Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-520821-19-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the use of rapamycin cream can be used as a treatment together with pulsed dyed laser in treating port wine stain birthmarks. The main question it aims to answer is:
Will rapamycin cream and laser treatment show a greater improvement in appearance of port wine birthmarks, compared to treatment with placebo cream and laser?
Researchers will compare two concentrations of rapamycin cream (0.6% or 1.0%) with placebo treatment to see if appearance is improved following 12 weeks of treatment.
Participants will receive laser treatment of their port wine birthmark and then apply the rapamycin or placebo cream daily for 12 weeks. Patients will visit the clinic every 4 weeks for checkups and tests.
This is a single-centre, double-blind, randomized withdrawal design, parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical study investigating the efficacy and safety of two concentrations of topical rapamycin cream in the treatment of port wine stain as an adjunct to pulsed dyed laser (PDL) in paediatric patients. 30 participants will be enrolled into the study.
The study hypothesis is that topical rapamycin, as an adjunct to PDL, will show a dose-dependent increase in the blanching of port wine birthmarks, compared to PDL with placebo after 12 weeks.
Eligible participants will undergo PDL treatment of their entire port wine birthmark. Patients that respond positively to PDL within 5 days will be enrolled and randomized, before the first application of the study drug. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three possible treatments in a 1:1:1 ratio:
During this phase of the study, four clinical visits will occur, one every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Assessment of the extent and severity of birthmark size and colour will be performed at randomization, at each clinical visit, and at follow-up using photography and percentage improvement ratings. Safety will be assessed by recording all adverse events experienced and testing blood rapamycin concentration at prior to treatment and at the last clinical visit.
Follow-up will be performed 28 days after the last cream application. An extra PDL session will be optionally provided at the follow-up appointment. If PDL treatment occurs at the follow-up visit, a further follow-up phone call will occur 7±2 days after the second PDL session to assess concomitant medications and adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6% rapamycin | Experimental | 0.6% rapamycin cream applied daily |
|
| 1.0% rapamycin cream | Experimental | 1.0% rapamycin cream applied daily |
|
| Placebo cream | Placebo Comparator | Placebo cream applied daily |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapamycin cream | Drug | Application of rapamycin cream to port wine birthmark |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinic Objective improvement rating at week 12 | The average percentage improvement (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain appearance in the cream treated area from baseline to week 12, or at last visit if early withdrawal/discontinuation occurs, as assessed by the principal investigator during the clinic visit. | From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective improvement rating (all timepoints) | Subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain from baseline after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. | From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective improvement rating change at follow-up | Subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area from baseline at follow-up visit | From before laser treatment to follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Subjective improvement rating (post-treatment) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Boddington, PhD | Contact | +6494880232 | 735 | laura.boddington@aftpharm.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ioana Stanescu | AFT Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driscoll Children's Hospital | Corpus Christi | Texas | 78411 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018324 | Hemangioma, Capillary |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006391 | Hemangioma |
| D009383 | Neoplasms, Vascular Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
A Phase II, proof of concept, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, dose-response comparison, with a secondary self-controlled assessment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Pulsed dyed laser | Procedure | Pulsed dyed laser (PDL) treatment of port wine birthmark |
|
| Clinic Objective improvement rating (all timepoints) |
Clinic Objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) in port wine stain from baseline after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment |
| From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application |
| Photographic Objective improvement rating (all timepoints) | Photographic Objective improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome), assessed by a committee of three dermatologists, in port wine stain from baseline after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment | From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application |
Subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area between week 12 and follow-up |
| 4 weeks between end of treatment and follow-up visit |
| Clinic Objective improvement rating change at follow-up | Clinic Objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area from baseline at follow-up visit | From before laser treatment to follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Clinic Objective improvement rating (post-treatment) | Clinic Objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area between week 12 and follow-up | 4 weeks between end of treatment and follow-up visit |
| Photographic Objective improvement rating change at follow-up | Photographic Objective improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome), assessed by a committee of three dermatologists, change of cream treated area from baseline at follow-up visit | From before laser treatment to follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Photographic Objective improvement rating (post-treatment) | Photographic Objective improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome), assessed by a committee of three dermatologists, change of cream treated area between week 12 and follow-up | 4 weeks between end of treatment and follow-up visit |
| Categorical Improvement of port wine stain | Categorical Improvement (5-point scale with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain in cream treated area from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment. | From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application |
| Colorimetry rating (all timepoints) | Change in extent and intensity of port wine stain colour of the cream treated area from baseline at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment, measured using a colorimetry system through standardized clinical photographs | From before laser treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Colorimetry intra-patient rating | Difference in extent and intensity of port wine stain colour between the two treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (pre-laser baseline, weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment) using the colorimetry system | From before laser treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Subjective intra-patient rating | Difference in subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain between the treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (week 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment) | From start of cream treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Clinic Objective intra-patient rating | Difference in clinic objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain between the treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (week 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment) | From start of cream treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Photographic Objective intra-patient rating | Difference in photographic objective (committee) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain between the treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (week 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment) | From start of cream treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks) |
| Sant Joan de Déu University Hospital | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08950 | Spain |
|