Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this prospective, non-randomized pilot study is to learn whether predictions from a previously validated 12-lead ECG-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm (ECG-AI) identify people more likely to have undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do people predicted to have high risk of AF using ECG-AI have a higher rate of new AF diagnosis using 1L ECG screening compared with people predicted to have a low risk? Do AI-based AF risk estimates from the 12-lead ECG correlate with AF risk estimates from the 1L ECG? Do people find 1L ECG screening for AF acceptable and useful?
Participants will:
Undergo screening with 1L ECG mailed to their home Complete a survey assessing attitudes toward 1L ECG screening Complete a 14-day patch monitor on 1 or 2 occasions depending on 1L ECG results
This is a prospective, non-randomized pilot study designed to assess whether our 12-lead ECG algorithm can identify individuals with AF detectable using 1L ECG. We will also assess whether AF risk estimates from the 1L ECG correlate with those using the 12-lead ECG. We also plan to assess participant attitudes toward the use of 1L ECGs for AF risk estimation.
Using our AF risk algorithm on existing 12-lead ECGs, will categorize prospective participants into low AF risk (<1% 1-year AF risk) versus high AF risk (>10% 1-year AF risk). We will mail 1L ECG devices to participants and ask them to obtain 3 tracings which we will then use to estimate AF risk using a 1L ECG version of our AF risk algorithm. We will then screen perform patch monitor screening for AF and compare the rates of AF detection between the two groups.
This study involves use of two consumer digital devices. The AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L ECG device is an FDA cleared cardiac rhythm assessment device capable of producing a 1L ECG in conjunction with a compatible smartphone. The Zio®XT is an FDA cleared medical-grade 1L ECG rhythm monitor.
This pilot study has three main outcomes: 1) prospectively ascertained estimated AF risk using the handheld 1L ECG algorithm, 2) incident AF at 12 months, ascertained using the linked EHR and/or the results of the study patch monitors, and 3) perceived acceptability and usefulness of the handheld ECG. No physical study visits are required according to this protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-risk | Active Comparator | Low estimated risk for AF (<1% 1-year AF risk) |
|
| High-risk | Active Comparator | Low estimated risk for AF (>10% 1-year AF risk) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1L ECG screening | Diagnostic Test | Individuals will undergo 1L ECG screening using the AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L ECG device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| New AF diagnosis (%) | Rate of new AF diagnosis | 1 year |
| Acceptability and usefulness | Survey-based acceptability and usefulness of 1L ECG screening process | 0 |
| AI-based AF risk correlation | Correlation between 12-lead ECG-based AF risk and 1L ECG-based AF risk using AI model | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass General Brigham | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41299008 | Background | Khurshid S, Friedman SF, Al-Alusi MA, Kany S, Sommers T, Anderson CD, Ho JE, McManus DD, Borowsky LH, Ashburner JM, Lubitz SA, Atlas SJ, Maddah M, Singer DE, Ellinor PT. Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Nov 26;8(1):776. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02164-2. | |
| 34743566 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
High-risk versus low-risk comparison
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Patch monitor | Diagnostic Test | Individuals who are found to have evidence of AF on 1L ECG will undergo assessment with 14-day patch monitor at the time of initial screen. Otherwise all study participants will undergo 14-day patch monitor at the 1-year timepoint. |
|
| Background |
| Khurshid S, Friedman S, Reeder C, Di Achille P, Diamant N, Singh P, Harrington LX, Wang X, Al-Alusi MA, Sarma G, Foulkes AS, Ellinor PT, Anderson CD, Ho JE, Philippakis AA, Batra P, Lubitz SA. ECG-Based Deep Learning and Clinical Risk Factors to Predict Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2022 Jan 11;145(2):122-133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057480. Epub 2021 Nov 8. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |