Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ospedale Meyer | OTHER |
| University of Messina | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to learn how well the TouchCare Nano automated insulin delivery system works and how safe it is for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in everyday medical care.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Does using the TouchCare Nano system help people with type 1 diabetes spend more time with their blood glucose in a healthy range? Are serious low blood sugar events or diabetic ketoacidosis uncommon while using this system in daily life? Participants are children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who use the TouchCare Nano system as part of their regular diabetes care. Researchers will collect glucose sensor data and routine clinical information at the start of the study and during follow-up visits over about six months.
This multicentre, prospective, real-world observational study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the TouchCare Nano automated insulin delivery (AID) system with APGO™ algorithm in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The study is conducted in routine clinical practice at three specialized pediatric diabetes centers in Italy.
Participants aged 6 to 18 years with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and a minimum disease duration of six months are included after clinical indication for insulin pump therapy. All participants transition to the TouchCare Nano system as part of standard care, without any study-driven modification of treatment.
The TouchCare Nano system is a tubeless patch pump integrated with a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system and an adaptive control algorithm (APGO™) based on artificial intelligence principles, designed to optimize insulin delivery in a hybrid closed-loop mode.
Clinical and CGM-derived outcomes are collected at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months following the transition to automated insulin delivery. The primary outcome is Time in Range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes include additional CGM metrics, insulin delivery parameters, and clinical variables such as HbA1c and body mass index z-score.
Safety is evaluated by monitoring the incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis throughout the 6-month follow-up period. The study has received approval from the relevant Ethics Committee, and written informed consent is obtained from all participants and their parents or legal guardians prior to data collection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the TouchCare Nano system | This cohort includes children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years with type 1 diabetes who use the TouchCare Nano automated insulin delivery system as part of their regular diabetes care. All participants are followed over time to collect glucose sensor data and routine clinical information during a 6-month follow-up period. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time in normal glucose range (TIR) | Time in Range (TIR) is the percentage of time that glucose levels are between 70 and 180 milligrams per deciliter, measured using continuous glucose monitoring data. | Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time below normale glucose range (TBR) | TBR is the percentage of time during which glucose values measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are below 70 mg/dL | Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months |
| Total daily insulin dose delivered by insulin pump |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes receiving routine clinical care were recruited from specialized tertiary pediatric diabetes centers in Italy.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Angela Zanfardino, MD | University of Campania "L.Vanvitelli" | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pediatric Diabetology Unit at the AOU "G. Martino" | Messina | Italy | Italy | |||
| Centro Regionale di Diabetologia Pediatrica- AOU Univesità degli Studi della Campania "L.Vanvitelli" |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37616289 | Background | Amadou C, Melki V, Allain J, Clavel S, Gouet D, Chaillous L, Catargi B, Schaeplynck-Belicard P, Petit C, Thivolet C, Penfornis A. Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289684. eCollection 2023. | |
| 37646634 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Total amount of insulin administered per day, expressed in units per day (U/day), including both basal and bolus insulin delivery. |
| Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months |
| Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reflects the average blood glucose concentration over the preceding 8-12 weeks and is expressed as percentage (%) and mmol/mol. | Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months |
| Number of severe low blood sugar events | Number of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia requiring assistance from another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. | From initiation of the A8 TouchCare® Nano system to 6 months of follow-up |
| Time above glucose normal range (TAR) | TAR is the percentage of time during which glucose values measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) exceed 180 mg/dL | Baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months |
| Mean sensor glucose | Average interstitial glucose concentration measured by continuous glucose monitoring during the assessment period. | Baseline, 1 month, 3 and 6 months |
| Total daily basal insulin dose delivered by insulin pump | Total daily basal insulin dose delivered by insulin pump, defined as the cumulative background insulin administered through continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion over a 24-hour period (U/day), excluding bolus insulin. | Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months |
| Total daily bolus insulin dose delivered by insulin pump | Total daily bolus insulin dose delivered by insulin pump, defined as the cumulative amount of corrective and meal-related insulin administered through continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion over a 24-hour period (U/day), excluding basal/background insulin | Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months |
| Body mass index (BMI) | Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m²) and reflects overall body weight relative to height. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months |
| Number of diabetic ketoacidosis events | Number of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis defined by hyperglycaemia associated with metabolic acidosis and requiring medical evaluation or hospitalization. | From initiation of the A8 TouchCare® Nano system to 6 months of follow-up |
| Naples |
| Italy |
| Italy |
| Department of Diabetology and Endocrinology at the AOU Meyer IRCCS | Florence | Italy |
| Marks BE, Meighan S, Zehra A, Douvas JL, Rearson A, Suresh R, Brown EA, Wolf RM. Real-World Glycemic Outcomes with Early Omnipod 5 Use in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Nov;25(11):782-789. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0337. Epub 2023 Sep 20. |
| 38375861 | Background | Forlenza GP, DeSalvo DJ, Aleppo G, Wilmot EG, Berget C, Huyett LM, Hadjiyianni I, Mendez JJ, Conroy LR, Ly TT, Sherr JL. Real-World Evidence of Omnipod(R) 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System Use in 69,902 People with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Aug;26(8):514-525. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0578. Epub 2024 Feb 16. |
| 38634887 | Background | Kim JY, Jin SM, Kang ES, Kwak SH, Yang Y, Yoo JH, Bae JH, Moon JS, Jung CH, Bae JC, Suh S, Moon SJ, Song SO, Chon S, Kim JH. Comparison between a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system and a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2024 Jul;67(7):1235-1244. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06155-y. Epub 2024 Apr 18. |
| 39673446 | Background | Asgharzadeh A, Patel M, Connock M, Damery S, Ghosh I, Jordan M, Freeman K, Brown A, Court R, Baldwin S, Ogunlayi F, Stinton C, Cummins E, Al-Khudairy L. Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(80):1-190. doi: 10.3310/JYPL3536. |
| 40532759 | Background | Hughes MS, Levy CJ. The Future of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems. Endocr Pract. 2025 Sep;31(9):1162-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2025.05.752. Epub 2025 Jun 16. |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |