allowing comparison of changes between groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants assigned to the taping groups are blinded to whether they receive therapeutic or sham Kinesio Taping. The sham application mimics the appearance and procedure of real taping but is applied without tension to maintain blinding. Due to the inclusion of a no-intervention control group, complete masking across all study arms is not feasible.
| Sham Kinesio Taping | Device | Elastic tape applied to the wrist extensor muscles of the dominant upper extremity without tension, using the same placement and procedure as the therapeutic intervention to mimic sensory and procedural aspects without intended therapeutic effect. |
|
| Choice Reaction Time |
Reaction time measured in milliseconds using a computer-based Go/No-Go task, calculated as the mean response time for correct trials. |
| Baseline and immediately post-intervention |
| Manual Dexterity (Nine-Hole Peg Test) | Fine motor dexterity assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test; fastest completion time recorded in seconds. | Baseline and immediately post-intervention |
| Perceived Performance Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Self-reported perceived performance measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no perceived improvement and 100 indicates maximum perceived improvement. Higher scores indicate better perceived performance. | Immediately post-intervention |
| Task Ease Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Self-reported task ease measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates much harder, 50 indicates no change, and 100 indicates much easier. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ease of task performance. | Immediately post-intervention |
| Comfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Self-reported comfort measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates extremely uncomfortable and 100 indicates extremely comfortable. Higher scores indicate greater comfort. | Immediately post-intervention |
| Global Rating of Change (GRC) | Participant-reported overall perceived change measured using a 15-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale ranging from -7 (vastly worse) to 0 (no change) to +7 (vastly better). Higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement. | Immediately post-intervention |