Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether repeated cisplatin-based PIPAC added to standard TC chemotherapy can improve outcomes in women aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed FIGO IIIB-IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer and visually detectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. The main questions are whether repeated PIPAC increases the rate of complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) and whether it improves disease control, survival outcomes, and safety compared with standard combined treatment including a single PIPAC procedure. Participants will undergo screening, intraoperative randomization, systemic chemotherapy, PIPAC procedures according to study arm, interval cytoreductive surgery, protocol-specified postoperative treatment if needed, and regular follow-up assessments.
Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is frequently accompanied by peritoneal carcinomatosis, which is a major determinant of treatment failure and poor long-term prognosis. Although systemic platinum-taxane chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery remain the foundation of first-line management, outcomes are substantially worse when intraperitoneal tumor burden is high and complete cytoreduction is difficult to achieve. In this setting, additional locoregional treatment strategies may help improve intraperitoneal disease control while preserving the feasibility of multimodal therapy. The present study evaluates pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as an investigational component of combined first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination.
PIPAC delivers intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol during laparoscopy and is intended to enhance spatial distribution and tissue penetration of the drug while limiting systemic exposure. In this protocol, cisplatin-based PIPAC is integrated into the treatment pathway at predefined operative stages together with standard TC systemic chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled phase II trial comparing a strategy of repeated PIPAC incorporated across the course of induction and surgical treatment with a comparison strategy in which PIPAC is delivered only once during interval cytoreductive surgery. The protocol also includes further protocol-directed treatment for patients in whom complete cytoreduction is not achieved.
At the diagnostic operative stage, disease extent is documented using intra-abdominal assessment including ascites evaluation, mapping of visceral and parietal peritoneal involvement, and calculation of the Peritoneal Cancer Index. Peritoneal, ovarian, and omental tissue samples are obtained for histologic verification and subsequent treatment-response assessment. PIPAC is administered laparoscopically under general anesthesia using cisplatin diluted in normal saline, delivered into a carbon dioxide capnoperitoneum under controlled pressure and flow conditions with a fixed exposure time. Interval cytoreductive surgery is planned after induction treatment, and when indicated, an additional intraoperative PIPAC procedure is performed before abdominal-wall closure.
Throughout the study, participants undergo protocol-defined clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathologic evaluations during treatment and follow-up. Serial reassessment of intraperitoneal disease, biopsy-based morphologic evaluation, tumor-marker monitoring, and adverse-event documentation are used to characterize treatment activity and tolerability over time. Follow-up continues at regular intervals after completion of therapy and includes oncologic surveillance and quality-of-life assessment. Safety oversight includes detailed documentation of adverse events and specific operating-room precautions intended to minimize occupational exposure during aerosolized intraperitoneal chemotherapy procedures. Study conduct, documentation, and confidentiality are governed by protocol-defined data-management procedures and ethical requirements, including written informed consent and ethics committee approval before study initiation and for major protocol amendments.
This trial is intended not only to evaluate the clinical contribution of repeated PIPAC in the first-line setting, but also to refine a practical treatment sequence for combining intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, interval surgery, and postoperative management in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test group with 3 PIPAC procedures | Experimental | Participants undergo a multimodal treatment sequence consisting of diagnostic laparoscopy with multifocal peritoneal biopsy, repeated PIPAC procedures, systemic TC chemotherapy, and cytoreductive surgery. At Visit 1, participants receive diagnostic laparoscopy, multifocal peritoneal biopsy, the first PIPAC session, and the first cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. Visit 2 includes the second cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. At Visit 3, participants undergo the second PIPAC session and receive the third cycle of TC chemotherapy. At Visit 4, participants undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS), the third PIPAC session, and the fourth cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. In patients achieving complete cytoreduction (CRS R0), treatment is followed by Visits 5 and 6, corresponding to the fifth and sixth cycles of TC chemotherapy. |
|
| Control group with 1 PIPAC procedure | Active Comparator | Participants undergo a multimodal treatment sequence consisting of diagnostic laparoscopy with multifocal peritoneal biopsy, systemic TC chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery, and a single PIPAC procedure. At Visit 1, participants undergo diagnostic laparoscopy, multifocal peritoneal biopsy, and receive the first cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. Visit 2 includes the second cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. At Visit 3, participants receive the third cycle of TC chemotherapy. At Visit 4, participants undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS), a single PIPAC procedure, and the fourth cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. In patients achieving complete cytoreduction (CRS R0), treatment is continued with Visits 5 and 6, corresponding to the fifth and sixth cycles of TC chemotherapy. |
