Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the effects of a dual Bifidobacterium longum probiotic formulation (dipro-O and dipro-X) on sleep quality, stress responses, and gut microbiota stability in healthy adults during short-term travel. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, the study investigates whether probiotic supplementation can enhance sleep resilience, buffer stress, and modulate microbiome and physiological responses under travel-related environmental changes.
With increasing global mobility, short-term travel has become a common aspect of modern life. However, rapid environmental transitions, including changes in time zones, diet, daily routines, and psychosocial stress, can disrupt physiological homeostasis. Among the most affected systems are sleep regulation, stress responses, and gut microbiota composition. Travel-related circadian misalignment and psychological stress are known to impair sleep quality, while dietary shifts and environmental exposure can alter gut microbial balance, potentially leading to gastrointestinal discomfort, immune dysregulation, and reduced overall well-being.
Emerging evidence highlights the central role of the gut-brain axis in mediating interactions between microbiota, stress, and sleep. Alterations in gut microbiota can influence neuroendocrine pathways, including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, as well as neurotransmitter systems involved in sleep and mood regulation. Consequently, maintaining microbiota stability during periods of acute stress, such as travel, may be critical for preserving both physiological and psychological resilience.
Probiotics have gained increasing attention as a potential strategy to support health under such conditions. Defined as live microorganisms that confer health benefits when administered in adequate amounts, probiotics, particularly strains within the Bifidobacterium genus, have been shown to modulate gut microbiota composition, enhance barrier function, regulate immune responses, and influence neuroendocrine signaling. Certain Bifidobacterium longum strains have demonstrated beneficial effects on stress reduction, sleep quality, and emotional regulation, suggesting their potential role in mitigating travel-related disturbances.
In this study, a dual-strain formulation containing Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-O and dipro-X is employed, selected for their potential synergistic effects on microbiota modulation and stress resilience. These strains are hypothesized to support gut microbial stability, regulate stress-related biomarkers such as cortisol and salivary α-amylase, and improve sleep-related outcomes through modulation of neuroendocrine and microbial pathways.
To comprehensively evaluate these effects, the study integrates clinical, physiological, and multi-omics approaches. Sleep quality is assessed using both subjective (PSQI) and objective (wearable-derived) measures, while psychological status is evaluated using validated questionnaires (DASS-42, WHO-5). Biological samples, including saliva and feces, are collected to assess stress biomarkers, immune and inflammatory markers, and gut microbiota composition and function using metagenomic sequencing.
Importantly, the study adopts a longitudinal design encompassing pre-travel, travel, and post-travel phases, allowing for the assessment of dynamic changes and recovery patterns. This approach enables evaluation of not only the immediate effects of probiotic supplementation but also its potential to enhance resilience and facilitate recovery following environmental stress.
Overall, this study aims to provide mechanistic and clinical evidence supporting the use of targeted probiotic interventions as a strategy to improve sleep quality, buffer stress responses, and maintain microbiota homeostasis during short-term travel. By integrating microbiome, physiological, and psychological data, the findings are expected to contribute to the development of personalized, mechanism-based approaches for promoting health and resilience in the context of modern travel.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Daily one sachet containing maltodextrin |
|
| Probiotic | Active Comparator | Daily one sachet containing Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-O and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-X, with a combined total dose of 5 × 10⁹colony-forming units (CFU) and maltodextrin as carrier |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Dietary Supplement | Daily one sachet containing maltodextrin |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep quality during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo as assessed via questionnaire | Changes in sleep quality from generally healthy adults during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo, via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, scale 0-3 where higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. | 10-days |
| Sleep quality during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo as assessed using wearable device monitoring. | Changes in sleep- and cardiac-related physiological parameters from generally healthy adults during short-term travel following probiotic intervention compared with placebo as assessed using the Huawei Band 10 NFC edition. | 10-days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| General well being in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using questionnaire | Differences in general well being using the World Health Organization Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), having a scale of 0-5 where higher scores indicate better well being, upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo. | 10-days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daisy Zhao, Ph.D. | Contact | 3400 8680 | daisydy.zhao@polyu.edu.hk | |
| Jie Yuan, M.Sc. | Contact | peanut.yuan@diprobio.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Kowloon | Kowloon | Hong Kong |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019936 | Probiotics |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019587 | Dietary Supplements |
| D005502 | Food |
| D000066888 | Diet, Food, and Nutrition |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Probiotic |
| Dietary Supplement |
Daily one sachet containing Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-O and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum dipro-X, with a combined total dose of 5 × 10⁹colony-forming units (CFU) and maltodextrin as carrier |
|
| Psychological well being in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using questionnaire | Differences in psychological well being using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 42 items (DASS-42), having a scale of 0-3 where higher scores indicate more severe depression, anxiety, or stress symptoms, upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo. | 10-days |
| Microbiota profiles of fecal samples in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed via metagenomics sequencing. | Differences in microbiota abundance in fecal sample of generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo. | 10-days |
| Gastrointestinal immune biomarkers in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) | Differences in concentrations of gastrointestinal immune biomarkers upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo such as calprotectin using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) | 10-days |
| Salivary stress biomarkers in generally healthy adults upon administration of probiotic or placebo as assessed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) | Differences in concentrations of salivary stress biomarkers upon administration of probiotic compared to placebo such as cortisol using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) | 10-days |
| D019602 |
| Food and Beverages |