Resin Infiltration Versus Ionomer-Based Fluoride Varnish to Prevent Post-Eruptive Breakdown in Molars With Mild Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
Resin Infiltration Versus Ionomer-Based Fluoride Varnish to Prevent Post-Eruptive Breakdown in Molars With Mild Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
round/Objective: The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a resin infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) compared to an ionomer-based fluoride varnish (Clinpro XT®, 3M) in preventing post-eruptive enamel breakdown (PEB) in permanent molars with mild Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH).
Research Question: Can resin infiltration effectively prevent post-eruptive enamel breakdown in permanent molars with mild MIH compared to an ionomer-based fluoride varnish? Methodology: The researchers will compare the resin infiltrant Icon® (DMG) with Clinpro XT® Varnish (3M) to prevent post-eruptive enamel breakdown in permanent molars with mild MIH.
Participants:
Children aged 6 to 13 years presenting at least two permanent molars affected by mild MIH, with no prior structural loss or previous dental treatment.
Requirement to attend follow-up evaluations at 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: