Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is directed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of autogenous bone block versus extended PRF block used for horizontal augmentation of atrophied esthetic area of maxillary ridge associated with simultaneous implant placement.
Twenty implants inserted in 16 patients will be randomly and uniformly distributed into two equal groups:
Group I: Ten dental implants will be inserted simultaneously in eight patients with horizontal ridge augmentation done by symphyseal onlay autogenous block technique.
Group II: Ten dental implants will be inserted simultaneously in nine patients with horizontal ridge augmentation done by onlay extended platelet rich fibrin technique using a mixture of allografts and xenografts.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I ( autogenous bone block) | Experimental | Ten dental implants will be inserted simultaneously with horizontal ridge augmentation done by onlay autogenous block technique. |
|
| Group II ( e-prf block) | Experimental | Ten implants were inserted in 9 patients with horizontal augmentation with eprf block. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| group I: autogenous bone block | Procedure | Full thichness flap is done and the implant is inserted in place. After that, an autogenous block is harvested from the symphyseal area and fixed in the area of the defect |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bone width | The horizontal bone gain resulted from the ridge augmentation was measured at 2,4,6 mm apical to the alveolar crest level, then the mean was calculated. This calculation was done at T0 (BG0), T3 (BG3) and T6 (BG6). | immediately after augmentation and implant placement (T0), and after 3 months (at time of implant loading) (T3) and after six months from implant loading (T6) (totally, 9 months follow up) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bone area | The horizontal bone gain area resulted from the ridge augmentation was measured at T0 (BG0), T3 (BG3) and T6 (BG6). | immediately after augmentation and implant placement (T0), and after 3 months (at time of implant loading) (T3) and after six months from implant loading (T6) (totally, 9 months follow up) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mansoura University | Al Mansurah | Egypt |
because the data are secret and only the primary researchers have the right to look at them
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients will be randomly and uniformly distributed into two equal groups:
Group I: Ten dental implants will be inserted simultaneously with horizontal ridge augmentation done by onlay autogenous block technique.
Group II: Ten dental implants will be inserted simultaneously with horizontal ridge augmentation done by onlay extended PRF technique using allograft.
Not provided
Not provided
quadruple ( participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
| extented platelet rich fibrin | Procedure | Full thickness flap is made and the implant is inserted in place. After that the platelet rich fibrin is collected from the patient blood and heated to produce e-platelet rich fibrin, mixed with a mixture of allograft and xenograft to make e-platelet rich fibrin block placed in the defect area |
|
| marginal bone loss |
On the cross-sectional view, a line was drawn buccally and lingually just parallel to the long axis of the implant, starting at the most cervical bone implant contact to the apex of the implant. Bone height in millimeters was recorded at immediate postsurgical phase after implant insertion. Vertical bone loss was calculated by subtracting recorded marginal bone level value buccally and lingullay after 3 months (at time of implant loading (T3) and after 6 months of implant loading (T6) from immediate postoperative value (T0). |
| immediately after augmentation and implant placement (T0), and after 3 months (at time of implant loading) (T3) and after six months from implant loading (T6) (totally, 9 months follow up) |
| Relative Alveolar Bone Density | All density records were collected from the cross-sectional view of CBCT using the Hounsfield unit (HU) according to Misch's classification. ROI tool was used representing the average estimated bone density at 3 mid-buccal levels of the placed implant at T0 (immediately after surgery) and after 3 months (at time of implant loading (T3) and after 6 months of implant loading (T6), in comparison to the primary measures. | immediately after augmentation and implant placement (T0), and after 3 months (at time of implant loading) (T3) and after six months from implant loading (T6) (totally, 9 months follow up) |
| Bone volume | The volume of the gained bone resulted from the ridge augmentation was measured at T0 (BG0), T3 (BG3) and T6 (BG6). | immediately after augmentation and implant placement (T0), and after 3 months (at time of implant loading) (T3) and after six months from implant loading (T6) (totally, 9 months follow up) |
| Postoperative Pain | - By using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for assessment of pain by the patient on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days after augmentation surgery. (0-1=None, 2-4=Mild, 5-7=Moderate, 8-10=Severe) | on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days after augmentation surgery |
| Landry Healing Index for Wound Healing Evaluation | - The area of operation was examined by using healing index by Landry et al., this index scores clinical signs and symptoms of infection as redness, hotness, pus discharge, bleeding and pain. In addition to that, any manifestations of wound healing disturbance including wound dehiscence and exposure of underlying bone graft were recorded carefully. | immediately at 14th day during suture removal visit, one month and 3 months after surgery. |
| Modified sulcus bleeding Index (mSBI) | Clinical signs and symptoms of inflammation of peri-implant mucosa were graded using criteria of mSBI. It was recorded immediately after implant loading and after 6 months of loading at four aspects around the implants; buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal. The four readings were averaged and approximated to nearest 0.5. | It was recorded immediately after implant loading and after 6 months of loading. |
| Peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) | Depth of the peri-implant sulcus was recorded immediately after implant loading and after 6 months of loading. The distance between the gingival margin and the base of the pocket was recorded using a graduated periodontal probe with light force to avoid undue tissue damage and over-extension into the healthy tissue. The probe was inserted buccally, mesially, lingually and distally around each implant in a line parallel to the implant vertical axis until the blunt end of the probe reached the base of the pocket. The four readings were averaged and approximated to nearest 0.5mm. | immediately after implant loading and after 6 months of loading |
| Measurement of implant stability | The primary Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) was measured by using a resonance frequency analyzer (Osstell device) immediately after the placement (T0) and after three months at time of implant loading (T3), then after six months from implant loading (T6). RFA technology depends on fork tuning principle. A Smart Peg was attached to the implant and torqued to 10 Ncm and then the peg was made to vibrate just like a tuning fork by the Osstell device. The purpose here was to find the resonance frequency with the strongest vibration. | immediately after the placement (T0) and after three months at time of implant loading (T3), then after six months from implant loading (T6). |