Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to investigate the effects of different exercise approaches on physical status, cognitive functions, brain structures, and blood biomarkers in individuals with chronic neck pain.
Chronic neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder. It has been stated in the literature that in addition to physical disabilities, cognitive problems may also be observed in these individuals. Still, the neurophysiological and biochemical mechanisms related to these disabilities are not yet sufficiently clear. Previous studies conducted on individuals with chronic neck pain are mostly evaluation studies aimed at existing disabilities, and our planned study seeks to achieve positive improvements in these disabilities by applying a treatment approach known to be effective on physical and cognitive health, such as exercise. Within the scope of the project, neuropsychological tests will be applied to the participants to evaluate attention, memory, visual and spatial structuring, language skills, and executive functions. Participants' brain structural changes will be evaluated with T1-weighted imaging, and brain perfusion changes will be evaluated with Arterial Spin Labeling imaging. Within the scope of physical condition and pain-related evaluations, participants' pain intensity, neck disability levels, muscle strength, functional capacities, pain catastrophizing level, kinesiophobia, central sensitization, and sleep quality will be evaluated. Finally, blood samples of the participants will be collected and serum concentrations of Cortisol, Interleukin 1-Beta, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1, Interleukin-10, Irisin, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Nerve Growth Factor and Cathepsin-B will be examined. All these assessments will be applied both before and after the exercise applications, and only muscle strength and functional capacities will be measured again at the end of the 6th week so that the exercise program can progress according to the gains in physical condition. Individuals whose initial assessments are completed will be assigned to aerobic exercise, strength exercises, or home exercise control group by stratified randomization method. Exercise applications will be applied 3 days a week for 3 months and each participant will participate in a total of 36 exercise sessions individually. It is anticipated that revealing the cognitive, physical, neurophysiological, and biochemical effects of aerobic, strengthening, and home exercise practices in individuals with chronic neck pain and explaining the similarities and superiorities of different exercise practices will pave the way for planning targeted health services.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobic exercise group | Experimental | Aerobic exercise training will be applied 3 days a week for 3 months and each participant will participate in a total of 36 exercise sessions individually. |
|
| Strengthening exercise group | Experimental | Strengthening exercise training will be applied 3 days a week for 3 months and each participant will participate in a total of 36 exercise sessions individually. |
|
| Posture and stretching exercise group | Other | Posture and stretching exercise training will be applied 3 days a week for 3 months and each participant will participate in a total of 36 exercise sessions individually as the control intervention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobic exercise | Other | Participants will receive a total of 36 sessions of treatment, 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. Aerobic exercise training will be performed with a bicycle ergometer, and a 5-minute warm-up (pedaling without resistance) program will be applied before the exercise training, finished by a 5-minute cool-down program (pedaling without resistance). Details of the intervention is described below: 60% of maximum heart rate, for 30 minutes (1-2nd weeks), 60% of maximum heart rate, for 45 minutes (3-4th weeks), 60% of maximum heart rate, for 60 minutes (5-6th weeks), mid-examination (at the end of the 6th week), 75% of maximum heart rate, for 30 minutes (7-8th weeks), 75% of maximum heart rate, for 45 minutes (9-10th weeks), 75% of maximum heart rate, for 60 minutes (11-12th weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity | Numerical scales are among the frequently used one-dimensional pain intensity scales because they are easy to use and effective. In the application, volunteers are asked to choose the number that best describes their pain intensity. Zero indicates no pain, while 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. | Baseline, 6th week, and 12th week |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global Cognition | Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test was developed as a rapid screening test for mild cognitive impairments. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test evaluates different cognitive performance areas including short-term memory, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, language, orientation to time and place. The highest total score that can be obtained from the test is 30 points. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeynep Güven, MsC | Contact | 90+3123052525 | 130 | fztzeynepguven@gmail.com |
| Songul Atasavun-Uysal, Professor | Contact | +903123052525 | 130 | songula@hacettepe.edu.tr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmet Ilkay Isikay, Associate Professor | Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University | Study Chair |
| Asli Pinar, Professor | Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology, Hacettepe University |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation | Recruiting | Ankara | Altindag | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019547 | Neck Pain |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D011187 | Posture |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be assigned into 3 groups: aerobic exercise group, strengthening exercises group or control group. Assignment to groups will conduct with the stratified block randomization technique according to age, gender and education level variables.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Strengthening exercise | Other | A 5-minute warm-up (neck and upper extremity range of motion exercises) will be applied before the exercise training, and finished by a 5-minute cool-down program (neck and upper extremity range of motion exercises). Details of the intervention is described below: Isometric neck exercise (MVC 80%,2x10) and Theraband resistive neck and upper body exercises 10 RM-2x10 (1-2nd weeks), Isometric neck exercise (MVC 80%,3x10) and Theraband resistive neck and upper body exercises 10 RM-3x10 (3-4th weeks), Isometric neck exercise (MVC 80%,3x15) and Theraband resistive neck and upper body exercises 10 RM-3x15 (5-6th weeks) , mid-examination (6th week), Isometric neck exercise (MVC 80%,2x10) Theraband resistive neck and upper body exercises 10 RM-2x10 (7-8th weeks), Isometric neck exercise (MVC 80%,3x10) Theraband resistive neck and upper body exercises 10 RM-3x10 (9-10th weeks), Isometric neck exercise (MVC 80%,3x15) Theraband resistive neck and upper body exercises 10 RM-3x15 (11-12th weeks) |
|
| Posture and strentching exercise | Other | Posture and stretching exercises and stretching exercises will be applied as a control treatment to volunteers with chronic neck pain included in the control group, and at the end of the study, these people will be included in the training program according to the exercise approach that is effective. |
|
| Baseline and 12th week |
| Biochemical Measurements | Blood samples will be taken from the participants before and after the exercise treatment in order to observe the changes in blood biomarkers and to reveal the relationship between the masurements and serum levels of the biomarkers. Cortisol, Interleukin 1 Beta, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1, Interleukin-10, Irisin, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Nerve Growth Factor and Cathepsin B will be measured in the blood samples taken before and after the exercise treatment. The blood samples taken will be stored at -80°C in a centrifuged manner until they are analyzed. 8 milliliters of blood will be taken from the participants. The serum will be studied and all parameters will be evaluated with the ELISA kit. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Neuromaging | Brain structural and perfusion weighted imaging magnetic resonance images will be taken to observe changes in brain structure and functions before and after exercise treatment of participants to reveal the relationship between the measurements and brain changes. Structural images will consist of imaging in different sequences and planes (sagittal T1A, isovolumetric axial T1A, axial and coronal T2A, FLAIR (Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery), diffusion-weighted imaging, SWI (Susceptibility Weighted Imaging). The obtained radiological images will be analyzed in the FreeSurfer image processing program. After the images are processed with the FreeSurfer software, quantitative vertex-based processing will be used to obtain data such as cortical thickness, gray matter volume and cerebral blood flow in a highly sensitive manner. For each region of interest (ROI) in the Desikan-Killiany atlas, volume, cortical thickness, mean arterial time and cerebral blood flow data will be calculated. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Cognitive Functions | Trail Making Test: It is used to evaluate selective and sustained attention, visual scanning, information processing speed, and executive functions. The Turkish standardization study of the test was conducted. The test has two parts, A and B. Part A of the test consists of randomly arranging the numbers in circles, and the participant is asked to combine the numbers in order and without lifting the pen. In part B, both the numbers and the letters are randomly arranged in circles. There is a simplified sample exercise section for each section. The participants is asked to combine the numbers and letters without lifting the pen and by paying attention to the order, so that one number becomes one letter. The time it takes the volunteer to complete each section will be recorded. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Cognitive Functions | The Stroop Test is a brief measure of selective or focused attention, the ability to switch from one perceptual state to another in the test and to inhibit cognitive interference. It measures concentration and the ability to resist distractions. A Turkish standardization study was conducted and its norms were determined. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Cognitive Functions | Standardized Mini Mental Test is used to determine cognitive level. The validity and reliability study of the test in Turkish was conducted. The scores that can be obtained from the test can vary between 0 and 30 points. The cut-off score for mild and moderate dementia in our country was reported as 23/24. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index | The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale were established. The scale is a 19-item scale consisting of 7 components that assess sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, sleep medication use, and daytime functional impairment. Some components consist of a single item, while others are grouped together. Each item is scored between 0 and 3 points. The total scale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poor sleep quality. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Pressure Pain Thresholds | To objectively assess central sensitization, the pressure pain thresholds of the volunteers will be evaluated. A digital algometer will be used for this measurement. A symptomatic local region (middle trapezius muscle midway between the spinous process of C7 and the lateral border of the acromion) and at asymptomatic distant region (quadriceps muscle midway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the basis patellae) will be measured. | Baseline, 6th week, and 12th week |
| Central Sensitization Inventory | This scale was developed for the purpose of evaluating central sensitization. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted. The scale consists of 2 sections, A and B. Section A consists of 25 questions that inquire about the frequency of symptoms that may be associated with central sensitization, while Section B inquires whether the patient has been diagnosed by a physician with a disease thought to be associated with central sensitization, and if so, on what date. Each question is scored from never (0) to always (4). The highest possible score on the scale is 100. An increase in the score on the scale indicates a more severe central sensitization. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale | This scale was developed to assess fear of movement and re-injury to the affected area. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the questionnaire was conducted. The scale uses a 4-point Likert scale (Strongly Disagree=1, Disagree=2, Agree=3, Strongly Agree=4). To calculate the questionnaire score, items 4, 8, 12, and 16 are reversed, and the scores are summed. The total score obtainable from the scale ranges from 17 to 68 points. A higher score indicates a more severe form of kinesiophobia. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale | This scale was developed to assess the level of a person's pain catastrophizing. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the questionnaire was conducted. The scale consists of 13 questions, and each question is scored between 0 and 4 (0=Never, 1=Somewhat, 2=Moderately, 3=Severely, 4=Always). The total score that can be obtained from the scale is between 0 and 52 points. A higher score indicates more severe catastrophizing. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Two-Minute Walk Test | This test was developed as an alternative to the 6-minute walk test. The 2-Minute Walk Test is used as an indicator of physical capacity. The distance walked by volunteers after 2 minutes will be calculated and recorded. | Baseline, 6th week, and 12th week |
| Muscle Strength | A digital dynamometer will be used to assess the isometric strength of the neck muscles. Lovett's muscle test positions will be applied for dynamometric isometric muscle strength measurement. Cervical flexor, cervical extensor, cervical lateral flexor, shoulder flexor, shoulder extensor, shoulder abductor, shoulder horizontal abductor, shoulder horizontal adductor, shoulder internal rotator, shoulder external rotator, elbow flexor, and elbow extensor muscles will be measured. Each measurement will be performed 3 times, and the average value will be recorded in Newtons. | Baseline, 6th week, and 12th week |
| Neck Disability Index | This scale was developed to assess the degree of neck disability in individuals. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale were established. The scale evaluates subjective symptoms and activities of daily living. Items are scored between 0 (no limitation) and 5 (maximum limitation). Based on the total score, 0-4 points indicate no disability, 5-14 points mild, 15-24 points moderate, 25-34 points severe, and 35-50 points complete functional impairment. | Baseline and 12th week |
| Edinburgh Handedness Inventory | This questionnaire is a frequently used scale to determine dominant hand. It questions the hand(s) used in 10 daily living activities, including writing, drawing, throwing, using scissors, using a toothbrush, using a knife without a fork, using a spoon, sweeping with a broom, lighting a match, and opening a box. Scoring is done on a scale of -100 (left hand) to +100 (right hand). Individuals scoring above 40 are classified as right-handed; those scoring between 40 and -40 are classified as ambidextrous (actively using both hands); and those scoring -40 and below are classified as left-handed. A Turkish reliability study of the questionnaire was conducted. | Baseline |
| Demogrphic Data Collection Form | A demographic data collection form will be used to record the volunteers' age, gender, height, weight, education level, years of education, smoking status, and occupation information. After obtaining the volunteers' occupation information, they will be scored according to the occupational scores. According to this scoring system, Level 1 includes people without an occupation. Level 2 includes private household chores, service occupations, transportation, and material handling. Level 3 includes sales occupations, administrative support, protective services, farming, and machine operators. Level 4 includes technicians and precision manufacturing workers. Level 5 includes executive, administrative, and managerial services. Level 6 includes professional specialty occupations. | Baseline |
| Ezgi Yetim Arsava, PhD | Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University | Study Chair |
| Erdem Karabulut, Professor | Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University | Study Chair |
| Rahsan Gocmen, Associate Professor | Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University | Study Chair |
| D001519 | Behavior |