Effect of Negative-Pressure Drainage Versus Pancreatic Duct Stenting for Preventing Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Papillectomy for Duodenal Papillary Tumors

Effect of Negative-Pressure Drainage Versus Pancreatic Duct Stenting for Preventing Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Papillectomy for Duodenal Papillary Tumors: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of negative-pressure duodenal drainage compared with prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting in preventing post-endoscopic papillectomy (EP) pancreatitis. Eligible patients undergoing EP will be randomized 1:1 to receive either negative-pressure drainage or pancreatic duct stenting. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-EP pancreatitis. Secondary outcomes include other procedure-related complications, procedure time, technical success, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, en-bloc and R0 resection rates, and postoperative hyperamylasemia.

This study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate two postoperative drainage strategies following endoscopic papillectomy (EP). Patients scheduled for EP for duodenal papillary neoplasms will be screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. After providing written informed consent, eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the negative-pressure drainage group or the pancreatic duct stent group.

All participants will undergo standardized EP performed by experienced endoscopists. According to group assignment, either a nasally inserted negative-pressure drainage tube or a prophylactic pancreatic duct stent will be placed intraoperatively. Postoperative management includes intravenous fluids and nutritional support, fasting for the first 48 hours, and routine medications to prevent infection, pancreatitis, and bleeding. Diet will be gradually resumed based on clinical and imaging assessments.

Throughout hospitalization, key clinical outcomes will be recorded, including the incidence of post-EP pancreatitis, other procedure-related complications, procedure time, technical success, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, resection quality (en-bloc and R0 resection rates), and postoperative hyperamylasemia. All participants will undergo inpatient postoperative monitoring and a scheduled 1-month follow-up visit to collect clinical status, laboratory results, and device-related information.

The study team will perform statistical analyses based on follow-up data to compare the efficacy and safety of the two drainage strategies. The findings are expected to clarify the clinical value of negative-pressure duodenal drainage and provide evidence to guide optimization of postoperative management after endoscopic papillectomy.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age between 18 and 75 years
2. Preoperative diagnosis of duodenal papillary adenoma or early-stage adenocarcinoma (≤T1a)
3. Scheduled to undergo endoscopic papillectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Preoperative diagnosis suggestive of adenocarcinoma ≥T1b stage.
2. Preoperative imaging indicating intraductal extension into the pancreatic or bile duct ≥20 mm.
3. Lesion diameter >40 mm, location adjacent to a duodenal diverticulum, or other anatomical or technical factors deemed unsuitable for endoscopic resection.
4. Known familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
5. Severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding tolerance of anesthesia or endoscopic procedures.
6. Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
7. Pregnancy or lactation.