Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The overall purpose of ART trial is to establish the Safety and Efficacy of the J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Grade≥3+ Native Aortic Regurgitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) | Experimental | Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system |
|
| Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR) | Other | Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)using commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system | Device | Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality at 12 months | 12 months |
| All stroke | Number of patients with stroke | 12 months |
| Unplanned cardiac rehospitalization | Number of patients who had unplanned cardiac rehospitalization | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| New-onset atrial fibrillation | Comparing the onset of atrial fibrillation in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Echocardiographic effective orifice area | Comparing echocardiographic effective orifice area in TAVR with SAVR |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bleeding complications (life-threatening, disabling, or major) | Comparing bleeding complications in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months and 1 year |
| Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) |
Inclusion Criteria:
1) Age ≥65 years;
2) a. Symptomatic patients with severe AR b. Asymptomatic patients with severe AR and evidence of LV function impairment (per current ESC / ACC guidelines) Any of the following perimeters
3) Evaluated by a multi-disciplinary heart team to be suitable for both surgery and transcatheter valve replacement
4) Informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, has provided written informed consent, and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Confirmed moderate or less AR severity (Grade≤2+) by core laboratory evaluation
2. Moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis
3. Mixed with clinical relevant severe mitral or tricuspid disease that require valve intervention
4. Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position. (of note, mitral ring is not an exclusion)
5. Subject is high-risk for SAVR as determined by the local heart team
6. Subject refuses SAVR as a treatment option
7. Subject is selected for aortic valve repair or aortic surgery
8. Need for emergency surgery or TAVR for any reason
9. Anatomical exclusion criteria (ANY of the following):
10. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of the screening visit
11. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation within 30 days of the screening visit
12. Any condition considered a contraindication to mechanical circulatory support
13. Hostile chest or conditions or complications from prior surgery that preclude safe reoperation (e.g., mediastinitis, radiation damage, abnormal chest wall, adhesion of aorta or IMA to sternum, etc.)
14. Subject refuses blood transfusion
15. Marfan syndrome or other known connective tissue disease that would necessitate aortic root replacement/intervention
16. Evidence of acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the screening visit
17. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days of the screening visit (Subjects with placement of coronary or peripheral stent(s) should be assessed for the ability to safely proceed with SAVR within the protocol timeframe)
18. Complex coronary artery disease (one of the following):
19. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or carotid intervention within 30 days of the screening visit
20. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the screening visit
21. Severe left ventricular dysfunction, defined as a resting left ventricular ejection fraction <25%; or left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) >70 mm; or the presence of an artificial heart or left ventricular assist device; or being listed for heart transplantation or status post heart transplantation.
22. Moderate to severe or worse right ventricular dysfunction on resting echocardiogram according to core laboratory
23. Cardiac imaging (echocardiography, CT, and/or MRI) evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
24. Left atrial thrombus without continuous appropriate anticoagulation within 90 days of the study procedure
25. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (i.e., resting heart rate >120 bpm)
26. Hemodynamically significant hypertrophic Obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), Peak LVOT gradient ≥50mmHg (resting or provoked) ESC 2022/ ACC 2020
27. Untread Leukopenia (WBC<3.0*109/L), Untread Thrombocytopenia (Platelet count <50*109), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states, Acute posthemorrhagic anemia (hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL)
28. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1 <50% predicted) or currently on home oxygen
29. Severe pulmonary hypertension (e.g., PA systolic pressure ≥2/3 systemic pressure)
30. Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh C) or any active liver disease
31. Renal insufficiency (eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m²) and/or requiring chronic peritoneal dialysis at the time of screening and/or requiring chronic hemodialysis at the time of screening
32. Ongoing sepsis or active infective endocarditis with ongoing antibiotic (including suppressive) therapy or positive blood cultures within 6 weeks
33. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications (or inability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), implant-related materials, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
34. Inability to tolerate anti-thrombotic/anticoagulation therapy during or after the valve implant procedure
35. Active gastrointestinal bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
36. BMI >50 kg/m2 or <18.5 kg/m2
37. Estimated life expectancy <24 months due to associated non- cardiac comorbid conditions
38. Immobility that would prevent completion of study procedures
39. Currently participating in a cardiovascular investigational drug or another device study and not yet completed follow-up for the primary endpoint. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Observational studies are not considered exclusionary
40. Severe cognitive decline (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits)
41. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant (women suspected of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum or urine test for human chorionic gonadotropin before being included in the study)
42. Other patients considered unsuitable for this clinical study by the investigator
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jian'an Wang, MD | Contact | +86-571-8778-4808 | wangjianan111@zju.edu.cn |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jian'an Wang, MD | Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University | Not yet recruiting | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100000 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device | Device | Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)using commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device |
|
| 30 days |
| Moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatch as measured by echocardiography | Comparing moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatched in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Cardiovascular rehospitalization | Comparing the number of cardiovascular rehospitalizations in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Health-related quality of life assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23) | Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR. | 30 days |
| Length of index hospitalization | Comparing TAVR length of index hospitalization with SAVR | Pre-intervention/procedure surgery |
| Composite primary endpoints | Comparing the superiority of the composite primary endpoint and its components in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
Freedom of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
| years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
| Mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular) | Comparing mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days,6 months and years 1, 5, 10 |
| Stroke (disabling and nondisabling) | Comparing stroke (disabling and nondisabling) in TAVR with SAVR | 30days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10 |
| Death or stroke | Comparing death or stroke in TAVR with SAVR | 1 year |
| Death or disabling stroke | Comparing death or disabling strokein TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, and 1 year |
| Major vascular complications | Comparing major vascular complications in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Other procedural or valve-related complications | Comparing other procedural or valve-related complications in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Technical success | Comparing technical success in TAVR with SAVR | Exit from procedure room |
| Device success | Comparing device success in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Myocardial infarction | Comparing myocardial infarction in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months and 1 year |
| Coronary obstruction requiring intervention | Comparing coronary obstruction requiring intervention in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months and 1 year |
| Acute kidney injury | Comparing acute kidney injury in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Renal replacement therapy | Comparing renal replacement therapy in TAVR with SAVR | 1 year |
| New permanent pacemaker implantation | Comparing new permanent pacemaker implantation in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10 |
| Conduction disturbance and arrhythmias | Comparing conduction disturbance and arrhythmias in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days,6 months and 1 year |
| New York Heart Association class | Comparing change in New York Heart Association class in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, and 10 |
| Hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography | Comparing hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months and at years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10. |
| Other echocardiographic parameters | Comparing other echocardiographic parameters in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, and years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10. |
| Cardiovascular rehospitalization | Comparing cardiovascular rehospitalizations( the time to first event and number of events) in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years |
| ICU days | Comparing ICU days in TAVR with SAVR | Time from immediate post-operation to ICU discharge |
| Redo valve replacement | Comparing redo valve replacement in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years |
| Six-minute walk test | Comparing change in six-minute walk test in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days,6 months, and 1year |
| Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by KCCQ-23 | Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR | 30 Days,6 months,1 year |
| Early safety | Comparing early safety in TAVR with SAVR | 30 days |
| Clinical efficacy | Comparing clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR | 1 year, and annually until 10 years |
| Valve related long-term clinical efficacy | Comparing valve related long-term clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR | 5 years and thereafter until 10 years |
| Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Not yet recruiting | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100000 | China |
|
| Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510000 | China |
|
| Prince of Wales Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 999077 | China |
|
| Queen Mary Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 999077 | China |
|
| Nanjing First Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Nanjing | Jiangsu | 210000 | China |
|
| Xijing Hospital affiliated to Air Force Medical University | Not yet recruiting | Xi'an | Shaanxi | 710000 | China |
|
| Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University | Not yet recruiting | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200000 | China |
|
| Cheng Hsin General Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Taibei | Taiwan | 100-116 | China |
|
| National Taiwan University Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Taibei | Taiwan | 100116 | China |
|
| The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Not yet recruiting | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310000 | China |
|
| The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Recruiting | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310009 | China |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001022 | Aortic Valve Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided