Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cervicogenic headache (CBH) is defined as a headache caused by a disorder in the cervical spine, bones, discs, or soft tissue elements, which is also accompanied by neck pain.
Unilateral, non-reversible oculo, fronto, temporal pain, pain that increases with poor neck positioning and incorrect neck movements, and may be seen with restricted movement in the upper cervical and occiput regions.
The aim of this thesis is to compare the effectiveness of Mulligan mobilization technique and myofascial release methods used in the treatment of cervicogenic headache through a prospective clinical study.
This study is designed as a prospective, case-control, hospital-based study. Ninety patients aged 18-65 years who present to our hospital with cervicogenic headaches lasting at least 3 months will be included in the study.
Participants will be given full information about the procedure and will provide written informed consent.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration.
All participants will undergo a comprehensive medical history and a detailed physical examination.
Sociodemographic and clinical data, including age, gender, height, weight, education level, employment status, and income level, will be collected through standardized questionnaires.
A total of 90 patients diagnosed with cervicogenic headache will be randomly assigned to three groups.
Group 1 (n=30) will receive mulligan mobilization therapy three times a week for four weeks (12 sessions total) and a home exercise program.
Group 2 (n=30) will receive myofascial release therapy three times a week for four weeks (12 sessions total), in addition to a home exercise program.
Group 3 (n=30) will receive only a home exercise program three times a week for four weeks (12 sessions total).
All patients will be evaluated at three different time points: before treatment, immediately after treatment is completed, and one month after treatment.
The following assessments will be made during the evaluation process:
To determine the frequency of cervicogenic headaches, patients were given a headache diary.
Head and neck pain in the individuals included in the study was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) before and after treatment.
Participants' functional status was assessed using the headache impact test (HIT-6).
The headache disability inventory/index (HDI) was used to measure the impact of headaches on daily life.
The short form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire was used to assess the patients' quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mulligan mobilization technique | Experimental | In addition to mulligan mobilization therapy, which will be given three times a week for four weeks (12 sessions in total), a home exercise program will be provided. |
|
| Myofascial release therapy | Experimental | In addition to myofascial release therapy, which will be given three times a week for four weeks (12 sessions in total), a home exercise program will be provided. |
|
| A home workout program | Active Comparator | A home workout program will be provided three times a week for four weeks (12 sessions in total). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mulligan mobilization therapy | Other | Each patient was asked to sit comfortably, and the therapist performing the treatment stood beside them. The patient's head was free and positioned between the therapist's right forearm and body, with the therapist standing to the patient's right. The therapist then placed their right index, middle, and ring fingers on the base of the occiput and held their right little finger on the spinous process of C2. Next, gentle pressure was applied ventrally and upward (45 degrees) to the lateral edge of the left thenar process and the right little finger. The gliding motion was applied rhythmically (three times per second) ten times. The therapist continuously slid the joint and actively asked the patient to move their head towards the side where the dysfunction and pain were located. He held the SNAG technique for 10 seconds. This technique was repeated 10 times over approximately 8 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of cervicogenic headache | To determine the frequency of cervicogenic headaches, patients were given a headache diary. | Beginning, week 4, and week 8 |
| assessment of pain intensity VAS pain (0-10) | 0 no pain, 10 unbearable/maximum pain | Beginning, week 4, and week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Headache impact scale (HIT) | This scale was used to assess how much headaches affected patients' school, home, and social lives. The score range is 36-78. Higher scores indicate that headaches have a greater impact on your life. | Beginning, week 4, and week 8 |
| Headache disability inventory/indexi ( HDI ) |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Individuals aged 18-65
Having experienced neck or headache for 3 months
Meeting the diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache;
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BURCU VURAL | Contact | +905389507278 | burcuvural97@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Konya Beyhekim Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi | Recruiting | Konya | 42060 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Myofascial release therapy | Other | The procedure was performed on the upper part of the trapezius muscle and the levator scapulae muscle. The patient was in a seated position, hips higher than knees, feet slightly in front of the knees and in full contact with the ground. The therapist stood behind the patient. Myofascial release of the trapezius was performed unilaterally with a soft fist, while the patient lowered their head forward and slowly rotated, creating a tension line from the middle of the trapezius towards the acromion process. During this time, the patient was asked to turn their head to the opposite side. Then, the therapist applied resistance to the opposite side of the rotation for 10 seconds. MGT was repeated 5 times on the trapezius. The therapist applied the same unilateral contraction, but the tension line was slightly laterally towards the lower edge of the scapula. The therapist then asked the patient to tilt their head forward to increase resistance on the levator scapula for 10 seconds. |
|
| Exercise therapy | Other | All patients were given a home exercise program consisting of neck joint range of motion exercises, trapezius stretches, and isometric strengthening exercises for the neck muscles. The home exercise program was initiated with 3 sets of 10 repetitions per day. The exercises were demonstrated practically by the physician, and all patients were given a printed sheet showing how to perform the exercises. Patients were contacted by phone once a week to inquire about their adherence to the exercise program and were encouraged to follow it. Patients with exercise adherence below 75-80% were excluded from the study. |
|
This 25-item questionnaire helps assess the impact of headaches and their treatment on daily life. Patients answer the questions on the questionnaire with yes (4 points), sometimes (2 points), and no (0 points). The total score is calculated out of 0-100. The results are classified as follows: 0-14 points no/very mild disability, 15-36 points mild, 37-60 points moderate, and 61-100 points severe disability. |
| Beginning, week 4, and week 8 |
| Assessment of quality of life short form-12 | It consists of 12 questions, and the answers to these questions are used to calculate a series of subscales and an overall general health score. Subscale scores are graded on a scale of 0 to 100. As the score increases from 0 (zero) to 100 (one hundred), it means the health condition is improving. | Beginning, week 4, and week 8 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051298 | Post-Traumatic Headache |
| D019547 | Neck Pain |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051271 | Headache Disorders, Secondary |
| D020773 | Headache Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000089803 | Myofascial Release Therapy |
| D005081 | Exercise Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008405 | Massage |
| D064746 | Therapy, Soft Tissue |
| D026201 | Musculoskeletal Manipulations |
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided