Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study, called Care4Kids, aims to improve the management of respiratory infections in children visiting emergency departments. The research will evaluate the impact of using the BIOFIRE® SPOTFIRE® R/ST Panel, a rapid molecular point-of-care test, compared to standard care.
Children aged 2 months to 18 years with symptoms of respiratory tract infection or flu-like illness will be enrolled. After consent, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
The goal is to see whether rapid testing improves patient outcomes, reduces unnecessary treatments, and increases caregiver satisfaction.
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study, aims to evaluate the impact of implementing the BIOFIRE® SPOTFIRE® R/ST Panel molecular point-of-care test in pediatric Emergency Departments (EDs) on overall patient management.
The study, titled Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Events for Kids: Integrating Diagnostics and Stewardship (Care4Kids), will assess whether rapid molecular testing can improve clinical decision-making and optimize antimicrobial stewardship in children presenting with respiratory tract infections (RTIs) or influenza-like illness (ILI).
The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of SPOTFIRE® testing performed as per standard procedure in the intervention arm compared to usual care in the control arm. Patients in the control group will be managed according to standard procedures without SPOTFIRE® testing. A follow-up call will be conducted at Day 14 to collect outcome data.
The primary endpoint will be assessed using the Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) approach, which integrates multiple dimensions of patient outcomes, including clinical improvement, avoidance of unnecessary interventions, and safety.
Secondary objectives include independent evaluation of each DOOR component and assessment of patient/caregiver satisfaction with the diagnostic process and overall care.
The study will enroll pediatric patients aged between 60 days and 18 years who present with signs and/or symptoms of RTI or ILI and are able to provide a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). Immunocompromised patients will be excluded.
Eligible participants who provide informed consent will be randomized into either the intervention group or the control group.
In the intervention group, SPOTFIRE® testing will be performed as a frontline diagnostic tool, and results will be available prior to any additional procedures or prescriptions.
In the control group, patients will receive standard care without SPOTFIRE® testing.
The study will be conducted across three EDs in Europ. Recruitment will begin in March 2026 and is expected to conclude in September 2026. A total of up to 680 patients will be included, with an allowance for approximately 10% loss to follow-up, resulting in a maximum sample size of 720 participants.
This study is designed to provide robust evidence on the clinical utility of rapid molecular diagnostics in pediatric emergency settings and their potential role in improving patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control arm | No Intervention | Standard of care | |
| Intervention arm | Experimental | SPOTFIRE R will be used as a frontline test and results obtained prior to any additional procedure and/or prescription performed as per standard procedure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPOTFIRE R | Diagnostic Test | SPOTFIRE R will be used as a frontline test and results obtained prior to any additional procedure and/or prescription performed as per standard procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the overall clinical outcome of pediatric patients who come to the ED using a DOOR approach. | The DOOR approch is a composite endpoint created using outcomes from D0 (baseline, ED first visit of the patient) and D14 (+/- 2 days) (follow-up, done through a phone call). Patients will be ranked from most to least desirable outcome according to the following predefined criteria:
| From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The prescription of antimicrobial therapy initiated at D0, including both antiviral and antibiotics. Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using logistic regression or Poisson regression depending on data distribution. The type of antimicrobial therapy (antiviral and antibiotics), the class of antibiotics (betalactam, cephalosporins etc.), and duration of antibiotic and/or antiviral therapy will be summarized descriptively overall and separately. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solenne Robert, MS | Contact | +33684478785 | solenne.robert@biomerieux.com | |
| Eline Malluile, Pharm D | Contact | +33624581164 | eline.malluile@biomerieux.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hopital Robert Debré | Paris | 75019 | France | |||
| Ippokratio - General Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38436951 | Background | Schober T, Wong K, DeLisle G, Caya C, Brendish NJ, Clark TW, Dendukuri N, Doan Q, Fontela PS, Gore GC, Li P, McGeer AJ, Noel KC, Robinson JL, Suarthana E, Papenburg J. Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):528-536. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037. | |
