Effectiveness of an AI Scribe Compared to Routine Templates for Clinical Documentation in Orthopedic Consultations: A Randomized Study
Effectiveness of an AI Scribe Compared to Routine Templates for Clinical Documentation in Orthopedic Consultations: A Randomized Study
This randomized study compares AI-generated clinical documentation with traditional dictation templates during orthopedic consultations. Patients are randomized to have their consultation documented using either an AI medical scribe or a routine dictation template. Outcomes include surgeon documentation time, administrative processing time, time from consultation to note delivery to the family physician, patient satisfaction, and documentation accuracy.
Clinical documentation is a necessary but time-consuming component of surgical practice. Traditional documentation relies on dictation templates that require manual transcription and editing by administrative staff. Artificial intelligence (AI) medical scribes have been developed to automate documentation by recording and transcribing consultations in real time.
The purpose of this randomized study is to compare the effectiveness of an AI scribe versus routine dictation templates in orthopedic consultations.
Patients undergoing consultation for total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, or meniscal pathology will be invited to participate. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either AI-generated documentation or standard dictation template documentation. Consultations will otherwise occur according to usual clinical practice.
Data collected will include:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: