Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| TABED 1-26-2295 | Other Identifier | Ethics Committee of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to compare the effects of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment of the suprascapular nerve using suprascapular notch and midpoint approaches on pain, shoulder function, and muscle strength in patients with chronic shoulder pain due to rotator cuff tendinopathy. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups. Clinical evaluations will include pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), functional assessment using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and quality of life assessment using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). In addition, shoulder range of motion will be measured goniometrically, muscle thickness of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus will be evaluated by ultrasonography, and shoulder muscle strength will be assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 24 hours, 1 month, and 3 months after the intervention. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the optimal approach for PRF treatment of the suprascapular nerve in patients with chronic shoulder pain.
Chronic shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects daily activities and quality of life. Rotator cuff tendinopathy is one of the most frequent causes of chronic shoulder pain. The suprascapular nerve plays a key role in shoulder pain transmission, and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the suprascapular nerve has emerged as an effective minimally invasive treatment option.
Different anatomical approaches have been described for suprascapular nerve interventions, including the suprascapular notch and midpoint approaches. However, there is limited evidence comparing the clinical and functional outcomes of these approaches.
The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the effects of PRF applied to the suprascapular nerve via suprascapular notch and midpoint approaches in patients with chronic shoulder pain due to rotator cuff tendinopathy. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups according to the intervention approach.
Clinical evaluations will include pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), functional evaluation using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and quality of life assessment using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). In addition, shoulder range of motion will be measured goniometrically. Muscle thickness of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus will be assessed using ultrasonography, and shoulder muscle strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer.
Assessments will be performed at baseline, 24 hours, 1 month, and 3 months following the intervention. The primary outcome of the study is the change in shoulder muscle strength, while secondary outcomes include pain, functional status, and muscle thickness.
The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the literature by identifying the optimal anatomical approach for suprascapular nerve PRF in the management of chronic shoulder pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suprascapular Notch PRF | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the suprascapular nerve using the suprascapular notch approach. |
|
| Midpoint PRF | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the suprascapular nerve using the midpoint approach between the suprascapular notch and spinoglenoid notch. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRF of the Suprascapular Nerve (Notch Approach) | Procedure | Under ultrasound guidance, a radiofrequency needle will be positioned adjacent to the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch. Sensory stimulation at 50 Hz and motor stimulation at 2 Hz will be performed to confirm appropriate needle placement. Pulsed radiofrequency will then be applied at 42°C for three cycles of 120 seconds. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Isokinetic Shoulder Abduction Peak Torque | Isokinetic peak torque of shoulder abduction will be measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (ISOMED 2000). Measurements will be performed to evaluate changes in muscle strength. | Baseline and 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity (NPRS) | Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). | Baseline, 24 hours, 1 month, and 3 months |
| Shoulder Function (SPADI) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gülberk Özok, MD | Contact | 5325034077 | gulberk.koc95@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ayşe Merve Ata, MD | Ankara City Hospital Bilkent | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ankara Bilkent City Hospital | Recruiting | Ankara | 06800 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41008275 | Background | Abd-Elsayed A, Argall TR, Henjum LJ, McKindsey DM, Perkins NA, Fiala KJ. Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Radiofrequency of Suprascapular Nerves for Managing Chronic Shoulder Pain. Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 26;15(9):915. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15090915. | |
| 38988077 | Background | Jain E, O'Connor IT, Tram JK, Varlotta CA, Fiala KJ, Asaad FS, Chitneni A, Abd-Elsayed A. Radiofrequency ablation for shoulder pain: an updated systematic review. Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Jul;13(4):963-975. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-529. Epub 2024 Jul 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups using a computerized randomization method based on age and sex. One group will receive pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the suprascapular nerve via the suprascapular notch approach, while the other group will receive the same treatment via the midpoint approach.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| PRF of the Suprascapular Nerve (Midpoint Approach) | Procedure | Under ultrasound guidance, a radiofrequency needle will be positioned adjacent to the suprascapular nerve at the midpoint between the suprascapular notch and the spinoglenoid notch. Sensory stimulation at 50 Hz and motor stimulation at 2 Hz will be performed to confirm appropriate needle placement. Pulsed radiofrequency will then be applied at 42°C for three cycles of 120 seconds. |
|
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) will be used to assess pain and functional status. SPADI is a validated questionnaire consisting of 13 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater pain and disability (worse outcome).
| Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months |
| Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus Muscle Thickness | Muscle thickness will be measured using ultrasonography to evaluate structural changes in the rotator cuff muscles. | Baseline and 3 months |
| Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) | Shoulder joint range of motion will be measured using a goniometer. | Baseline and 3 months |
| Quality of Life (SF-36) | Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. SF-36 consists of 8 domains, each scored from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health status (better outcome). | Baseline and 3 months |
| 31527162 | Background | Tran J, Peng P, Agur A. Evaluation of suprascapular nerve radiofrequency ablation protocols: 3D cadaveric needle placement study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 16:rapm-2019-100739. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100739. Online ahead of print. |