Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101136299 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Horizon Europe | RIA (Topic HORIZON-HLTH-2023-TOOL-05-03) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Matical Innovation SL | UNKNOWN |
| Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | OTHER |
| Jena University Hospital | OTHER |
| Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to create a detailed virtual model to better understand how Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) develops. This model will also help predict heart problem at different stage of the disease.
- Glossary CT : Computed Tomography CVD : Cardio-Vascular Disease HCC : Hepato Cellular Carcinoma MASH : Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis MASLD : Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease MRI : Magnetic Resonance Imaging PET : Positron Emission Tomography SLD : Steatotic Liver Disease TACE : Trans-Arterial ChemoEmbolisation TARE : Trans-Arterial RadioEmbolisation TIPS : Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt US : Ultrasound USE : Ultrasound elastography VCTE : Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography
- Description of the Clininical Study
ARTEMIs retrospective cohort responds to the definition of a "retrospective collection and analysis of health data obtained from individual patients or healthy persons in order to address scientific questions related to the understanding, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring or treatment of a disease, mental illness, or physical condition" as defined in the work programme of this call. In such, the definition of a clinical study as defined by Regulation 536/2014 (on medicinal products) is not applicable in the framework of our study.
The cohort will serve the following main objectives:
- Study rationale Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is presently the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, accounting for a global prevalence of 25.24% (2). Its natural history remains unclear, given the multiple pathways through which disease progression takes place (3), as well as to the shortage of population-based studies addressing its long-term prognosis (4). As an attempt to alleviate the paucity of good quality data on MASLD's natural history (5) and to improve patient's care, the ARTEMIS project envisages to constitute a longitudinal cohort comprising patients at various stages of liver diseases, with emphasis on MASLD (use cases 1 and 2).
Given the remarkable heterogeneity underlying MASLD mechanisms, the deployment of computational models has increased in popularity among the scientific community, as an effective means to unravel this intricate subject (6). In particular, the understanding of the human liver metabolism plays a key role towards a deeper understanding of the main drivers that rule disease progression. In such, mechanistic models play a major role in the representation of the complexity that is inherent to the liver and the gastroenterology system. In a complementary way, machine learning models are expected to respond to more precise questions related to different stages of the disease and related comorbidities, therefore allowing the prediction of diagnosis and prognosis, as well as risk stratification, based upon parameters that are specific to each subpopulation.
In this light, the ARTEMIS cohort will be used to test new hypotheses, as well as to train, validate and evaluate the performance of computational models - including machine-learning models, mechanistic models and associations thereof - aimed to improve the management of MASLD patients. The ARTEMIs cohort will incorporate retrospective multisource data for MASLD patients along the spectrum of the disease, thus including MASH, cirrhosis and HCC patients. The cohort will include patients from 12 centres in 7 countries. The cohort will also incorporate data related to the most relevant comorbidities associated with these populations, most notably, cardiovascular events.
- Extent and evaluation of current knowledge directly linked to the scientific question(s) to be answered by the clinical study
In addition to the complexities concerning its natural history, MASLD has been associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiac events, including coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, heart failure, and arrhythmia. The exact mechanism by which MASLD increases the risk of CVD is not fully understood, but it is thought to be related to the systemic inflammation and metabolic dysfunction associated with the condition.
Several studies have investigated the relationship between MASLD and cardiac events. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2016 (7), analysed 16 prospective and retrospective cohorts with 34,043 adult individuals (36.3% with MASLD) and approximately 2,600 CVD outcomes (>70% CVD deaths) over a median period of 6.9 years. They concluded that MASLD is associated with an increased risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events, although the design of the observational studies did not allow to draw definitive causal inferences.
There is a consensus that MASLD patients should be closely monitored for cardiovascular risk factors and managed accordingly to reduce their risk of developing CVD. Nevertheless, given the high current prevalence of the disease and its expected growth, such monitoring may enormously stress the public healthcare systems.
Solutions that help to stratify those MASLD patients at higher risk of suffering cardiovascular events, are needed. The ARTEMIs cohort is aimed to assist the development of this type of solutions, based on advanced computational models.
- Objective(s) of the clinical study
The ARTEMIs project envisages to consolidate a holistic virtual model allowing, on the one hand, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in MASLD progression, as well as the prediction of cardiovascular events at different stages of the disease. In this light, 4 clinical cases will be considered, wherein theory-based mechanistic and data-driven AI models will be developed and validated, either individually or in association, depending on the clinical questions being raised.
