Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective is to assess the effect of increased PEEP on echo-Doppler venous congestion in ARDS patients at two PEEP levels, by grading congestion in each venous flow (suprahepatic, renal, portal) as "absent," "moderate," or "severe," and also calculating the VExUS score.
All analyzes will be carried out with collection intention. All information required by the protocol is obtained from the clinical file of the Intensive care and Hyperbaric Medicine department of Angers University Hospital. This research is not involving humans on prospective data from care. This research does not require any specific investigation and does not involve no changes to support.
Clinical and biological data to be collected at inclusion (D1) :
Assessments to be carried out as part of routine care on D1, between D3 and D5 and between D6 and D8 :
Measures relating to the mechanics of the respiratory system:
At the two PEEP levels, the investigator will retrospectively collect the following clinical, biological, and echographic measurements, which were prospectively recorded by the clinician.
Cardiac ultrasound:
Evaluation of venous congestion by Doppler of the veins :
Venous congestion is initially assessed by studying each flow individually. Doppler (suprahepatic veins, renal interlobar veins and portal vein) and graded in "absent", "moderate" or "severe" as follows :
Then the VExUS score, integrating these three signals as well as the study of the diameter of the inferior vena cavan by ultrasound, is calculated as follows:
Grade 0 "absence of congestion": VCi < 20mm;
Grade 1 "mild congestion": VCi ≥ 20 mm and suprahepatic venous Doppler, portal and renal normal or with signs of moderate congestion;
Grade 2 "moderate congestion": VCi ≥ 20 mm and presence one venous flow (suprahepatic, portal, or renal) showing evidence of severe congestion;
Grade 3 "severe congestion": VCi ≥ 20 mm and presence of several flows vein showing signs of severe congestion.
Collection of renal function with:
Collection of weight and input-output balance
The echocardiographic data collected at inclusion and during follow-up will be processed a posteriori by two different observers.
End of monitoring data (D28):
During this visit, the following elements will be collected:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARDS (Acute respiratory distress syndrome) | Patient with ARDS who are placed on mechanical ventilation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-interventionnal study | Other | Non-interventionnal study |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evolution of the level of venous congestion evaluated on the different abdominal Doppler venous flows (portal, suprahepatic and renal venous Doppler) and on the VExUS score between the different levels of PEEP (high and low) | The evolution of venous congestion between two PEEP levels (high and low), assessed by analyzing each Doppler flow individually (hepatic veins, renal interlobar veins, and portal vein) and grading them as 'absent,' 'moderate,' or 'severe,' as well as by the VExUS score, graded from 0 to 3. | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In patients with a pulmonary artery catheter: evolution between venous congestion in abdominal venous flow and the VExUS score with right heart pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressure at D1, D3-D5 and D6-D8) | Measurement of pulmonary pressures (PAPs, PAPm, PAPd, PAPO) via Swan-Ganz catheters at each PEEP level (high and low) | From Baseline to day 8 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
All patients hospitalized in the Medical Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine Unit of Angers University Hospital, receiving mechanical ventilation in assist-control mode (A/C ventilation), and presenting with ARDS
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierre ASFAR | Contact | 241353637 | +33 | pierre.asfar@chu-angers.fr |
| Pierre ASFAR | Contact | pierre.asfar@chu-angers.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pierre ASFAR | University Hospital of Angers | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital of Angers | Angers | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20693377 | Background | Li G, Malinchoc M, Cartin-Ceba R, Venkata CV, Kor DJ, Peters SG, Hubmayr RD, Gajic O. Eight-year trend of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan 1;183(1):59-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201003-0436OC. Epub 2010 Aug 6. | |
| 26903337 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Evaluate the evolution of venous congestion (VExUS score) according to the PEEP level over time (D1, D3-D5 and D6-D8) for each patient individually | From baseline to Day 8 |
| Evaluate the evolution of venous congestion in abdominal venous flows and the VExUS score according to PEEP level | From baseline to Day 8 |
| Incidence of acute renal failure at day 28 in patients with markers of significant venous congestion | Vexus score greater than or equal to 2 and/or change in portal flow, renal venous flow, or suprahepatic venous flow | From baseline to day 28 |
| Incidence of renal replacement therapy on day 28 in patients with markers of significant venous congestion | Description: score greater than or equal to 2 and/or change in portal flow, renal venous flow, or suprahepatic venous flow | From baseline to Day 28 |
| Evolution of the level of venous congestion evaluated on the different abdominal Doppler venous flows (portal, suprahepatic and renal venous Doppler) and on the VExUS score between the different levels of PEEP (high and low) | The evolution of venous congestion between two PEEP levels (high and low), assessed by analyzing each Doppler flow individually (hepatic veins, renal interlobar veins, and portal vein) and grading them as 'absent,' 'moderate,' or 'severe,' as well as by the VExUS score, graded from 0 to 3. | from day 3 to day 5 |
| Evolution of the level of venous congestion evaluated on the different abdominal Doppler venous flows (portal, suprahepatic and renal venous Doppler) and on the VExUS score between the different levels of PEEP (high and low) | The evolution of venous congestion between two PEEP levels (high and low), assessed by analyzing each Doppler flow individually (hepatic veins, renal interlobar veins, and portal vein) and grading them as 'absent,' 'moderate,' or 'severe,' as well as by the VExUS score, graded from 0 to 3. | From Day 6 to Day 8 |
| Evolution between venous congestion in abdominal venous flow and the VExUS score and echocardiographic markers of right heart function (D1, D3-D5 and D6-D8) | Measurement of TAPSE (Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion), tricuspid S' wave, peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity at each PEEP level (high and low) | From baseline to day 8 |
| Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. |
| 37326646 | Background | Grasselli G, Calfee CS, Camporota L, Poole D, Amato MBP, Antonelli M, Arabi YM, Baroncelli F, Beitler JR, Bellani G, Bellingan G, Blackwood B, Bos LDJ, Brochard L, Brodie D, Burns KEA, Combes A, D'Arrigo S, De Backer D, Demoule A, Einav S, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Frat JP, Gattinoni L, Guerin C, Herridge MS, Hodgson C, Hough CL, Jaber S, Juffermans NP, Karagiannidis C, Kesecioglu J, Kwizera A, Laffey JG, Mancebo J, Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Meyer NJ, Moss M, Munshi L, Myatra SN, Ng Gong M, Papazian L, Patel BK, Pellegrini M, Perner A, Pesenti A, Piquilloud L, Qiu H, Ranieri MV, Riviello E, Slutsky AS, Stapleton RD, Summers C, Thompson TB, Valente Barbas CS, Villar J, Ware LB, Weiss B, Zampieri FG, Azoulay E, Cecconi M; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012128 | Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
| D006940 | Hyperemia |
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided