Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/C06-i03.03/2021.PID-15 | Other Grant/Funding Number | InnovHealth Scholarships, funded by the Impulso Jovens STEAM Programme within the Resilient P.PORTO Programme | |
| UID/05210/2025 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Center for Rehabilitation Research - Polytechnic Institute of Porto (IPP) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to validate a personalized physical activity algorithm for risk screening and individualized exercise prescription using a modified online Delphi process. International experts in physical activity and exercise will evaluate the algorithm's components over two rounds of questionnaires, with consensus defined as ≥70% agreement. If needed, a focus group will resolve any remaining disagreements. Validation of this algorithm may support safer, more effective autonomous exercise, promoting adherence, improved health outcomes, and population-level benefits.
Study Phases - eDelphi Validation of the APPA Algorithm
Phase 1 - Round 1 (Initial Online Questionnaire):
The first phase consists of an online survey in which international experts in physical activity and exercise will evaluate the components of the personalized physical activity algorithm for health risk screening and individualized exercise prescription. Experts will assess the relevance, clarity, and clinical appropriateness of each item. Feedback from this round will identify items requiring modification or clarification.
Phase 2 - Round 2 (Re-evaluation):
The second phase consists of a consecutive online survey round, in which experts will re-evaluate the revised algorithm components based on feedback from Round 1. Experts will have the opportunity to adjust their ratings. This phase aims to move items closer to consensus (≥70% agreement).
Phase 3 - Optional Focus Group (if needed):
If consensus is not reached on specific items after Round 2, an online focus group will be conducted to discuss and resolve remaining disagreements. This discussion will help refine the algorithm and ensure agreement on all components.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expert Panel | Cohort of experts in physical activity and exercise with recognized scientific or professional experience and a relevant doctoral degree. Experts will validate a digital algorithm for health risk screening and individualized physical activity prescription via a modified online Delphi process. Two rounds of anonymous questionnaires will assess the relevance, clarity, and clinical appropriateness of algorithm components. If consensus (≥70% agreement) is not reached, a follow-up online focus group will resolve disagreements. Recruitment will be through institutional emails and professional networks. Participation is voluntary, with informed consent obtained. Panel size: 9-18 experts, consistent with Delphi methodology to ensure representativeness and robustness. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expert consensus on algorithm components | Consensus defined as ≥70% agreement among experts using a 9-point Likert scale in a two-round modified Delphi process evaluating the relevance and clarity of algorithm items. | Up to 2 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will consist of international experts in the field of Physical Activity and Exercise. Participants will be identified based on their recognized scientific or professional experience and possession of a relevant doctoral degree. Recruitment will be primarily via institutional email invitations, supplemented by personal contacts when needed. Eligible experts will voluntarily participate in two rounds of an online modified Delphi questionnaire and, if required, an online focus group to resolve any remaining disagreements. The targeted panel size is 9 - 18 experts to ensure representativeness and methodological robustness.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria P Gomes, Masters student | Contact | +351 222 061 000 | mapg@ess.ipp.pt |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andreia SP Sousa | Center for Rehabilitation Research | Study Director |
| António M Montes | Center for Rehabilitation Research | Study Director |
| Anabela C Martins |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| School of Health - Polytechnic Institute of Porto | Recruiting | Porto | 4200-072 | Portugal |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| H&TR-Health & Technology Research Center, Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra |
| Study Director |