suPAR Michigan M2C2 Heterogeneity Validation Cohort Study

suPAR ≥6 ng/mL for Predicting Severe Respiratory Failure in U.S. Adults Hospitalized With COVID 19 (suPAR US The Michigan Cohort Heterogeneity Study)

This is a retrospective, non interventional cohort study using stored plasma samples from appoximately 300 adults hospitalized with confirmed COVID 19. Baseline suPAR measured using the suPARnostic TurbiLatex assay on the Roche cobas c501.

The Michigan Medicine COVID-19 Cohort (M2C2) is the largest sub-cohort of the International Study on Inflammation in COVID-19 (ISIC). The M2C2 comprises consecutive, systematically enrolled adults (≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized specifically for COVID-19 at the University of Michigan from 1 February 2020 to 1 June 2021. Adult patients hospitalized in participating U.S. hospitals with confirmed COVID 19 infection during the study period, who had baseline suPAR measured using the suPARnostic TurbiLatex assay on Roche cobas c501 on plasma samples obtained within 48 hours of admission. The cohort reflects real world U.S. data and includes racially and ethnically diverse populations with typical U.S. burdens of obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease.

SAMPLE SIZE JUSTIFICATION - Since we have a fixed 6 ng/mL threshold and are only validating (not discovering), the analysis is just a 2×2 table.

True sensitivity 94% (matching SPARCOL): N=136 is enough True sensitivity 90% (conservative): N=237 is enough True sensitivity 88% (worst case): N=440 needed SPARCOL showed 93.9%, so N=300 covers you even if U.S. sensitivity drops to ~88% - a generous safety margin.

STATED LIMITATIONS

• N=300 does not support fully adjusted multivariable logistic regression
• Hispanic and Asian subgroups are too small for standalone powered analyses. These subgroups are reported descriptively.
• Formal non-inferiority testing of sensitivity (U.S. vs. SPARCOL) would require a larger sample. The comparison is performed descriptively, with the acceptance criterion applied to the U.S. data independently (lower 95% CI > 80%).

CONCLUSION We have previously considered measuring 1200 samples, but a balance between statistical rigor and practical feasibility (assay cost, data extraction effort) we recalculated number needed to N=300 which according to the power calculation is an appropriate sample size for this validation study.

REFERENCES

1. Hayek SS, Vasb inder A, Engoren M, et al. J Med Virol. 2024; 96(1):e29389. PMID: 38235904.
2. Chalkias A, Skoulakis A, Papagiannakis N, et al. Eur J Clin Invest. 022;52(7):e13794. PMID: 35435245.
3. Altintas I, Eugen-Olsen J, Seppala S, et al. Biomark Insights. 2021;16. PMID: 34421295.
4. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(12):1373-1379.
5. FDA Q-Sub Q240207/A001 Meeting Minutes, April 15, 2024.
6. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36.

• Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years at hospital admission.
  2. Confirmed SARS CoV 2 infection documented in the EHR (positive RT PCR or antigen test from a respiratory specimen).
  3. suPAR level measured from EDTA plasma using the suPARnostic TurbiLatex assay on a Roche cobas c501 analyzer on samples taken within 24 hours of Emergency Department presentation or hospital admission.
  4. Available 30 day follow up data from the date of admission (30 day vital status and SRF status ascertainable).

• Exclusion Criteria

  1. Already intubated and/or receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of suPAR sample collection.
  2. Documented "Do Not Intubate" order or determination that the patient was not a candidate for mechanical ventilation at admission.
  3. suPAR measured by a method other than the suPARnostic TurbiLatex assay on Roche cobas c501 (e.g., ELISA, other platforms).
  4. Incomplete primary endpoint data (SRF status cannot be determined within 30 days).
  5. Patients with confirmed SARS CoV 2 infection who were not primarily admitted for COVID 19 (incidental positive test in a non COVID admission).