The objective of ARTEMIs cohort is to assess the performance of mechanistic and AI-based models that will be deployed in the different clinical cases, based on their respective sensibility and specificity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARTEMIs cohort |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data recollection | Other | Only data recollection for their use in the training, testing and early validation of computational models (but no other intervention) will be performed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Liver disease progression and regression in MASLD patients | Probability rates of liver disease progression or regression in MASLD patients, including fibrosis stage changes and development of steatohepatitis (MASH), assessed using validated non-invasive tests, imaging techniques, and liver histology when available | From baseline assessment to last available follow-up (minimum 1 year, up to 5 years) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of cardiovascular events in MASLD patients | Occurrence of cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure in MASLD patients during retrospective follow-up. | Up to 5 years after baseline assessment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular complications following TIPS placement or liver transplantation | Incidence of cardiac events, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, symptomatic coronary heart disease, and arrhythmias, in patients with cirrhosis undergoing TIPS placement or liver transplantation. | From intervention to 1 year (TIPS) and up to 5 years (liver transplantation) |
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Clinical Use Case 1: Liver disease staging in MASLD patients - Prediction model of fibrosis changes (progression and regression), with ability to distinguish between fast and non-fast fibrosis progression among MASLD patients.
- Clinical Use case 2: MASLD and progression of cardiovascular diseases
3.1- Clinical Use case 3-TIPS: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who receive TIPS placement.
3.2.- Clinical Use Case 3-LT: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who received liver transplantation.
Age ≥18 years
All patients with cirrhosis (all aetiologies) who were transplanted
4.- Clinical Use Case 4: Prediction of cardiac complications due to HCC treatments* (*Note: includes surgical interventions, ablation, TACE, TARE, SIRT and immunotherapies)
Age ≥18 years
Diagnosis of HCC (any aetiology)
Cross sectional imaging follow-up (any modality) of liver diseases 6 months after treatment
Non-cirrhotic or no more than Child-Pugh B cirrhosis.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Patients without history of prior HCC
Patients with a history of hypertension should be well controlled (< 140/90 mmHg) on a regimen of antihypertensive therapy.
With a minimum follow-up of two years or until death, after diagnosis of HCC
5.- Other populations (participation in control arms)
Age ≥18 years
Subjects presenting cardiac fibrosis, without a known MASLD diagnosis (as controls for use case 2)
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Clinical Use Case 1: Liver disease staging in MASLD patients - Prediction model of fibrosis changes (progression and regression), with ability to distinguish between fast and non-fast fibrosis progression among MASLD patients.
- Clinical Use case 2: MASLD and progression of cardiovascular diseases
3.1- Clinical Use case 3-TIPS: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who receive TIPS placement.
3.2.- Clinical Use Case 3-LT: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension who received liver transplantation.
Patients who were transplanted due to acute liver failure.
Patients who were already transplanted before (retransplant)
Patients who are lost to follow-up in the first 5 years after liver transplant.
4.- Clinical Use Case 4: Prediction of cardiac complications due to HCC treatments* (*Note: includes surgical interventions, ablation, TACE, TARE, SIRT and immunotherapies)
Mixed-tumor HCC based on radiological and/or pathological examination
Uncontrolled inter-current illness or psychiatric illness or social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
Subjects with history of another primary cancer
Fully recovered from any prior surgery and/or radiation and none within 2 weeks of initiating treatment.
Subjects with active hepatitis B or C on antiviral compounds may remain on such treatment, except for interferon.
Subjects with diagnosis of tumor of mixed origin, either from radiological or biopsy report.
