Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRB00505816 | Other Identifier | Johns Hopkins IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The Ben & Catherine Ivy Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a research study to determine if a novel molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, called amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, is useful in identifying the most aggressive areas of tumor needed for radiotherapy of brain tumors.
Despite advances in therapy, glioblastoma remains almost universally fatal, with a high rate of local failure and a median survival of < 2 years. The standard of care for GBM is maximum safe surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy (RT) with temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, which was established two decades ago. There is an urgent need to optimize each step of this standard therapy and develop new methods to fight this devastating disease. It is the infiltrative nature of GBM that limits resection and leads to suboptimal RT planning. To address this, neurosurgeons are employing supratotal resection, in which gadolinium-enhancing macroscopic tumor plus 1-2 cm extension into gadolinium-non-enhancing peritumoral regions is resected after preserving the highly eloquent region.
RT planning is complex and varies among medical centers, particularly in terms of inclusion of non-enhancing peritumoral regions in the clinical target volume. Moreover, lack of local therapy intensification of RT is considered one of the factors that prevent this standard therapy from achieving maximal tumor control. New RT approaches, such as focused dose escalation and proton therapy, require the best possible imaging methods to accurately visualize the extent of the tumor. Furthermore, standard structural MRI cannot distinguish between treatment effect from RT and tumor progression. Notably, the treated tumor may have progressed during fractionated RT, and the newly emerging active lesion could be missed from the original RT planning, particularly at the boost phase. New tissue-specific imaging approaches, like amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, that can accurately identify the tumor burden before, during, and after RT treatment are urgently needed.
The investigators central hypothesis in this highly innovative and clinically significant study is that protein-based APT-MRI is capable of identifying a precise high-protein tumor hotspot inside and outside Gd-enhancing regions with which to guide radiation dose escalation to high-risk active tumor and to facilitate an adaptive strategy to regions of therapeutic resistance during RT.
The innovative APT-RT technique developed by the investigators at Johns Hopkins enables a personalized RT regimen with precise dose escalation in high-risk tumor regions and response-adapted dose escalation in therapeutically resistant lesions in the boost phase, which could decrease the local recurrence rate. Personalized local therapy intensification would achieve maximal tumor control and improve the survival for GBM patients. The investigator's preliminary study will lay the foundation for a more definitive phase-II prospective clinical trial to assess the impact of APT imaging on RT guidance with regard to outcomes, including overall and progression-free survival, complications, toxicity, and quality of life. The investigators expect that APT-RT should be more effective for tumor control than the current conventional therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amide proton transfer radiotherapy (APT-RT) | Experimental | Amide proton transfer radiotherapy (APT-RT) is weighted imaging that may enhance visualization of tumor infiltration and could reduce the risk of radiation toxicity while still effectively irradiating the tumor. |
|
| Standard radiotherapy (RT) | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amide proton transfer radiotherapy | Radiation | New APT-RT regimen |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in APTw signal (Efficacy of APT-RT) | A reduction in APTw signal following treatment suggests a positive response to therapy (active tumor APTw = 3-4% vs. necrosis/no tumor APTw 1-2%). A 1% greater reduction in mean APTw signal change within the Gd-enhancing tumor region from baseline (pre-RT) to post-RT in the APT-RT arm, compared to the control arm. | From baseline to 4 weeks post completion of RT. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | Overall survival will be measured for each patient from randomization to the date of death. | Randomization up to 2 years post completion of RT. |
| Progression free survival | Progression free survival will be measured for each patient from randomization to the date of progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. The definition of progression will be based on RANO criteria. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologic confirmation of glioblastoma or grade 4 astrocytoma
Age >18
KPS at least 60
Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below:
Patients of child-bearing potential (male or female) must practice adequate contraception due to possible harmful effects of radiation therapy on an unborn child.
Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristin Redmond | Contact | 410-614-1642 | kjanson3@jhmi.edu | |
| Ryan Manuel | Contact | 410-955-4261 | rmanuel5@jhmi.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kristin Redmond | Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins University | Recruiting | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001932 | Brain Neoplasms |
| D005909 | Glioblastoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016543 | Central Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009423 | Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label randomized pilot study. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either standard RT (control) or APT-enhanced, dose-escalated adaptive RT (APT-RT), stratified by pre-RT tumor volume (small <5 mL, moderate 5-20 mL, large >20 mL).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard radiotherapy | Radiation | Standard two-phase RT |
|
|
| From randomization up to 2 years post completion of RT. |
| Toxicity and radiation as assessed by grade 3 or greater neurologic toxicity | All patients who receive any amount of RT will be evaluable for toxicity. CTCAE version 5 will be used to record grade 3 or greater neurologic toxicity. | Baseline, Treatment weeks 1 - 6, Follow-ups: 6 month, 12 month, 24 month |
| Radiation as assessed by grade 3 or greater neurologic toxicity | All patients who receive any amount of RT will be evaluable for toxicity. RTOG/EORTC acute and late radiation morbidity score will be used to record grade 3 or greater neurologic toxicity. | Baseline, Treatment weeks 1 - 6, Follow-ups: 6 month, 12 month, 24 month |
| Quality of Life as assessed by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30/Brain Cancer Module-20 (EORTCQLQ30/BN20) | EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30/Brain Cancer Module-20 (EORTCQLQ30/BN20) will be recorded for each patient. Score range 0-100. higher score, better quality of life. In case of disease progression within 2 years of cycle 1, patients will be re-tested for the final time only if previous assessment was >3 months from date of progression. | Baseline (≤21 days before starting RT), 1 month follow-up (≤10 days prior to cycle 1 of adjuvant TMZ), and every 6 months (+/- 1 month) up to 2 years from completion of RT. |
| Quality of Life as assessed by the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) | M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Module (MDASI-BT) will be recorded for each patient. Score ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition) In case of disease progression within 2 years of cycle 1, patients will be re-tested for the final time only if previous assessment was >3 months from date of progression. | Baseline (≤21 days before starting RT), 1 month follow-up (≤10 days prior to cycle 1 of adjuvant TMZ), and every 6 months (+/- 1 month) up to 2 years from completion of RT. |
| D001927 |
| Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001254 | Astrocytoma |
| D005910 | Glioma |
| D018302 | Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |