Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09I03-03-V05-00009 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Early stage grants - Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| European Union | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objective No. 1: Verify the short-term effectiveness of the Activation-Socialization Intervention Program on the experiences (emotionality, anxiety) and behavior (agitated behavior) of seniors in the experimental and control groups.
Objective No. 2: Verify the long-term effectiveness of the Activation-Socialization Intervention Program on the experience (emotionality, anxiety) and behavior (agitated behavior) of seniors in the experimental and control groups.
The main question the project seeks to answer is:
Are there significant differences in the degree of emotional experience- negative and positive emotional states-anxiety, and the occurrence of agitated behavior-aggressive, physically non-aggressive, and verbally agitated behavior-between the experimental group of older adults and the control group of older adults during the measurements (pretest measurement vs. retest measurement; pretest measurement vs. retest measurement II; retest measurement vs. retest measurement II)?
Researchers will compare the experimental group (older adults participating in the A-S IP program) with the control group (older adults not participating in the intervention) to assess the impact on emotional states, anxiety, and agitated behavior.
Participants will:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activation-socialization Interventiom Programme | Experimental | The experimental group participates in an Activation-Socialization Intervention Program for five weeks. |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | The control group does not participate in the intervention program. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activation and Socialization Intervention Program | Other | The content of the Activation and Socialization Intervention Program is designed based on the identified needs and interests of seniors. It consists of 45 activities, which are divided into three concepts. Laughter therapy (Ďuricová, 2026c) includes 13 activities, Reminiscence therapy (Ďuricová, 2026b) includes 13 activities, The intervention to stimulate cognitive abilities and social skills (Ďuricová, 2026a) consists of 19 activities. The implementation of the Program is planned for a period of five weeks, during which activities take place regularly every working day in two blocks. Each day includes two activities - one in the morning (10:00-11:00 a.m.) and one in the afternoon (1:00-2:00 p.m.). The proposed activities are incorporated into the program in a targeted manner and planned in advance according to methodological principles, with their schedule respecting the principles, which are listed in publications (Ďuricová, 2026a, 2026b, 2026c). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Scale of Emotional Habituation of Subjective Well-Being - SEHP (Džuka & Dalbert, 2002) | The Scale of Emotional Habituation of Subjective Well-Being - SEHP (Džuka & Dalbert, 2002) was used to examine the short-term effectiveness of the intervention programme. The self-esteem scale maps the frequency of experiencing positive and negative emotions, totalling 10. Negative emotional experiencing consists of six emotions such as anger, guilt, fear, pain, sadness, and shame, positive emotional experiencing consists of pleasure, physical freshness, joy, and happiness. The participants responded on a six-point scale (6 - almost always; 1 - almost never). The total score of negative emotions is the sum of negative emotions, and the total score of positive emotions is the sum of positive emotions (Džuka et al., 2021). | two months |
| The Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI (Spielberger et al., 1970, ed. Ruisel et al., 1980) | The Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI (Spielberger et al., 1970, ed. Ruisel et al., 1980), specifically only the anxiety portion of the questionnaire, i.e., the Scale for the Measurement of Anxiety as a Condition, STAI X-1. This is the self-assessment portion of the questionnaire, which maps the degree of current experience of feelings of tension, tenseness, nervousness, fear, and apprehension. It contains 20 statements, some of which relate to the existence of these feelings and some of which relate to their absence. Seniors rated their experiencing on a four-point scale (4 - very, 1 - not at all). The result is a total score, which is obtained by summing the values on the scale taking into account reverse scaling. The range of the total score is 20-80. We based the norms on those presented in the manual by Ruisel et al. (1980). | two months |
| Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory - CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield, 1991), specifically CMAI-D, long version. | Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory - CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield, 1991), specifically CMAI-D, long version. It is an assessment questionnaire, designed for institutional staff, that reflects the manifestations and frequency of agitated behaviors among older persons living in the facility. It includes 29 manifestations of behaviour, and social workers rated the behaviour of the elderly during the last 2 weeks on a seven-point scale (7 - several times per hour, 1 - never). The total score is calculated by summing all items (Sánchez, 2016). It reaches values of 29-203, based on the information that a total score (greater than) > 45 indicates significant agitation (Cohen-Mansfield & al., 1989). Cohen-Mansfield (1991) used factor analysis to develop three factors of agitated behaviour that occur in a nursing home: factor 1 - aggressive behavior; factor 2 - physically non-aggressive behavior; factor 3 - verbally agitated behavior. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reflection Questionnaire (Ďuricová, 2023) | This is a questionnaire that maps client satisfaction with activities. It includes three statements, with clients expressing their level of agreement on a three-point scale (agree - have no strong opinion - disagree) in the areas of: re participation, usefulness and disinterest in the activities. It also includes three incomplete sentences that seniors complete at will. Responses reflect what clients learned/how the activities helped them, what they liked most about the activities, what they would remove from the activities. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria for edlerly adults:
Exclusion Criteria for elderly adults:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lenka Ďuricová, doc., Mgr., PhD. | Matej Bel University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of the Higher Territorial Unit of Banská Bystrica | Banská Bystrica | 974 11 | Slovakia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Spielberger, Ch. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Stai manual for the state trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press. | ||
| Background | Ďuricová, D. (2026c). Aktivizačno-socializačný intervenčný program pre seniorov: Terapia smiechom [Activation-Socialization Intervention Program for Seniors: Laughter Therapy]. Grada. | ||
| Background | Ďuricová, D. (2026b). Aktivizačno-socializačný intervenčný program pre seniorov: Reminiscenčná terapia [Activation-Socialization Intervention Program for Seniors: Reminiscence Therapy]. Grada. | ||
| Background | Ďuricová, D. (2026a). Aktivizačno-socializačný intervenčný program pre seniorov: Intervencia na stimuláciu kognitívnych schopností a sociálnych zručností [Activation-Socialization Intervention Program for Seniors: Intervention to Stimulate Cognitive Abilities and Social Skills ]. Grada. | ||
| Background | Ďuricová, D. (2023). Vplyv Snoezelen intervencie a Reminiscenčnej terapie na emocionalitu, úzkosť a agitované správanie seniorov v zariadení [The Effect of Snoezelen Intervention and Reminiscence Therapy on Emotionality, Anxiety, and Agitated Behavior in Seniors in a Care Facility ] [Master's Thesis, Matej Bel University].CRZP. | ||
| Background | Cohen-Mansfield, J. (1991). Instruction Manual for the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). The Research Institute of the Hebrew Home of Greater Washington. |
Not provided
Not provided
The informed consent form will be shared.
The informed consent form will be shared without restriction.
Everyone will have access to the informed consent form.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D011595 | Psychomotor Agitation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D020820 | Dyskinesias |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| two months |
| six weeks |
| The Scale of Emotional Habituation of Subjective Well-Being - SEHP (Džuka & Dalbert, 2002) | The Scale of Emotional Habituation of Subjective Well-Being - SEHP (Džuka & Dalbert, 2002) was used to examine the short-term effectiveness of the intervention programme. The self-esteem scale maps the frequency of experiencing positive and negative emotions, totalling 10. Negative emotional experiencing consists of six emotions such as anger, guilt, fear, pain, sadness, and shame, positive emotional experiencing consists of pleasure, physical freshness, joy, and happiness. The participants responded on a six-point scale (6 - almost always; 1 - almost never). The total score of negative emotions is the sum of negative emotions, and the total score of positive emotions is the sum of positive emotions (Džuka et al., 2021). | six months |
| The Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI (Spielberger et al., 1970, ed. Ruisel et al., 1980) | The Anxiety and Trait Anxiety Inventory - STAI (Spielberger et al., 1970, ed. Ruisel et al., 1980), specifically only the anxiety portion of the questionnaire, i.e., the Scale for the Measurement of Anxiety as a Condition, STAI X-1. This is the self-assessment portion of the questionnaire, which maps the degree of current experience of feelings of tension, tenseness, nervousness, fear, and apprehension. It contains 20 statements, some of which relate to the existence of these feelings and some of which relate to their absence. Seniors rated their experiencing on a four-point scale (4 - very, 1 - not at all). The result is a total score, which is obtained by summing the values on the scale taking into account reverse scaling. The range of the total score is 20-80. We based the norms on those presented in the manual by Ruisel et al. (1980). | six months |
| Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory - CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield, 1991), specifically CMAI-D, long version. | Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory - CMAI (Cohen-Mansfield, 1991), specifically CMAI-D, long version. It is an assessment questionnaire, designed for institutional staff, that reflects the manifestations and frequency of agitated behaviors among older persons living in the facility. It includes 29 manifestations of behaviour, and social workers rated the behaviour of the elderly during the last 2 weeks on a seven-point scale (7 - several times per hour, 1 - never). The total score is calculated by summing all items (Sánchez, 2016). It reaches values of 29-203, based on the information that a total score (greater than) > 45 indicates significant agitation (Cohen-Mansfield & al., 1989). Cohen-Mansfield (1991) used factor analysis to develop three factors of agitated behaviour that occur in a nursing home: factor 1 - aggressive behavior; factor 2 - physically non-aggressive behavior; factor 3 - verbally agitated behavior. | six months |
| Background | Ruisel, I., Müllner, J., & Farkaš, G. (1980). Dotazník na meranie úzkosti a úzkostlivosti [Questionnaire for measuring anxiety and anxiousness]. Psychodiagnostika, spoločnosť s. r. o. |
| Background | Džuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Vývoj a overenie validity škál emocionálnej habituálnej subjektívnej pohody (SEHP) [Development and validation of the scales of emotional habitual subjective well-being]. Československá psychologie, 46(3), 234-250. |
| D011596 |
| Psychomotor Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D000096762 | Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |