Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscopy is commonly used to sample lymph nodes in patients with suspected or known lung cancer to determine the stage of the disease. Accurate staging is essential as it directly impacts treatment decisions and prognosis. During EBUS procedures, needles are often reused across multiple lymph node stations and are typically flushed with saline between samples. This raises the concern that residual tumor cells may contaminate the samples and could potentially incorrectly upstage disease.
This prospective study will evaluate the current technique used during EBUS procedures to determine if more intensive cleaning leads to reduced cellular contamination without affecting diagnostics. Patients undergoing an EBUS procedure for diagnosis with a large mass and a high probability of malignancy will be selected for the study. Rapid On-Site Examination (ROSE) will be used at the bedside to determine the presence of abnormal cells. Following the final pass, before moving to the next station, the needle will be flushed with saline as normal and then flushed again into another container to evaluate the presence of residual cells. The outcome may help EBUS needle handling practices and improve lung cancer staging accuracy.
No additional invasive procedures are performed as part of this study; all analyses utilize material obtained during routine EBUS needle flushing, with no added needle sticks or alteration of clinical care.
EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a cornerstone in lung cancer staging. Accurate nodal staging under the TNM 9th edition guidelines is essential. Prior work has demonstrated that EBUS needle contamination can occur. A prospective multicenter study published in Archivos de Bronconeumologia demonstrates residual malignant cells despite repeated saline flushes with increasing flush volumes. A prospective observational study by Berim et al. showed malignant and non-malignant cellular debris can persist after multiple cleaning steps. Repeated flushing reduced but did not eliminate the contaminants, suggesting the current practice of flushing with saline may be insufficient to prevent contamination. The above studies demonstrate that contamination does exist in EBUS needle aspiration though there is no universal consensus on how to address contamination risk. The proposed project would identify cytologic contamination present in our current practices, without any additional risk from a procedural standpoint to the patient. This project would also examine the presence of malignant cells despite additional flushing.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purge cleaning | Experimental | Additional flushing of the needle into a separate vial. |
|
| Standard practice | No Intervention | Standard saline flush following lesion sampling |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purge cleaning | Diagnostic Test | Additional flushing of the needle into a separate vial |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cytologic Contamination | To determine the presence of cytologic contamination following standard practice cleaning techniques | From enrollment to the date of the pathological review report of the specimen taken during diagnostic EBUS sampling for a period of up to 32 weeks post enrollment and randomization in trial for each patient enrolled. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Pathological Upstaging | To evaluate the incidence of pathological upstaging based on our primary outcome findings | From enrollment to the date of the pathological review report of the specimen taken during diagnostic EBUS sampling for a period of up to 32 weeks post enrollment and randomization in trial for each patient enrolled. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanglin Guo, MD | Contact | 601-984-5650 | yguo@umc.edu | |
| Ricardo Ungo, MD | Contact | 601-984-5660 | rungo@umc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yanglin Guo, MD | University of Mississippi Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Mississippi Medical Center | Jackson | Mississippi | 39216 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Berim IG, Colanta A, Saeed AI, et al. Contamination of Needles Used for Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Biopsies: Myth Confirmed. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2017;195:A2868 | ||
| 35312544 | Background | Tirapu Puyal JM, Mugica Atorrasagasti N, Leal Arranz MV, Santana Astudillo JC, Lopez Duque JC, Ortega Comunian L, Rezola Bajineta M, Segues Merino N. Cytologic Contamination of the Sampling Needle in Endobronchial Ultrasound. Arch Bronconeumol. 2022 Apr;58(4):367-368. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 24. No abstract available. English, Spanish. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data, such as age and gender, that are utilized in results for publication will be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective study conducted in patients undergoing an EBUS procedure for lung cancer diagnosis. Selected patients will undergo a two-step process following the final pass of a station verified to have abnormal cells by ROSE. The EBUS needle will undergo cleaning as follows:
Samples will then be sent to pathology as normal for evaluation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Effectiveness of Additional Flushing | To establish whether enhanced flushing protocols are required to mitigate the risk of contamination as evidenced by a change in incidences of cytologic contamination as reported by pathologic assessment of specimens taken after enhanced cleaning techniques. | From enrollment to the date of the pathological review report of the specimen taken during diagnostic EBUS sampling for a period of up to 32 weeks post enrollment and randomization in trial for each patient enrolled. |
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |