Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of TETRANITE, a bioresorbable bone adhesive, for Cranial Flap Fixation as compared to traditional metal hardware.
This two arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of TETRANITE, a bioresorbable bone adhesive, for Cranial Flap Fixation as compared to traditional metal hardware. The control arm for this study is the standard of care plating system. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the TETRANITE arm, or the standard of care plating system arm. Participants will generally follow their standard of care follow-up for surgery for one year.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TETRANITE Bone Adhesive | Experimental | These participants will receive tetranite to re-adhere the cranial flap following a craniotomy. |
|
| Standard of Care Plating System | Active Comparator | These participants will receive the standard of care plating system to re-adhere the cranial flap following a craniotomy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetranite for Cranial Flap Fixation | Combination Product | Tetranite for Cranial Flap Fixation is a bioresorbable bone adhesive that can be used to re-adhere the cranial flap following a craniotomy. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Flap immobility at final surgical fixation (patient) | Immobility of the flap prior to surgical closure, assessed by the principal investigator and an independent neurosurgeon. | At enrollment surgery |
| Flap immobility at 6 months (surgeon) | Flap immobility assessed through a flap mobility assessment by the principal investigator and an independent neurosurgeon. | 6 months after index surgery |
| No incidence of serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related within 6 months of index surgery. | No incidence of serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related within 6 months of index surgery. | 6 months from enrollment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Flap immobility through 12 months (patient) | Flap immobility assessed by the patient through a survey. | 12 months |
| Serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related beyond 6 months of index surgery. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject, and/or subject's family are able and willing to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to any study related procedures.
Intra-Operative Inclusion Criteria:
• Width of craniotomy kerf line < 3mm for more than 75% of the bone flap border.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has undergone a previous, open intracranial neurosurgical procedure in the same anatomical location. (Note: stereotactic biopsy is not exclusionary).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gracie Cleaver | Contact | 862-202-3109 | gcleaver@revbio.com | |
| Sarah Moss | Contact | 281-795-1812 | smoss@primepathmedtech.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard of Care Plating System | Device | The standard of care titanium plates and screws will be used to re-adhere the cranial flap following a craniotomy. |
|
Serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related beyond 6 months of index surgery. |
| 6 months from enrollment to 12 months |
| Adverse events, including CSF leaks or wound dehiscence | Adverse events, including CSF leaks or wound dehiscence | From enrollment through 12 months after index surgery. |
| Patient reported outcome using PROMIS10 | Survey sent to the patient to complete independently. | Enrollment through 12 months from index surgery. |
| Patient reported outcome using VAS Pain Score | Survey sent to the patient to complete independently. | Enrollment through 12 months from index surgery |
| Patient reported outcome using Cranio-Facial PROMS | Survey sent to the patient to complete independently. | Enrollment through 12 months from index surgery |
| Flap volume change to assess growth/atrophy based on CT at 6 and 12 Months | Flap volume change to assess growth/atrophy based on CT at 6 and 12 Months | 6 months and 12 months |
| Flap fusion to assess bony bridging of the kerf and burr holes via kerf and burr hole gap volume increase/decrease based on CT at 6 and 12 Months | Flap fusion to assess bony bridging of the kerf and burr holes via kerf and burr hole gap volume increase/decrease based on CT at 6 and 12 Months | 6 months and 12 months |
| Flap congruence to assess immediate post-operative conformance to surrounding bone | Flap congruence to assess immediate post-operative conformance to surrounding bone | 1-4 days from index surgery (+7/-3) |
| Flap displacement to assess migration via peak displacement of the flap surface based on CT at 6 and 12 Months compared to post-operative placement | Flap displacement to assess migration via peak displacement of the flap surface based on CT at 6 and 12 Months compared to post-operative placement | 6 months and 12 months |
| Artifact assessment of distortion that obscures lesion detection based on available standard of care MRI throughout the 12- month study period | Artifact assessment of distortion that obscures lesion detection based on available standard of care MRI throughout the 12- month study period | From enrollment through 12 months following index procedure |