Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Neo Putty MTA Versus Formocresol Used in Vital Pulpotomy of Mandibular Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Neo Putty MTA Versus Formocresol Used in Vital Pulpotomy of Mandibular Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of NeoPutty MTA compared to formocresol in vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars in children aged 4 to 9 years. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups (1:1) to receive pulpotomy using either NeoPutty MTA or formocresol, followed by restoration with stainless steel crowns. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be assessed during follow-up visits.
Pulpotomy is a commonly performed vital pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry. Formocresol has been widely used due to its high clinical success; however, concerns exist regarding its potential toxicity. NeoPutty MTA is a premixed bioceramic material introduced as an alternative pulpotomy agent with improved handling properties and bioactivity. This randomized parallel-group clinical trial will compare NeoPutty MTA versus formocresol in vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars. Children aged 4-9 years presenting with asymptomatic carious mandibular primary molars will be recruited from the Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, MSA University. Eligible teeth will undergo standardized pulpotomy procedures, restoration with glass ionomer cement, and stainless steel crowns. Clinical and radiographic follow-up will be performed at scheduled intervals to evaluate success and failure outcomes.
Inclusion Criteria:
Children with asymptomatic decayed primary mandibular molar(s).
Exclusion Criteria:
ahmed.shawky3@msa.edu.eg+201124465202