| 37179006 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The time of antibiotic and/or antiviral therapy will be collected for each patient. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The type of antibiotic and/or antiviral therapy will be collected for each patient. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The route of antibiotic and/or antiviral therapy will be collected for each patient. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The duration of antibiotic and/or antiviral therapy will be collected for each patient. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The proportion of patients undergoing chest X-rays at D0 Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using logistic regression. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The rate of hospital admission at D0 and/or during the period of D0 to D14 if related to the index encounter Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using logistic regression. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The frequency of additional consultations for the same encounter with 14 days, assessed during the phone call. Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using logistic regression or Poisson regression depending on data distribution. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Component of the DOOR ranking | The frequency of additional visits for the same encounter with 14 days, assessed during the phone call. Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using logistic regression or Poisson regression depending on data distribution. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Number and type of diagnostic procedures performed | The number of diagnostic procedures performed, including blood tests, point-of-care Ag or molecular testing, laboratory testing (including Ag testing, molecular multiplex or single-plex) Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using Poisson regression. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Number and type of diagnostic procedures performed | The type of diagnostic procedures performed, including blood tests, point-of-care Ag or molecular testing, laboratory testing (including Ag testing, molecular multiplex or single-plex) Each of the DOOR components will be compared between the intervention and control group using Wilcoxon rank sum test. This DOOR component will also be analyzed using Poisson regression. | From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Patient satisfaction | The patient satisfaction will be assess with a survey given to the patient's parent at the ED. The survey compile 21 questions regarding : the Reception and Initial Care, Quality of medical care, Examinations performed, Communication and coordination, Overall impression and suggestions. Patient overall satisfaction score will be compared between the intervention and control group. No maetrics are plan, this is an exploratory outcomes. The Survey is adapted from:
| From enrolment until the follow-up evaluation on day 14 |
| Thessaloniki |
| Greece |
| Södersjukhuset Hospital | Stockholm | Sweden |
| Ong SWX, Petersiel N, Loewenthal MR, Daneman N, Tong SYC, Davis JS. Unlocking the DOOR-how to design, apply, analyse, and interpret desirability of outcome ranking endpoints in infectious diseases clinical trials. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Aug;29(8):1024-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 12. |
| 40512968 | Background | Ong SWX, Mahar RK, Selman CJ, Pinto R, Davis JS, Fowler RA, Tong SYC, Daneman N. Making Sense of Hierarchical Composite End Points in Randomized Clinical Trials-A Primer for Infectious Diseases Clinicians and Researchers. Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Dec 24;81(5):e319-e329. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf314. |
| 497341 | Background | O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979 Sep;35(3):549-56. |
| 29719423 | Background | Kaushik N, Khangulov VS, O'Hara M, Arnaout R. Reduction in laboratory turnaround time decreases emergency room length of stay. Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Apr 20;10:37-45. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S155988. eCollection 2018. |
| 37313374 | Background | Ciolino JD, Kaizer AM, Bonner LB. Guidance on interim analysis methods in clinical trials. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 15;7(1):e124. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.552. eCollection 2023. |
| 36139971 | Background | Brigadoi G, Gastaldi A, Moi M, Barbieri E, Rossin S, Biffi A, Cantarutti A, Giaquinto C, Da Dalt L, Dona D. Point-of-Care and Rapid Tests for the Etiological Diagnosis of Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 3;11(9):1192. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091192. |
| 31102924 | Background | Babady NE, Dunn JJ, Madej R. CLIA-waived molecular influenza testing in the emergency department and outpatient settings. J Clin Virol. 2019 Jul;116:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 10. |
| 32925706 | Background | Almeida HS, Sousa M, Mascarenhas I, Russo A, Barrento M, Mendes M, Nogueira P, Trigo R. The Dynamics of Patient Visits to a Public Hospital Pediatric Emergency Department: A Time-Series Model. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Jan 1;38(1):e240-e245. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002235. |