Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Critical Care Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool Made Easy (CALCULATE) into Turkish and to evaluate its validity and reliability for use in ICU patients.
This study sought to answer the following questions:
Is the Turkish version of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale a valid instrument for determining the risk of pressure injury in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)?
Is the Turkish version of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale a reliable instrument for determining the risk of pressure injury in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)?
Pressure injuries (PIs) are largely preventable adverse events that reduce patients' quality of life and create a substantial financial burden on healthcare systems. A PI is a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical device, caused by pressure and/or shear forces.
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are among the most vulnerable groups because they are exposed to multiple risk factors, including immobility, sedation, mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability, and medical devices. As a result, the risk of developing PIs in the ICU is reported to be about four times higher than in other patient groups, and most cases occur between 5 and 25 days of hospitalization.
International evidence shows that PI prevalence and incidence are higher in ICUs than in general wards. PIs, especially advanced-stage injuries, are also associated with significantly increased treatment costs. In Türkiye, although rates vary across institutions, PI occurrence in ICUs remains clinically significant, and medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) constitute a considerable proportion of cases.
Preventing hospital-acquired PIs is widely accepted as an important indicator of healthcare quality and remains a major clinical priority. The 2025 EPUAP guideline emphasizes that risk assessment should be considered not only as a screening step but as a comprehensive clinical decision-making process that guides individualized preventive care plans. Although more than 40 instruments have been developed to assess PI risk, tools designed for general patient populations may not adequately reflect the unique risk profile of critically ill ICU patients.
Based on this rationale, a validity and reliability study of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale, which was developed in the United Kingdom, was conducted in Türkiye.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICU Patients | Population consisted of patients admitted to a Level III Anesthesiology and Reanimation ICU |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICU pressure injury prevention protocol as standard care | Other | Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until discharge. During the follow-up period, pressure injury risk was assessed only through the CALCULATE and Braden scales; no additional intervention was applied as part of the study. Throughout hospitalization, all patients received the unit's routine ICU pressure injury prevention protocol as standard care. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Validity of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale | Validity of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for assessing pressure injury risk in ICU patients, evaluated using daily risk assessments during ICU stay and comparison with the Braden Scale. The Braden Scale used in clinical settings and generates a total score ranging from 6 to 23, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of PI development. According to the CALCULATE for Pressure Injury risk assessment total score, patients with ≥4 risk factors are categorized as "very high risk," whereas those with ≤3 risk factors are classified as "high risk" | From ICU admission until ICU discharge, with daily risk assessments performed once every 24 hours during ICU stay. |
| Reliability of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale | Reliability of the CALCULATE Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for assessing pressure injury risk in ICU patients, evaluated using daily risk assessments during ICU stay and comparison with the Braden Scale. The Braden Scale used in clinical settings and generates a total score ranging from 6 to 23, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of PI development. According to the CALCULATE for Pressure Injury risk assessment total score, patients with ≥4 risk factors are categorized as "very high risk," whereas those with ≤3 risk factors are classified as "high risk" . | From ICU admission until ICU discharge, with daily risk assessments performed once every 24 hours during ICU stay. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study participants were recruited from the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit of a training and research hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. Participants were enrolled from patients receiving routine care in this ICU.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences | Istanbul | Ataşehir | 34758 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37467407 | Result | Baykara ZG, Karadag A, Bulut H, Duluklu B, Karabulut H, Aktas D, Celik SS, Guler S, Ay A, Gul S, Ozturk D, Irmak B, Aydogan S, Cebeci F, Karakaya D, Avsar P. Pressure Injury Prevalence and Risk Factors: A National Multicenter Analytical Study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2023 Jul-Aug 01;50(4):289-295. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000995. | |
| 41332352 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003668 | Pressure Ulcer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059039 | Standard of Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019984 | Quality Indicators, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Hyun JE, Park SK. Characteristics of and Risk Factors for Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries in Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. West J Nurs Res. 2026 Feb;48(2):131-141. doi: 10.1177/01939459251389331. Epub 2025 Dec 3. |
| 25787920 | Result | Richardson A, Barrow I. Part 1: Pressure ulcer assessment - the development of Critical Care Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool made Easy (CALCULATE). Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Nov;20(6):308-14. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12173. Epub 2015 Mar 19. |
| 25787803 | Result | Richardson A, Straughan C. Part 2: pressure ulcer assessment: implementation and revision of CALCULATE. Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Nov;20(6):315-21. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12172. Epub 2015 Mar 19. |