Evaluation of Laparoscopic Staging Versus Staging Laparotomy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Staging Versus Staging Laparotomy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer
Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopy is associated with faster recovery, better visualization, shorter hospital stays, and less possible adhesion formation. But do the safety, efficacy, and morbidity of laparoscopic staging differ from conventional staging laparotomy in endometrial cancer?Is laparoscopic staging considered a safe and effective alternative procedure for the surgical treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma? This study aims to compare the safety, efficacy, and morbidity between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with lymphadenectomy and conventional staging laparotomy for early-stage endometrial cancer.
Primary Outcome: perioperative morbidities:
Secondary outcomes:
Inclusion Criteria:• Inclusion Criteria:
I. Patient histopathological diagnosed early-stage endometrial carcinoma, (stages 1A &1B) according to FIGO classification.
•
-
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
hamadsara358@gmail.con+2001092762108 ext. 01092762108
+2001002745161 ext. 01002745161