Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Southern Medical University, China | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This Guangzhou-based project uses a randomized controlled trial to test home environment modifications (e.g., anti-slip mats, lighting) for preventing falls among 320 community-dwelling elders. Over 12 months, it assesses effectiveness, cost-efficiency, and scalability, with rigorous quality control and multi-level stakeholder collaboration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Environment Assessment and Modification | Experimental | Participants randomized to this arm receive a multi-component intervention. A trained community health worker conducts a one-time, comprehensive in-home assessment of fall hazards using a standardized checklist. Based on the assessment, the participant receives personalized, face-to-face advice for environmental modifications and is provided with, and instructed on the use of, essential safety aids including non-slip mats, night lights, anti-fall warning signs, and double-sided tape (for securing rugs). This core intervention is delivered once, 4-6 weeks after the baseline survey. All participants (in both arms) are followed up monthly for 12 months to collect data on falls. |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Participants randomized to this arm do not receive the home environment assessment, modification advice, or any safety aids. They continue with their usual activities. To ensure balanced data collection, they undergo identical baseline and outcome assessments (at 6 and 12 months) as the intervention group, and their falls are similarly tracked via monthly fall calendars for the 12-month study period. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Environment Assessment and Modification | Behavioral | Participants randomized to this arm receive a multi-component intervention. A trained community health worker conducts a one-time, comprehensive in-home assessment of fall hazards using a standardized checklist. Based on the assessment, the participant receives personalized, face-to-face advice for environmental modifications and is provided with, and instructed on the use of, essential safety aids including non-slip mats, night lights, anti-fall warning signs, and double-sided tape (for securing rugs). This core intervention is delivered once, 4-6 weeks after the baseline survey. All participants (in both arms) are followed up monthly for 12 months to collect data on falls. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The rate of falling in each group | Falls will be monitored with supplied monthly fall diaries. | Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month] |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) regarding Fall Prevention | Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) regarding fall using a self-administered questionnaire. Regarding the questionnaire measurement section, we would like to clarify that the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) survey in our study was scored and assessed as a holistic construct or a composite measure. The overall KAP score was used for primary reporting and statistical analysis, rather than treating Knowledge (K), Attitude (A), and Practices (P) as three independent, separately analyzed dimensions or subscales. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run Doctor wang, Phd | Contact | +8619865182576 | runwang@i.smu.edu.cn |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhoucenter Fordisease Control and Prevention(Guangzhou Health Supervision Institute) | Recruiting | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510900 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 19, 2026 | Mar 19, 2026 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Title: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Environment Assessment and Modification for Fall Prevention among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Guangzhou, China
Study Design A two-arm, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 12-month follow-up period.
Primary Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a home environment assessment and modification intervention in reducing the incidence of falls among community-dwelling older adults, compared to a no-intervention control.
Participants and Setting Target Population: 320 community-dwelling adults aged 60-80 years. Setting: 8 Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Huadu District, Guangzhou. Inclusion Criteria: Able to walk 50 meters unaided, planning to reside in the current address for the next 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria: Acute illness, unwilling to complete the 12-month follow-up.
Intervention Intervention Group: Receives a one-time, comprehensive home environment fall hazard
Not provided
Not provided
Certainly. Here is a concise English summary of the blinding procedures described in the study protocol.
This study employed a single-blind design. Due to the pragmatic nature of the intervention, which involved home environment assessments and the provision of physical aids, it was not feasible to blind the participating older adults or the personnel delivering the intervention. However, to minimize assessment bias, outcome assessors responsible for collecting follow-up data (e.g., fall incidents, questionnaire responses) and data analysts were blinded to the group allocation (intervention or control) throughout the trial.
|
| Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month |
| Fall efficacy in each group | Fall efficacy will be monitored with 'Falls Efficacy Scale International, FES-I', and each item is scored on a scale of 1 to 4 (from "not at all confident" to "very confident"), with a total score of 16 to 64, with higher scores indicating a greater sense of fall efficacy or self-confidence. | Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month |
| Quality of life in each group | Quality of life will be monitored with 'the 12-item MOS Short-form Health Survey version 2, SF-12 V.2'. All entries except 1, 8, 9 and 10 are positively scored and the total score is calculated by the scale's unique standardised method, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100 | Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month |
| Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test | Description: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test is a simple, performance-based assessment of functional mobility, dynamic balance, and fall risk. It measures the time (in seconds) a person takes to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters at a comfortable and safe pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. Key Metrics: Score Range: The result is a continuous time measurement in seconds. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score, as it is a timed test. Interpretation: A higher score (longer time) indicates worse performance-specifically, greater mobility impairment, higher fall risk, and reduced functional independence. Common Clinical Cut-off: While not a strict maximum, a time of ≥10 seconds for community-dwelling older adults is often used as a clinical indicator of potential mobility limitations and increased fall risk. Times significantly above 10-12 seconds suggest higher impairment. | Time Frame: Baseline, 6-month, 12-month |