Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Insomnia is a highly prevalent sleep disorder characterized by persistent difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, often accompanied by impaired daytime functioning. Chronic insomnia affects approximately 10-15% of the adult population and is associated with significant physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burden. Traditional management strategies, including cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and pharmacotherapy, have shown varying levels of effectiveness, with some patients remaining refractory to standard interventions or experiencing unwanted side effects.
Recent advances in sleep neuroscience have revealed that disturbances in endogenous brain rhythms, particularly reductions in slow-wave activity (SWA) and altered sleep spindle patterns, play a key role in the pathophysiology of insomnia. These findings have sparked interest in non-pharmacological neuromodulation approaches to restore healthy sleep architecture.
One such approach is personalized nocturnal sound frequency therapy, in which low-frequency auditory stimuli (e.g., pink noise or slow oscillation-matched tones) are delivered during sleep to entrain and enhance specific sleep-related brain oscillations. Studies in healthy individuals and patients with insomnia have demonstrated that such stimulation can augment slow-wave sleep (N3), reduce nocturnal arousals, and improve perceived sleep quality. Personalized algorithms that adapt sound delivery based on real-time EEG signals further enhance these devices' efficacy and user experience.
Despite growing evidence supporting the utility of sound-based sleep modulation, there is limited data on its application in diverse insomnia subtypes and its effect as measured by gold-standard sleep studies such as polysomnography (PSG). This study uses a pre-post PSG design to evaluate the impact of personalized sound frequency therapy on objective sleep architecture and subjective sleep outcomes in patients with insomnia. The findings may provide new insights into the therapeutic potential of acoustic brainwave modulation and support its integration into personalized insomnia care.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the effect of daily personalized sound frequency therapy on sleep architecture (N1/N2/N3 %, REM %, total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency) measured by polysomnography after 12 weeks of intervention.
Secondary Objectives:
Hypothesis There is an improvement in terms of sleep architecture, sleep quality (PSQI), insomnia severity (ISI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and daytime sleepiness (ESS) with sound frequency therapy after 12 weeks of intervention.
Study Design:
A prospective, single-arm, longitudinal pre-post interventional study. Intervention duration: 12 weeks.
Baseline and follow-up PSG (full-night polysomnography).
Study Population:
Insomnia patients/hospital staff in Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Experimental | At baseline before intervention sleep study wil be performed along with assessment of Imsomnia Severity Index Scores, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Eppeorth Sleepiness Score |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personalized Sound Therapy | Device | Participants will receive a wearable sound stimulation device for 12 weeks, programmed with personalized low-frequency auditory stimuli (e.g., pink noise or slow-wave-matched sounds). The patient will self-administer the therapy at home, for one hour in the morning (upon waking) and one hour in the evening (around 5 p.m. until just before sleep). The recommended device volume is above 30%, with a frequency range between 15 and 20,000 Hz |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison in Sleep Architexture pre and post treatment | Sleep architecture refers to the structure and pattern of sleep stages recorded during overnight polysomnography. It includes Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) stages (N1, N2, N3) and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep. Key parameters include percentages of time spent in each stage, total sleep time (TST), sleep latency, sleep efficiency, and arousal index. It is measured at percentage of total sleep. | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Imsonia Severity Index pre and post treatment | The Insomnia Severity Index is a validated self-reported questionnaire that assesses insomnia's nature, severity, and impact over the previous month. It consists of 7 items, each scored 0-4, with total scores ranging from 0-28. Higher scores indicate greater insomnia severity. An ISI score of > 15 indicates moderate insomnia. It is measured in numbers (minimum 0- maximum 28) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Faisal Abdul Hamid, MBBS (IIUM) | Contact | 0391455555 | faisal.hamid@hctm.ukm.edu.my |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Faisal Abdul Hamid, MBBS (IIUM) | National University of Malaysia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National University of Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine | Recruiting | Cheras | Kuala Lumpur | 56000 | Malaysia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23185361 | Result | Lustenberger C, Maric A, Durr R, Achermann P, Huber R. Triangular relationship between sleep spindle activity, general cognitive ability and the efficiency of declarative learning. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049561. Epub 2012 Nov 21. | |
| 20137989 | Result | Baglioni C, Spiegelhalder K, Lombardo C, Riemann D. Sleep and emotions: a focus on insomnia. Sleep Med Rev. 2010 Aug;14(4):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.007. Epub 2010 Feb 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | Mar 1, 2026 | Mar 22, 2026 | Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020447 | Parasomnias |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 12 weeks |
| Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) pre and post treatment | The PSQI is a 19-item self-report questionnaire that assesses subjective sleep quality and disturbances over the past month. It yields 7 component scores, which are summed to give a global score (0-21). A score >5 indicates poor sleep quality. It is measured in numbers (minimum 0- maximum 21) | 12 weeks |
| Comparison of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) pre and post treatment | Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) The ESS questionnaire is used to assess a patient's excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) subjectively by rating their likelihood of dozing off during eight activities. A score of > 10 indicates excessive daytime sleepiness.
| 12 weeks |
| adverse events of the therapy | Adverse events will be recorded e.g headache | 12 weeks |
| adherence of the treatment received | Defined as at least 80% compliance and participate in weekly remote check-ins for monitoring and support. | 12 weeks |
| 9358396 | Result | Perlis ML, Giles DE, Mendelson WB, Bootzin RR, Wyatt JK. Psychophysiological insomnia: the behavioural model and a neurocognitive perspective. J Sleep Res. 1997 Sep;6(3):179-88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1997.00045.x. |
| 31071719 | Result | Riemann D, Krone LB, Wulff K, Nissen C. Sleep, insomnia, and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Jan;45(1):74-89. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0411-y. Epub 2019 May 9. |
| 23583623 | Result | Ngo HV, Martinetz T, Born J, Molle M. Auditory closed-loop stimulation of the sleep slow oscillation enhances memory. Neuron. 2013 May 8;78(3):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 11. |
| 28364428 | Result | Leminen MM, Virkkala J, Saure E, Paajanen T, Zee PC, Santostasi G, Hublin C, Muller K, Porkka-Heiskanen T, Huotilainen M, Paunio T. Enhanced Memory Consolidation Via Automatic Sound Stimulation During Non-REM Sleep. Sleep. 2017 Mar 1;40(3):zsx003. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx003. |
| 27318231 | Result | Ong JL, Lo JC, Chee NI, Santostasi G, Paller KA, Zee PC, Chee MW. Effects of phase-locked acoustic stimulation during a nap on EEG spectra and declarative memory consolidation. Sleep Med. 2016 Apr;20:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Nov 27. |
| 32433768 | Result | Arnal PJ, Thorey V, Debellemaniere E, Ballard ME, Bou Hernandez A, Guillot A, Jourde H, Harris M, Guillard M, Van Beers P, Chennaoui M, Sauvet F. The Dreem Headband compared to polysomnography for electroencephalographic signal acquisition and sleep staging. Sleep. 2020 Nov 12;43(11):zsaa097. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa097. |
| 40962569 | Result | Aloulou A, Chauvineau M, Destexhe A, Leger D. Listening to the sound of your own brain waves enhances sleep quality and quantity. Sleep Med. 2025 Dec;136:106755. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106755. Epub 2025 Aug 15. |
| 39118002 | Result | Qin Z, Zhu Y, Shi DD, Chen R, Li S, Wu J. The gap between statistical and clinical significance: time to pay attention to clinical relevance in patient-reported outcome measures of insomnia. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02297-0. |
| 19689221 | Result | Yang M, Morin CM, Schaefer K, Wallenstein GV. Interpreting score differences in the Insomnia Severity Index: using health-related outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Oct;25(10):2487-94. doi: 10.1185/03007990903167415. |