5.- Other populations (participation in control arms)
Patients with diagnosis of MASLD
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population description involve a retrospective collection and analysis of health data obtained from individual patients or healthy persons. Patients along the MASLD spectrum will be recruited in 12 participant sites. A researcher will select cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria and process them according to the Project work plan.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Raul Herance, PhD | Contact | 937372444 | 9344 | raul.herance@vhir.org |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vall d´Hebron Institute de Recerca (VHIR) | Barcelona | Barcelona | 08035 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33235462 | Background | Cui TM, Liu Y, Wang JB, Liu LX. Adverse Effects of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2020 Nov 16;13:11725-11740. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S279858. eCollection 2020. | |
| 30841554 | Background | Porcu M, De Silva P, Solinas C, Battaglia A, Schena M, Scartozzi M, Bron D, Suri JS, Willard-Gallo K, Sangiolo D, Saba L. Immunotherapy Associated Pulmonary Toxicity: Biology Behind Clinical and Radiological Features. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 5;11(3):305. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030305. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| German Cancer Research Center | OTHER |
| MEDEX | OTHER |
| EUROPEAN LIVER PATIENTS ASSOCIATION | UNKNOWN |
| Betthera s.r.o. | OTHER |
| Bournemouth University | OTHER |
| University Hospital Heidelberg | OTHER |
| Fundacion Para La Investigacion Hospital La Fe | OTHER |
| University of Roma La Sapienza | OTHER |
| Charite University, Berlin, Germany | OTHER |
| Medical University of Vienna | OTHER |
| Saint-Luc University Hospital | UNKNOWN |
| University of Freiburg | OTHER |
| University of Leipzig | OTHER |
| Sheba Medical Center | OTHER_GOV |
| Imperial College London | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Retrospectively collected biospecimens stored in existing biobanks at participating centers, including liver tissue samples, whole blood, serum, and plasma. Biospecimens are collected as part of routine clinical care or previous cohorts and are reused for secondary analyses such as proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics. No new biospecimen collection is performed as part of this observational study.
| Cardiac complications associated with hepatocellular carcinoma treatments | Occurrence of cardiac-related adverse events following surgical, locoregional, or systemic treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma | Up to 2 years after HCC treatment |
| 34680365 | Background | Shalata W, Abu-Salman A, Steckbeck R, Mathew Jacob B, Massalha I, Yakobson A. Cardiac Toxicity Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 18;13(20):5218. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205218. |
| 32725983 | Background | Chung WB, Youn JC, Youn HJ. Cardiovascular Complications of Novel Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy: Old Problems from New Agents? Korean Circ J. 2020 Sep;50(9):743-753. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0158. Epub 2020 May 27. |
| 27122721 | Background | Liu KL, Chen JS, Chen SC, Chu PH. Cardiovascular Toxicity of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Cancer Patients: A Double-Edged Sword. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2013 Jul;29(4):295-303. |
| 34764464 | Background | Llovet JM, Castet F, Heikenwalder M, Maini MK, Mazzaferro V, Pinato DJ, Pikarsky E, Zhu AX, Finn RS. Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;19(3):151-172. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00573-2. Epub 2021 Nov 11. |
| 37085028 | Background | Ali SA, Arman HE, Shamseddeen H, Elsner N, Elsemesmani H, Johnson S, Zenisek J, Khemka A, Jarori U, Patidar KR, Orman E, Kubal C, Frick K. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: Predictors of major adverse cardiac events and assessment of reversibility after liver transplant. J Cardiol. 2023 Aug;82(2):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 20. |
| 23554120 | Background | Qureshi W, Mittal C, Ahmad U, Alirhayim Z, Hassan S, Qureshi S, Khalid F. Clinical predictors of post-liver transplant new-onset heart failure. Liver Transpl. 2013 Jul;19(7):701-10. doi: 10.1002/lt.23654. Epub 2013 Jun 3. |
| 10915170 | Background | Snowden CP, Hughes T, Rose J, Roberts DR. Pulmonary edema in patients after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2000 Jul;6(4):466-70. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2000.7580. |
| 35441375 | Background | Mohammadi F, Ramachandran J, Woodman R, Muller K, John L, Chen J, Wigg A. Impact of cardiac dysfunction on morbidity and mortality in liver transplant candidates. Clin Transplant. 2022 Jul;36(7):e14682. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14682. Epub 2022 May 16. |
| 29323769 | Background | Sonny A, Govindarajan SR, Jaber WA, Cywinski JB. Systolic heart failure after liver transplantation: Incidence, predictors, and outcome. Clin Transplant. 2018 Mar;32(3):e13199. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13199. Epub 2018 Feb 1. |
| 33088154 | Background | Rajesh S, George T, Philips CA, Ahamed R, Kumbar S, Mohan N, Mohanan M, Augustine P. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis: An exhaustive critical update. World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 7;26(37):5561-5596. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i37.5561. |
| 29181605 | Background | Modha K, Kapoor B, Lopez R, Sands MJ, Carey W. Symptomatic Heart Failure After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement: Incidence, Outcomes, and Predictors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Apr;41(4):564-571. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1848-1. Epub 2017 Nov 27. |
| 35170360 | Background | Ali A, Sarwar A, Patwardhan VR, Fraiche AM, Tahir MM, Luo M, Weinstein JL, Hussain MS, Curry MP, Ahmed M. Echocardiographic and Other Preprocedural Predictors of Heart Failure After TIPS Placement in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Single-Center 15-Year Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Jul;219(1):110-118. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26947. Epub 2022 Feb 16. |
| 31512743 | Background | Billey C, Billet S, Robic MA, Cognet T, Guillaume M, Vinel JP, Peron JM, Lairez O, Bureau C. A Prospective Study Identifying Predictive Factors of Cardiac Decompensation After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: The Toulouse Algorithm. Hepatology. 2019 Dec;70(6):1928-1941. doi: 10.1002/hep.30934. |
| 26390962 | Background | Moye L. What can we do about exploratory analyses in clinical trials? Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 25. |
| 35985548 | Background | van Kleef LA, Kavousi M, de Knegt RJ. Reply to: "Liver stiffness, fatty liver disease and atrial fibrillation in the Rotterdam study: Some issues". J Hepatol. 2022 Nov;77(5):1467-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.030. Epub 2022 Aug 18. No abstract available. |
| 36522149 | Background | Simon TG, Roelstraete B, Alkhouri N, Hagstrom H, Sundstrom J, Ludvigsson JF. Cardiovascular disease risk in paediatric and young adult non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2023 Mar;72(3):573-580. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328105. Epub 2022 Dec 15. |
| 27056158 | Background | Mantovani F, Clavel MA, Michelena HI, Suri RM, Schaff HV, Enriquez-Sarano M. Comprehensive Imaging in Women With Organic Mitral Regurgitation: Implications for Clinical Outcome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.017. |
| 34670043 | Background | Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Diehl A, Dasarathy S, Loomba R, Chalasani N, Kowdley K, Hameed B, Wilson LA, Yates KP, Belt P, Lazo M, Kleiner DE, Behling C, Tonascia J; NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN). Prospective Study of Outcomes in Adults with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1559-1569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029349. |
| 35843374 | Background | Allen AM, Therneau TM, Ahmed OT, Gidener T, Mara KC, Larson JJ, Canning RE, Benson JT, Kamath PS. Clinical course of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the implications for clinical trial design. J Hepatol. 2022 Nov;77(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 16. |
| 25543522 | Background | Singh SP, Misra B, Kar SK, Panigrahi MK, Misra D, Bhuyan P, Pattnaik K, Meher C, Agrawal O, Rout N, Swain M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) without insulin resistance: Is it different? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;39(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Dec 17. |
| 26057287 | Background | Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jun 9;313(22):2263-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5370. |
| 28520105 | Background | Cvitanovic T, Reichert MC, Moskon M, Mraz M, Lammert F, Rozman D. Large-scale computational models of liver metabolism: How far from the clinics? Hepatology. 2017 Oct;66(4):1323-1334. doi: 10.1002/hep.29268. Epub 2017 Aug 30. |
| 34880412 | Background | Tsochatzis EA. Natural history of NAFLD: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;19(3):151-152. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00565-8. No abstract available. |
| 29984130 | Background | Ekstedt M, Nasr P, Kechagias S. Natural History of NAFLD/NASH. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2017;16(4):391-397. doi: 10.1007/s11901-017-0378-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13. |
| 33802047 | Background | Pais R, Maurel T. Natural History of NAFLD. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 10;10(6):1161. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061161. |
| 35206282 | Background | Yuan Q, Wang H, Gao P, Chen W, Lv M, Bai S, Wu J. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease among 73,566 Individuals in Beijing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 13;19(4):2096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042096. |
| 32278004 | Background | Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, Zelber-Sagi S, Wai-Sun Wong V, Dufour JF, Schattenberg JM, Kawaguchi T, Arrese M, Valenti L, Shiha G, Tiribelli C, Yki-Jarvinen H, Fan JG, Gronbaek H, Yilmaz Y, Cortez-Pinto H, Oliveira CP, Bedossa P, Adams LA, Zheng MH, Fouad Y, Chan WK, Mendez-Sanchez N, Ahn SH, Castera L, Bugianesi E, Ratziu V, George J. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020 Jul;73(1):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039. Epub 2020 Apr 8. |