|
| Crossover group with additional PIPAC | Active Comparator | Participants from either randomized arm who have incomplete cytoreduction (CRS R2) at Visit 4 enter a crossover treatment branch. After cytoreductive surgery, treatment is continued with postoperative TC chemotherapy. At Visit 5, participants receive the fifth cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. At Visit 6, participants undergo one additional PIPAC procedure followed by the sixth cycle of intravenous TC chemotherapy. This crossover branch is intended for participants in whom complete cytoreduction is not achieved. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIPAC | Procedure | Performed laparoscopically under general anesthesia. Drug: cisplatin 30 mg/m² diluted in 180 mL normal saline Administration:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) | The proportion of participants who achieve complete surgical cytoreduction (CRS R0) at interval cytoreductive surgery. | At interval cytoreductive surgery (Visit 4), approximately 9 to 12 weeks after randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | Time from randomization to death from any cause. | From randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment |
| Progression-free survival | Time from randomization to radiologic, clinical, or pathologic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) response | Change in Peritoneal Cancer Index from baseline, categorized according to protocol-defined response criteria: complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progression. | At baseline, before the second PIPAC procedure (approximately 6 weeks after randomization), and at interval cytoreductive surgery (approximately 9 to 12 weeks after randomization) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexey S. Dzasokhov, MD, PhD | Contact | +79295596135 | dzasokhov-pipac@mail.ru |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alexey S. Dzasokhov, MD, PhD | Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary | Principal Investigator |
| Sergei O. Gunyakov | Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moscow Regional Oncological Dispensary | Recruiting | Balashikha | 14390 | Russia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 21, 2026 | Mar 31, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010534 | Peritoneal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000008 | Abdominal Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
The study has three arms: one arm is the neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy and CRS, the second is the neoadjuvant PIPAC test arm, intravenous chemotherapy and CRS, the third arm consists of patients from both groups with CRS R2 (the group with added PIPAC after the 5th course of intravenous chemotherapy)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| From randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment |
| Recurrence rate | Proportion of participants with documented disease recurrence after completion of protocol treatment. | From completion of treatment through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years Recurrence rate is named among the secondary endpoints. |
| Time to progression | Time from randomization to first documented disease progression. | From randomization through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment |
| Ascites response | Rate of ascites accumulation during treatment and follow-up, including change in ascites volume over time. | During treatment through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment The protocol identifies rate of ascites accumulation as a secondary endpoint and also requires ascites-volume assessment at each operative stage. |
| Tumor marker response | Proportion of participants with at least a 50% reduction in tumor-marker levels from baseline. | During treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment The protocol specifies the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in tumor-marker levels as a secondary endpoint. |
| Frequency and severity of adverse events | Incidence, type, and severity of adverse events recorded after informed consent, including treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. | From informed consent through follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment |
| Intestinal paresis | Incidence of postoperative intestinal paresis during protocol treatment. | During treatment, assessed through completion of treatment Intestinal paresis is specifically listed among the secondary endpoints (assessed up to 6 months) |
| Laboratory abnormalities | Incidence and severity of clinically significant hematologic and biochemical laboratory abnormalities during protocol treatment. | During treatment and follow-up, assessed up to 2 years after completion of treatment Laboratory abnormalities are included in the secondary endpoint list, and laboratory testing is performed repeatedly during treatment and follow-up. |
| Wound-healing time | Time to postoperative wound healing after protocol-defined surgical procedures. | From the date of surgery to complete wound healing, assessed up to 30 days after each study-related surgical procedure |
| Morphologic response in peritoneal and omental biopsy specimens | Histologic treatment response assessed in serial biopsy specimens using protocol-defined treatment-regression criteria. | At baseline, before the second PIPAC procedure (approximately 6 weeks after randomization), and at interval cytoreductive surgery (approximately 9 to 12 weeks after randomization) |
| Quality of life | Quality of life assessed using EORTC questionnaires during protocol follow-up. | During follow-up, assessed every 3 months for 2 years after completion of treatment Quality of life is included as a protocol-defined follow-up assessment and is also listed among the correlative studies. |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D010532 | Peritoneal Diseases |