Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluated a conservative treatment approach for replacing a missing upper front tooth (maxillary incisor). The treatment involved an all-ceramic, resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis designed as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional bridges.
The prostheses were fabricated from lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and were designed either with a single retainer (bonded to one adjacent tooth) or with two retainers (bonded to two adjacent teeth). All restorations were bonded using light-curing resin cement.
The study assessed the clinical performance of these prostheses over a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Clinical evaluation included assessment of prosthesis integrity and function during the observation period.
This retrospective case series evaluated the short-term clinical performance of veneer fixed dental prostheses used to replace a missing maxillary incisor. The prostheses were fabricated from lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press).
The retainers consisted of labial ceramic veneers bonded to the enamel surfaces of adjacent teeth. Two prosthetic designs were included: a single-retainer (cantilever) design and a two-retainer design. All veneer retainers were cemented using a light-curing resin cement according to standard adhesive clinical procedures.
Existing patient records were reviewed to assess prosthesis survival and clinical success during follow-up visits. Survival was defined as the prosthesis remaining in situ during the observation period. Clinical success was evaluated based on prosthesis integrity, maintenance of function, and absence of technical complications such as fracture or loss of retention. Follow-up duration was at least 12 months after cementation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient with missing maxillary incisor | Adult patients that have missing an incisor which needs replacement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium disilicate double retainer veneer bridge | Device | Replacing missing maxillary incisor with single retainer lithium disilicate veneer bridge |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | The percentage of successful emax veneer briges | 12 months |
| Success rate | The percentage of clinically successful bridge after the observation time | 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Group of people > 18 years old with no parafunctional habit
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nabil Alhouri, PhD | Damascus University, Faculty of Dentistry | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34893319 | Background | Al-Bermani ASA, Quigley NP, Ha WN. Do zirconia single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses present a viable treatment option for the replacement of missing anterior teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Oct;130(4):533-542. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Dec 7. | |
| 28985448 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Study was done from 2011 to 2015
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
e.max veneer bridge
| Lithium disilicate single retainer veneer bridge | Device | Replacing missing maxillary incisor with double retainer lithium disilicate veneer bridge |
|
| Chen J, Cai H, Ren X, Suo L, Pei X, Wan Q. A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates of All-Ceramic Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul;27(6):535-543. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12678. Epub 2017 Oct 6. |