Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Older patients with cancer are at increased risk of severe chemotherapy-related toxicities due to comorbidities, functional impairments, and geriatric syndromes. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA) can identify vulnerabilities and guide tailored management, but routine implementation is challenging due to time and resource constraints.
This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluates the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a patient self-report, risk-based geriatric assessment-driven management algorithm (GA-MA) compared with usual care in older patients starting chemotherapy. Participants aged 65 years or older who are initiating a new chemotherapy regimen are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GA-MA plus usual care or usual care alone.
The primary outcome is the incidence of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related toxicities within three months of treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes include emergency department visits, unplanned hospitalizations, early chemotherapy termination, and changes in frailty and performance status. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment, retention, adherence to GA-driven recommendations, and time required to complete geriatric assessment.
This is a single-center, prospective, pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a risk-based geriatric assessment-driven management algorithm (GA-MA) in older patients with cancer starting chemotherapy.
Older adults receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk of severe treatment-related toxicities due to comorbidities, functional impairments, and geriatric syndromes that are not reliably identified by standard oncology assessments. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA) can identify these vulnerabilities and guide individualized supportive care, but routine implementation is challenging in busy oncology clinics.
In this study, patients aged 65 years or older who are initiating a new chemotherapy regimen are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either usual care or usual care plus GA-MA. In the intervention arm, patients complete a baseline geriatric assessment using validated self-report tools. Results are reviewed by oncology nurses and treating oncologists, who may apply a predefined risk-based management algorithm developed with multidisciplinary input. GA-driven recommendations may include medication review, nutritional support, physiotherapy or occupational therapy referral, caregiver education, and guidance on chemotherapy dose adjustment for higher-risk patients. Intervention cases are also reviewed in regular multidisciplinary meetings.
Participants are followed for three months after chemotherapy initiation. Outcomes include the incidence of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related toxicities, emergency department visits, unplanned hospitalizations, early termination of chemotherapy, and changes in frailty and performance status. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, adherence to GA-MA recommendations, and time required to complete geriatric assessment. Results will inform the design of a future larger randomized trial and the feasibility of integrating GA-MA into routine oncology practice.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No Intervention | Participants in the usual care arm receive standard oncology care according to routine clinical practice. Treatment decisions, including chemotherapy dosing, supportive care, and referrals, are determined by the treating oncologist based on usual assessment and clinical judgment. Results of geriatric assessment and geriatric assessment-driven management recommendations are not provided to the treating team. | |
| GA-MA plus Usual Care | Experimental | Participants in the intervention arm receive usual care plus a risk-based geriatric assessment-driven management algorithm (GA-MA). Participants complete a baseline geriatric assessment using validated self-report tools. Geriatric assessment results are reviewed by oncology nurses and treating oncologists, who may apply predefined GA-driven management recommendations. Intervention cases are also reviewed in regular multidisciplinary meetings, and recommendations are communicated to the treating oncologist. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geriatric Assessment-Driven Management Algorithm (GA-MA) | Other | The GA-MA is a risk-based geriatric assessment-driven management approach designed to support individualized care for older patients starting chemotherapy. The intervention uses validated patient self-report geriatric assessment tools to identify vulnerabilities across multiple domains, including functional status, cognition, nutrition, comorbidity, medication use, and social support. Based on assessment results, predefined GA-driven recommendations may include medication review to reduce polypharmacy or drug-drug interactions, referral to physiotherapy or occupational therapy to support functional status, dietary counseling for nutritional impairment, caregiver education, and guidance on chemotherapy dose modification for patients at higher risk of treatment-related toxicity. Recommendations are structured to allow rapid review and integration into routine oncology care. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities | Incidence of grade 3 or higher chemotherapy-related toxicities, assessed and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. | From chemotherapy initiation to 3 months after initiation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Emergency Department Visits | Occurrence of emergency department visits after chemotherapy initiation, identified through review of clinical medical records. | From chemotherapy initiation to 3 months after initiation |
| Unplanned Hospitalizations |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment, Randomization, and Retention Rates | Feasibility of trial conduct assessed by rates of recruitment, randomization, and retention, including the proportion of eligible participants recruited, successfully randomized, and completing follow-up assessments. | Throughout the study period |
| Completeness of Data Collection |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wing-Lok Wendy Chan | The University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
Individual participant data will not be shared due to institutional data governance requirements and to protect participant confidentiality.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D000073496 | Frailty |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either usual care or usual care plus a risk-based geriatric assessment-driven management algorithm (GAMA) using a computer-generated block randomization scheme.
Not provided
Not provided
This study is open-label to participants and treating clinicians because the intervention involves geriatric assessment results and management recommendations that are reviewed and applied during routine care. Outcome assessors responsible for determining study endpoints, including chemotherapy-related toxicities, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and early treatment termination, are blinded to treatment allocation. Outcomes are ascertained through independent review of clinical records and graded using standardized criteria without knowledge of group assignment.
|
Occurrence of unplanned hospitalizations after chemotherapy initiation, identified through review of clinical medical records.
| From chemotherapy initiation to 3 months after initiation |
| Early Termination of Chemotherapy | Early termination of chemotherapy due to treatment-related toxicities, defined as discontinuation of chemotherapy before completion of the planned treatment course. | From chemotherapy initiation to 3 months after initiation |
| Change in Frailty Status | Change in frailty status measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), a clinician-rated global measure of frailty developed by Rockwood and colleagues. The CFS is a 9-point scale that summarizes an older adult's overall level of fitness and frailty based on clinical judgment, considering functional ability, comorbidities, and cognitive status. Scores range from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill), with higher scores indicating greater frailty. | Baseline to 3 months after chemotherapy initiation |
| Change in Performance Status (ECOG Performance Status) | Change in functional status measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status scale, a clinician-rated measure ranging from 0 (fully active) to 4 (completely disabled), with lower scores indicating better functional status. | Baseline to 3 months after chemotherapy initiation |
Extent of missing data for study outcome measures, assessed by the proportion of participants with complete baseline and follow-up data. |
| Baseline to 3 months after chemotherapy initiation |
| Adherence to GA-MA Recommendations | Percentage of participants in the intervention group who follow the GA-MA recommendations provided to them. | From baseline assessment to 3-month follow-up. |
| Feasibility of Geriatric Assessment Administration | Feasibility of administering geriatric assessment assessed by the time required to complete baseline geriatric assessment, time required to explain assessment results in the intervention group, and the proportion of participants requiring research assistant assistance to complete self-report questionnaires. | At baseline and during intervention delivery |